Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Gun Control and the Elastic Meaning of “Transfer”— Colorado Court Moves the Needle

Monday, August 9, 2021

Gun Control and the Elastic Meaning of “Transfer”— Colorado Court Moves the Needle

One of laws championed by the gun-grabbing crowd is the so-called universal background check, in which private sales of firearms are subjected to a criminal background check, fees, and paperwork. What gun control advocates fail to make clear, though, is that their concept of sale” extends to firearm transfers,” being gifts, loans and any other transaction, regardless of how temporary, where possession but not ownership of the firearm changes.

A failed background check initiative in Maine adopted a definition of transfer” that meant to sell, furnish, give, lend, deliver or otherwise provide with or without consideration.” The Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility (WAGR), which drafted the law in Washington State, defined a transfer” as the intended delivery of a firearm to another person without consideration of payment or promise of payment including, but not limited to, gifts and loans.” The proponents of the Maine law misleadingly packaged the initiative as one that applied to private sales.” WAGR likewise maintained that simply handing someone your gun … is not a transfer” under their language, and scoffed that concerns about the law applying to temporary transfers between law-abiding gun owners were farfetched fear-mongering over invented scenarios.” After the WAGR-drafted law was passed, it became obvious that opponents were correct and it did apply to simply handing someone” a gun, as instructors and students in hunter safety classes for the states fish and wildlife department quickly learned.

The elastic concept of transfer” was stretched even further in a Colorado criminal case, People v. Johnson, No. 18CA1212, 2021 COA 102 (Colo. Ct. App. July 29, 2021).

A state law on straw purchasing, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-111(1), provides that [a]ny person who knowingly purchases or otherwise obtains a firearm on behalf of or for transfer to a person who the transferor knows or reasonably should know is ineligible to possess a firearm” commits a felony.

Sylvia Johnson was charged with violating the law after she purchased and stored a firearm in an apartment she shared with her common-law husband, Jaron Trujillo. Johnson was not herself under a firearm disability, but Trujillo was a convicted felon, and subject to a protection order that both barred him from Johnsons apartment and – as Johnson knew – prohibited him from possessing firearms.

Johnson purchased the gun after she went to a pawnbroker with Trujillo to look for jewelry and a gun for herself. Her evidence was that she bought the gun to protect her children and her whole family,” including Trujillo. She paid for the gun, and testified that she was not acting as a straw purchaser or middleman for Trujillo and had never given the gun to him. She did, however, keep it in a closet in the apartment where she lived with Trujillo. The evidence on how Trujillo knew where the gun was kept was inconsistent: Johnson said she told him, while Trujillo testified he guessed its location.

Sixteen days after Johnson bought the gun, a manager at the apartment building called police after seeing Trujillo on the premises in violation of the protection order. Officers located Trujillo outside the apartment with Johnsons gun in his pocket. Trujillo admitted he took the gun while Johnson was at work and away from the apartment. There was no indication that Trujillo had previously accessed or taken the gun, or that Johnson was even aware that he had taken it.     

The Colorado Court of Appeals found Johnson guilty of violating Section 18-12-111(1), concluding that she knowingly purchased the firearm for the purpose of transferringit to Trujillo.”

The purpose” element was apparently satisfied because the court determined Johnson purchased the gun with the knowledge that Trujillo… would access it to protect himself.” The law Johnson was charged with violating does not include a definition of transfer,” so the court referred to the states universal background check law. Transfer” in that context includes temporary transfers without a change in ownership or title, and without an exception for temporary transfers of a firearm in the form of shared use.” According to the court, it necessarily followed that the General Assembly gave transfera broad definition for purposes of the prohibition against the transferof firearms by straw purchasers,’” a prohibition found in an unrelated and separate law.

Although there is no indication in the decision that Johnson had given Trujillo permission to access the gun – and she expressly denied ever having given the gun to him – the court determined that a transfer” had indeed occurred. Johnson had shared possession of the firearm” with Trujillo, and the two of them had “‘transferredthe firearm by conveying, moving, and shifting it between themselves. Thus, a transferof the firearm occurred when Trujillo picked it up from the closet, where Johnson had left it.” Essentially, a transfer” had occurred because Trujillo had access to the gun by virtue of the fact that they shared a roof.              

In hindsight, Sylvia Johnson was unwise in sharing her home with her common-law spouse. Her lapse in judgment means she now faces up to six years in prison and a potential fine of up to $500,000, and her felony conviction means she joins Trujillo as a person barred from possessing or purchasing a firearm.

For others in the gun-owning community, the courts interpretation of transfer” raises real questions and concerns. If, as the court appears to say, a transfer” occurs by passively allowing others to access places where a firearm is kept and another person takes possession of the gun, regardless of the custodians knowledge or consent, the requirement for an actual positive act of simply handing someone your gun” is eliminated. Building a case of a transfer” based on passive access potentially has wider repercussions.      

The courts ruling is based on the Colorado straw purchase law but borrowed” from the law on private transfers and background checks. Will future courts circle back” by using the new interpretation from this straw purchase case when dealing with violations of the background check law? That law prohibits transfers or attempts to transfer possession of a firearm” unless the person first complies with the mandatory background check requirements using a licensed dealer, and as the Johnson court indicated, that law has no exception for temporary transfers of a firearm in the home where shared possession based on access is presumed.

This may be a case of alarmist thinking – and we hope it is – but as the past has shown, its not unlikely that predicted gun control scenarios summarily dismissed as outlandish later materialize into reality.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Colorado private transfers
TRENDING NOW
Biden Administration Bans Importation of Russian Ammunition

News  

Sunday, August 22, 2021

Biden Administration Bans Importation of Russian Ammunition

The Biden Administration’s Department of State announced that it will soon prohibit the importation of Russian ammunition into the United States. According to a release on the Department of State’s website, “[n]ew and pending permit applications ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Virginia: Terry McAuliffe Wants to Ban Guns, Register Gun Owners, and Restrict Carry

News  

Monday, October 18, 2021

Virginia: Terry McAuliffe Wants to Ban Guns, Register Gun Owners, and Restrict Carry

Virginians are increasingly exercising their Second Amendment rights. NICS Checks in the commonwealth were up more than 60-percent from 2019 to 2020. From 2019 to 2021 there was a 21-percent increase in the number of ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Monday, June 30, 2014

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

NYSRPA Case Exposes Biden’s Anti-Second Amendment Bias, Vindicates Opposition to Garland

News  

Monday, October 18, 2021

NYSRPA Case Exposes Biden’s Anti-Second Amendment Bias, Vindicates Opposition to Garland

Further evidence of Joe Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland’s contempt for the Second Amendment has emerged in recent weeks.

Idaho: Governor Little Signs Permitless Carry Expansion Legislation into Law

Friday, March 27, 2020

Idaho: Governor Little Signs Permitless Carry Expansion Legislation into Law

On Wednesday, Governor Brad Little signed important self-defense legislation, House Bill 516.  This permitless carry expansion legislation was sent to the Governor’s desk prior to the Legislature adjourning last week.

The View Doesn’t Appreciate a Right

News  

Monday, October 18, 2021

The View Doesn’t Appreciate a Right

Women, and especially black women, are increasingly buying firearms for self-defense. This reality did not sit well with the hosts of a somehow still-running daytime talk show.

DOJ Releases Biden Gun Confiscation Order Legislation

News  

Wednesday, June 9, 2021

DOJ Releases Biden Gun Confiscation Order Legislation

DOJ has made clear that Garland’s selective definition of “civil rights” has no room for the Second Amendment...

Ohio: Senate Committee Hearing Constitutional Carry & Emergency Powers Bills

Monday, October 4, 2021

Ohio: Senate Committee Hearing Constitutional Carry & Emergency Powers Bills

Tomorrow, the Senate Government Oversight and Reform Committee is holding a second proponent testimony hearing for Senate Bill 215, the constitutional carry bill. In addition, Senate Bill 185, to guarantee that Second Amendment rights remain protected ...

Anti-gunners Launch Campaign to Intimidate U.S. Supreme Court as Second Amendment Case Looms

News  

Monday, October 11, 2021

Anti-gunners Launch Campaign to Intimidate U.S. Supreme Court as Second Amendment Case Looms

For many decades, gun control proponents who saw their fortunes wane in legislatures from coast to coast and who were unable to get traction with Congress could at least console themselves with the thought that ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.