Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Bloomberg Quits After Coming up Short on Super Tuesday

Monday, March 9, 2020

Bloomberg Quits After Coming up Short on Super Tuesday

Last week, New York billionaire Michael Bloomberg joined the growing list of Democrats who have abandoned their dream of taking on President Donald Trump this November. His effort will be remembered as one in which he spent big but accomplished little.

Like other failed candidates before him, Bloomberg made his anti-gun platform the centerpiece of his campaign, even shelling out $11 million to run an anti-gun propaganda piece during this year’s Super Bowl. But he simply could not raise his campaign to the heights necessary to secure any meaningful support.

The lessons learned from Bloomberg’s failed campaign may dwarf those of other failures, which is no small feat.

First, we learned that, no matter how large your bank account, and no matter how much money you spend to flood the airwaves and clog computers with your messaging, you simply cannot pay the American people to like someone so unlikeable.

Bloomberg shattered all records for the amount of personal wealth an individual has spent in an attempt to win a primary, shrinking his bank account by more than half-a-billion dollars. He also made the previous record for how much an individual spent on one election cycle for one elected office—a record he already owned—look small by comparison.

In 2009, Bloomberg spent about $102 million to win his third term as New York City mayor.  That works out to a cost of about $174 per vote, and at the time, seemed an outrageous sum.  Rudy Giuliani, his predecessor, spent less than $10 per vote to win his second term in 1997. While we won’t know for sure how much Mike spent on his failed primary run until his final campaign reports come in, it is safe to say it was many hundreds of millions of dollars.

Presuming he wasted $550 million, he will have ended up spending around $324 for each of the 1.6 million votes he received in the primary. The campaign to elect President Trump, by comparison, spent less than $5 per vote to win the White House in 2016. That would seem to settle the question of which of the two New York billionaires is more financially savvy, to say nothing of more politically popular.

Ultimately, all that money could not conceal the fact that Bloomberg’s personality and policy shortcomings simply could not be elevated in any way.

On the debate stage in Las Vegas, he shrunk under a withering attack from Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren. During the Charleston, S.C., debate, Bloomberg tried self-deprecating humor, but his delivery was so stunted and awkward, the laughs never materialized (except at his expense).

Virtually every time the cameras caught him in a public setting, he came across as less a normal, everyday American, and more like an animatronic character from Disneyland’s It’s A Small World ride.

When all was said and done on Super Tuesday, when 14 states held their primaries, Bloomberg could rise no higher than third place in any of the contests.  Well, except for tiny American Samoa, where he actually won that territory’s caucus. This small victory for Bloomberg, however, was simply too little, too late.

As with other failed campaigns, we also learned, or were reminded, that running as a candidate whose central theme is shrinking our rights protected under the Second Amendment will yield diminutive returns.

Obscure California representative Eric Swalwell tried to champion gun control and failed. So did Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke, Kamala Harris, and Cory Booker.

Of course, Bloomberg is still one of the richest men in the world, and still hates the idea of the Second Amendment protecting the rights of law-abiding Americans to be able to own firearms and to use them for lawful purposes, especially self-defense.  It would be short-sighted to think that abandoning the Democrat presidential primary means we have seen the last of this billionaire’s efforts, to say nothing of his spending, to cut our right to keep and bear arms off at the knees.

In fact, Bloomberg will certainly release his media empire from the short leash he had on it while he was a candidate, and we can anticipate renewed attacks on anyone or anything that might stand in the way of his new goal: securing the Democrat nomination of Joe Biden in an effort to defeat President Donald Trump this November.

And the billions Bloomberg had hoped to use to buy the White House for himself will now, undoubtedly, be used in an attempt to buy it for someone else.  He has already established a Super PAC through which he can funnel his wealth, although its name has yet to be revealed.  If he succeeds with opening the checkbook to defeat Trump, you can rest assured that he will have purchased unlimited access to those in Washington who share his goal of eviscerating the Second Amendment.

NRA, of course, will continue to do everything possible to ensure Bloomberg continues to come up short of his goals.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Bloomberg
TRENDING NOW
U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

Minnesota: Removal of Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Added to Environmental Omnibus Bill

Friday, June 6, 2025

Minnesota: Removal of Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Added to Environmental Omnibus Bill

This week outside of regular session, the Environment Omnibus bill was agreed upon. This omnibus bill would remove shotgun-only hunting zones in the state. A special session has been scheduled for Monday, June 9th, for the ...

NRA Praises Supreme Court Decision in Smith & Wesson v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, June 5, 2025

NRA Praises Supreme Court Decision in Smith & Wesson v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in the closely watched case, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, unanimously holding that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act ...

NRA-ILA Petitions the U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to NFA Restrictions on Short-Barreled Rifles

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, June 6, 2025

NRA-ILA Petitions the U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to NFA Restrictions on Short-Barreled Rifles

Today, the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) filed a Petition for Certiorari requesting that the U.S. Supreme Court hear a challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934’s restrictions on short-barreled rifles ...

North Carolina: Permitless Carry Bill Headed to Governor Stein

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

North Carolina: Permitless Carry Bill Headed to Governor Stein

Today, the House of Representatives voted 59-48 to pass Senate Bill 50 (S50), Freedom to Carry NC. The bill now heads to Governor Josh Stein for consideration.

Mexico, U.S. Gun Control Activists Lose Big at Supreme Court

News  

Monday, June 9, 2025

Mexico, U.S. Gun Control Activists Lose Big at Supreme Court

For the second year in a row, gun control advocates have lost a unanimous decision at the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Supreme Court Rejects Hardware Cases, Lets Record of Anti-gun Defiance Build

News  

Monday, June 9, 2025

Supreme Court Rejects Hardware Cases, Lets Record of Anti-gun Defiance Build

Last week, after they were re-listed for conference 15 times, the U.S. Supreme Court finally denied petitions for review on two major Second Amendment cases, with just one vote shy of the four needed for review. 

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Ban on Firearms Possession by Nonviolent Felons

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Ban on Firearms Possession by Nonviolent Felons

Today, the National Rifle Association, along with the Second Amendment Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a challenge to the federal lifetime ...

Maine: Floor Votes on Extreme Anti-Gun Bills TODAY

Thursday, June 12, 2025

Maine: Floor Votes on Extreme Anti-Gun Bills TODAY

Today, June 12th, both chambers will hold floor votes on a slew of anti-gun bills.

Rights Delayed and Rights Denied: DOJ Steps-Up Pressure Over Permit Delays, Refusals to Process

News  

Monday, June 9, 2025

Rights Delayed and Rights Denied: DOJ Steps-Up Pressure Over Permit Delays, Refusals to Process

It is almost exactly three years ago that the United States Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case of NYSRPA v. Bruen, invalidating the “may issue” carry licensing regime in New York State and in the five ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.