Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Web of Deceit? School District's Internet Filter Chooses Sides in Gun "Debate"

Friday, June 20, 2014

Most schools these days like to trumpet their support of “critical thinking.”  For at least one high school in Connecticut, however, that apparently means thinking that criticizes only one side of a contested issue.

In May, student Andrew Lampart of Nonnewaug High School was using the school’s internet service to gather information for an assigned debate on gun control, when he discovered a bias in the school’s filter.  The censorship software the school uses to determine school-inappropriate sites blocked access to NRA’s and other pro-gun groups’ websites but allowed access to the sites of Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety and other gun control groups.

Intrigued by the disparity, Lampart went on to test the filter’s bias by attempting to access sites on opposing sides of other politically contentious issues.  In several instances, Lampart found that websites for groups taking a position on one side of an issue were blocked, while corresponding sites for organizations taking the opposite position remained available.

Lampart brought the matter to the attention of Regional School District 14 Superintendent Jody Ian Goeler, who told him that the filter is necessary to block “hate speech.”  When the problems persisted, Lampart took his concerns before a meeting of the school district’s Board of Education.

On Thursday, the superintendent released a letter to the school community in an attempt to address the problem.  Goeler explained that the intention of the filter is to “protect minors from potentially harmful or inappropriate content.”  According the superintendent this includes, “pornography, illegal drugs, gambling, violence/hate/racism, cults/the occult, to name a few.”

Goeler went on to explain that websites are also blocked if they are categorized by the firewall as “political/advocacy group.”  However, the superintendent admitted, “many of the liberal sites accessible to the student fell into the ‘not rated’ category, which was unblocked while many of the conservative sites were in the ‘political/advocacy group’.”

Apparently, somewhere along this unfortunate chain of events, someone determined that information that supports a robust right to arms is “advocacy”--or worse, “hate speech”--while information that promotes restrictions on the right is merely “information.”  In other words, the responsible individuals don’t just believe the pro-gun side is on the wrong side of the debate, they refuse to recognize the debate even exists.  A more counterproductive approach to education is hard to imagine.

We don’t know if the district’s web filter blocks dictionary.com, but just in case, here’s how it defines “debate”:  “a discussion, as of a public question in an assembly, involving opposing viewpoints” (emphasis added).  To be sure, if you search enough anti-gun websites, you will find some differences.  Some seek to raise funds through exploitive emotional appeals.  Others assault the reader with aggressive hyperbole and slanderous fear-mongering.  Still others use a mixture of arrogant condescension with elaborate misrepresentations of statistics and legal authority.  To say they have opposing viewpoints, however, is a stretch.  Ultimately, all embrace the concept of civilian disarmament.

While the filter may satisfy certain notions of political correctness, it does nothing to enhance the ability of students to gain a sophisticated and comprehensive view of the issues.  Whether or not this is a good thing depends on what the purpose of a public high school is considered to be.  If it’s a place for learning, the filter is counterproductive.  If it’s merely a place to be indoctrinated into a rigid social and political orthodoxy, the filter is indispensible.

For those fortunate enough to have unfettered access to information, we welcome you to this site.  While it’s true we believe one side of the debate has the better arguments, we also report on what the opposition has to say, usually with links to their materials.  Unlike some, we believe that the more readers are acquainted with the facts, the more likely they are to agree with our viewpoint.  Either way, we’re willing to let you make up your own mind.

So far, the school is blaming the “filtering service provider” for the “apparent inconsistencies.”  Whatever the case, we hope Goeler follows through on his assertion that “the school district is trying to determine the reason for the inconsistency and if the bias is pervasive enough to justify switching to another content filtering provider.”  In the meantime, the lopsided accessibility of information continues.  This leaves the district in a very precarious position regarding the First Amendment, a topic which we suggest they research, should their filter allow it.

TRENDING NOW
The Washington Post Gives Gun Control Group and U.S. Senator Three Pinocchios on Suppressors

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, March 24, 2017

The Washington Post Gives Gun Control Group and U.S. Senator Three Pinocchios on Suppressors

Last week, we wrote about Americans for Responsible Solutions’ irresponsible misinformation about The Hearing Protection Act on Twitter.  Apparently, we weren’t the only ones who took notice of ARS’s complete disregard for the facts on ...

Maryland: House Passes Pro-Carry Legislation

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Maryland: House Passes Pro-Carry Legislation

Yesterday, the Maryland House of Delegates passed House Bill 1036 by a 97-41 vote.

Ohio: Critical Self-Defense Law Takes Effect Today!

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Ohio: Critical Self-Defense Law Takes Effect Today!

Today, March 21, the provisions of the critical self-defense legislation, Sub. Senate Bill 199, go into effect.  Thanks to your active involvement last session, this bill was signed by Governor Kasich last December.  This law ...

Illinois: Gun Seizure Bill Could be Heard by House at Any Time

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Illinois: Gun Seizure Bill Could be Heard by House at Any Time

The Illinois House of Representatives could consider House Bill 2354 at any time.

Arkansas Action Needed: Anti-Gun Bill Which Undermines Concealed Carry Headed to House

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Arkansas Action Needed: Anti-Gun Bill Which Undermines Concealed Carry Headed to House

Today, the Arkansas Senate passed Senate Bill 724, an anti-gun bill which undermines some of the key advancements made with the passage and enactment of House Bill 1249.  SB 724 is now headed to the ...

Oklahoma: Multiple Pro-Gun Bills Passed Out of the House

Friday, March 24, 2017

Oklahoma: Multiple Pro-Gun Bills Passed Out of the House

This week, the Oklahoma House of Representatives passed multiple pro-gun bills, including House Bill 1721, House Bill 2323, and House Bill 2322. 

Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee Embraces Heller and Originalism During Senate Hearings

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, March 24, 2017

Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee Embraces Heller and Originalism During Senate Hearings

Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, President Trump’s pick to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia on the U.S. Supreme court, asserted during his confirmation hearings this week that Scalia’s landmark Second Amendment opinion in District of ...

Utah: Governor Signs Self-Defense Legislation into Law

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Utah: Governor Signs Self-Defense Legislation into Law

Tonight, Governor Gary Herbert signed House Bill 198 into law.

Continuing to Fight in California

Friday, March 24, 2017

Continuing to Fight in California

We are excited to inform you of our new California specific webpage – Stand and Fight California.   On this page you will find State Legislation, Legal Updates, and How to Get Involved, among other California ...

Nevada: Senate Passes Anti-Gun SB 115

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Nevada: Senate Passes Anti-Gun SB 115

Yesterday, March 21, the Senate passed anti-gun Senate Bill 115 with a 12-9 vote.  SB 115 was sent to the Assembly for further consideration.  Sponsored by state Senator Moises Denis (D-2), SB 115 would expand the list ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.