Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

Court Sides with Home Invaders and Landlords Who Disarm Vulnerable Residents in Maine Case

Friday, May 13, 2016

Court Sides with Home Invaders and Landlords Who Disarm Vulnerable Residents in Maine Case

Burglars targeting seniors and landlords who run publicly-subsidized apartments where such criminals strike with abandon won a legal victory in Maine this week, as Knox County Justice William Stokes dismissed a suit by a man threatened with eviction for exercising his Second Amendment rights.

We have been reporting since last year on the case of Harvey Lembo, a 67-year-old former police officer and lobsterman who obtained a handgun for self-protection after his subsidized apartment in Epping, Maine was burglarized multiple times by thieves looking for pain medicine. And it’s a fortunate thing he did. The very night after he obtained the gun, the wheelchair-bound senior was forced to use it to defend his life against yet another home invader, this one with a felony record for a violent crime.

Although police did not charge Lembo, who shot the intruder in his shoulder while in fear for his life, his landlord, Stanford Management Company, informed him less than 24 hours after the incident that under the terms of his lease, he would have to relinquish gun ownership or face eviction.

Lembo sued Stanford Management, citing the Maine Civil Rights Act, which is supposed to protect the state’s residents from infringements of their constitutional liberties. Rockland Park, the apartment complex where Lembo lives, advertises on its website that “[s]ome apartment homes are subsidized and Section 8 welcome.” Thus, the landlord’s business model depends at least in part on public funds. Lembo himself receives housing subsidies, and he cannot readily relocate because the number of apartment developments that accept such vouchers is limited. That makes him and other residents of places like Rockland Park more susceptible to negligent or heavy-handed treatment.

Lembo’s suit sought damages and a permanent injunction against the landlord for threatening to evict him for lawfully possessing a firearm in his residence. He cited the constitutional rights to arms of both the U.S. and Maine Constitutions as protecting his right to do so. While constitutional rights can only be directly enforced against government action, Maine’s Civil Rights Act also applies to violations of legally protected rights occurring by private actors through “physical force or violence against a person, damage or destruction of property or trespass on property,” or by threats of the same. Lembo noted in his complaint that a forcible eviction premised on a constitutional violation would necessarily involve force and trespass, and his landlord’s threat to evict him on illegal grounds was necessarily a threat of such force and trespass.

Justice Stokes, who admitted in a footnote to his opinion that he was formerly a member of Michael Bloomberg’s gun control organization Mayors Against Illegal Guns, disagreed. Rather, he characterized the threat of eviction as simply an expression “of an intention to pursue available legal remedies.” The court adjudicating the eviction case would then have to decide the rights of the parties and supervise a resolution of their conflict.

The upshot of the ruling is that Maine landlords can threaten to evict vulnerable tenants like Mr. Lembo for any reason, and provided they threaten to go through a judge, the tenant is helpless to raise a civil rights claim until after the individual or his property have already been illegally thrown out the door.

That may be a win for landlords that won’t protect their residents but still seek to disarm them, but it’s an even bigger win for predatory criminals who can plan who to victimize simply by matching up gun-free apartment complexes with elderly or other vulnerable tenants.

It’s a good thing that in the moment of crisis, Mr. Lembo’s gun came through for him. It’s a sad thing that the same cannot be said of a legal system that too often fails to protect society’s most susceptible members against its most opportunistic and plundering ones.

The good news is that, going forward, residents of subsidized housing in Mr. Lembo’s situation will have the law on their side, thanks to the enactment this session of NRA-backed LD 1572, an Act To Ensure Nondiscrimination against Gun Owners in Public Housing. Sponsored by Senator Andre Cushing (R-Penobscot), the law will prevent public housing authorities from adding provisions in rental agreements to ban the lawful ownership, use, possession, bearing or transportation of firearms by tenants. The legislature, at least, could recognize an unjust situation when they saw it, and they chose to stand with those who wish to exercise their rights and protect themselves. It’s a shame Mr. Lembo had to endure what he did, but his cautionary tale will ensure his experience won’t be repeated in the Pine Tree State.

TRENDING NOW
Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

In late August, Virginia State Delegate Dan Helmer (D-10), who represents a portion of the Northern Virginia D.C. suburb of Fairfax County, took to Reddit for an “ask me anything” (AMA) question and answer session.

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

Economics has a concept called “revealed preference.” The gist is that a person’s observed actions reveal more about their preferences than what a person might profess to favor. 

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

The federal government’s promise to provide a pathway to restore firearm rights is no longer merely a commitment on paper. 

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

One of the narratives invented by gun control activists and their political allies to try to make their agenda more palatable to the general public has been to recast gun crime as a “public health ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

Saturday, September 5, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

The National Rifle Association, alongside the Independence Institute and the American Suppressor Association, filed an amicus brief on Friday in the consolidated cases Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins, which challenge the "assault weapons” bans ...

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

News  

Friday, March 21, 2025

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

On March 20, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) published an interim final rule entitled, Withdrawing the Attorney General’s Delegation of Authority. That bland title belies the historic nature of the measure, which is aimed at reviving ...

Biden-Era “Engaged in the Business” Rule (Again) Ruled Illegal

News  

Monday, August 31, 2026

Biden-Era “Engaged in the Business” Rule (Again) Ruled Illegal

The anti-gun programs and policies of the Biden-Harris administration have been falling like dominoes, lately.

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

News  

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

On August 5, 2026, Judge Wesley Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.