Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Supreme Court Declines to Review Gun Bans

Friday, June 24, 2016

Supreme Court Declines to Review Gun Bans

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review lower court decisions upholding sweeping bans on popular semiautomatic firearms enacted in Connecticut and New York in the wake of the attack on Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT. The high court last December took a pass in a similar case originating out of Highland Park, a Chicago suburb. Justices Thomas and Scalia filed a written dissent from that earlier decision, stating, “noncompliance with our Second Amendment precedents warrants this Court’s attention as much as any of our precedents ….”

Noncompliance with the Second Amendment, unfortunately, has been exactly what the legislatures of various states have engaged in by enacting these bans, and it has also been the posture of most courts that have reviewed them. In the Highland Park case, for example, the majority opinion suggested that even if the ban's infringement of Second Amendment rights had no beneficial effect on safety whatsoever, it could still be justified by the false sense of security it might impart to local residents. A dissenting judge wrote, “Both the ordinance and this court’s opinion upholding it are directly at odds with the central holdings of [the Supreme Court’s decisions in] Heller and McDonald.”

Advocates for the Second Amendment and the rule of law briefly received a boost in February when a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit remanded a case on Maryland’s semiauto ban to the trial court for reconsideration under strict scrutiny, the highest constitutional standard. Unfortunately, that panel ruling was vacated when the Fourth Circuit decided the case would be reheard before the full 15-member court. That rehearing occurred in May, and a decision remains pending.

Ironically, one of the most telling statements on the uselessness of the various state bans – and the draconian steps needed for them to have any effect – came from an advisor to the Obama White House.  Greg Ridgeway, then Deputy Director of the National Institute of Justice – an agency whose mission, according to its website, is to “strengthen science” and “advance justice” – issued a report in January of 2013 that discussed the efficacy of various forms of gun control.

The leaked memo, apparently never intended for public release, contained a number of inconvenient truths for the administration. Among them: “Since assault weapons are not a major contributor to US gun homicide and the existing stock of guns is large, an assault weapon ban is unlikely to have an impact on gun violence.” Such a measure could only be effective, the memo opined, were it “coupled with a gun buyback [i.e., enforced surrender] and no exemptions.”

And, indeed, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are now advocating for just that.

The Supreme Court’s decision on Monday is something of a mixed blessing for Second Amendment advocates. On the one hand, it allows legislative and lower court defiance to go unchecked and emboldens those who are eager to act on the gun controller’s final solution of broad bans enforced by confiscation.

Yet with the passing of Justice Scalia earlier this year, it is far from clear that the Supreme Court would be willing to take the next steps implied by the landmark Heller and McDonald decisions. Some fear the current court, at best an even 4-4 split in support for the Second Amendment, is not even committed to upholding the individual rights view recognized in those decisions.

And whatever support does remain could be tilted by Scalia’s replacement (and would be, if Obama’s nominee were confirmed). That makes this year’s presidential election a referendum on your right to keep and bear arms, especially with Hillary Clinton making her confiscatory designs clear.

TRENDING NOW
Show-Me State Sham: Sen. McCaskill Cons Missouri Voters on Guns

News  

Friday, October 19, 2018

Show-Me State Sham: Sen. McCaskill Cons Missouri Voters on Guns

It appears Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) forgot she represents the Show-Me State. Missouri’s nickname derives from its residents’ healthy skepticism – especially for politicians and their “frothy eloquence.” Rather than take someone’s word for something, ...

What Happens if our Opponents Take the U.S. House?

News  

Thursday, September 20, 2018

What Happens if our Opponents Take the U.S. House?

There is no question that our liberties are at stake on November 6th. The Democrat leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives has become completely radicalized when it comes to the Second Amendment. Our constitutional ...

Illinois “Parking Lot Law” Shields Employee from Termination

News  

Friday, October 19, 2018

Illinois “Parking Lot Law” Shields Employee from Termination

A federal appeals court recently upheld a labor arbitrator’s decision concluding that, in light of the state’s concealed carry law, an employer had improperly fired an employee for violating the company’s weapons policy. The case, Ameren ...

For Levi’s, Freedom isn’t Fashionable

News  

Friday, October 19, 2018

For Levi’s, Freedom isn’t Fashionable

Americans eager to take political direction from a multinational pants manufacturer were in luck this week. On Tuesday, PRWeek, a public relations trade publication, published an interview with Levi Strauss & Co. Chief Communications Officer Kelly McGinnis and ...

Levi’s Teams with Billionaire Michael Bloomberg to Attack Gun Rights

News  

Friday, September 7, 2018

Levi’s Teams with Billionaire Michael Bloomberg to Attack Gun Rights

Levi Strauss & Co. established its brand in the mid-19th century by selling durable clothing to working-class Americans. As Levi’s signature jeans gained popularity amongst a wider set in the middle of the last century, ...

Poll: Most Americans Oppose Ban on “America’s Rifle”

News  

Friday, October 19, 2018

Poll: Most Americans Oppose Ban on “America’s Rifle”

This week, Gallup released the results of a poll which included a finding that should surprise no one: Americans oppose a ban on AR-15s and similar semiautomatic firearms by robust a margin of 17%. Meanwhile, current support ...

President’s Column | Your Vote Outweighs Their Millions: Make Your Voice Heard Nov. 6

News  

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

President’s Column | Your Vote Outweighs Their Millions: Make Your Voice Heard Nov. 6

My fellow NRA members, we stand at the edge of the precipice of one of the most important elections of our lives. That is the reality we face, and we face it just days from ...

South Carolina: Governor McMaster Signs Pro-Gun Bill

Monday, May 22, 2017

South Carolina: Governor McMaster Signs Pro-Gun Bill

Last Friday, May 19, Governor Henry McMaster (R) signed H. 3429 into law.  This bill went into effect upon the Governor’s approval.

You Can’t Make This Stuff Up:  Brooklyn Area Witches Unite to “Take Down” People “In Charge,” Hurl Curses at Justice Kavanaugh

News  

Friday, October 19, 2018

You Can’t Make This Stuff Up: Brooklyn Area Witches Unite to “Take Down” People “In Charge,” Hurl Curses at Justice Kavanaugh

Well, Samhain is approaching, and if you’re familiar with the wing of the extreme Left that also identifies as witches and warlocks, that can only mean one thing: more politically-inspired attempts at paranormal activity! We ...

Who’s BS’ing Now? Gonzalez Argues for Gun Confiscation but Insists She’s “Pro Second Amendment”

News  

Friday, October 12, 2018

Who’s BS’ing Now? Gonzalez Argues for Gun Confiscation but Insists She’s “Pro Second Amendment”

Gun control advocates are constantly looking for the right messenger to push an agenda that boils down to law-abiding Americans giving up their freedoms, their security, and their property without expectation of affecting the behavior ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.