Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

** REPORT on Rounds 1 & 2 ** Stopping Firearms Preemption Violations by Local Government Officials across Florida

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

DATE:        February 18, 2011
TO:            USF & NRA Member and Friends
FROM:       Marion P. Hammer
                 USF Executive Director
                 NRA Past President

REPORT ON  ROUND 1 **  STOP Local Governments across Florida From Violating State Law

Senate Bill 402, introduced by state Senator Joe Negron (R-28), was heard today, February 8 in the Senate Criminal Justice Committee.  SB 402 PASSED by a vote of 3 to 2.

SB 402 would provide penalties for government officials, local governments and agencies that willfully and knowingly violate the state firearms preemption law. There are no penalties currently in the law.

Voting to uphold Florida law, the Constitution and to protect your firearms rights were the following:

Senator Greg Evers (R-2)  evers.greg.web@flsenate.gov;

Senator Charlie Dean (R-3)  dean.charles.web@flsenate.gov;

Senator Paula Dockery (R-15) dockery.paula.web@flsenate.gov;


Voting against punishing local officials for violating Florida law were:

Senator Gwen Margolis (D-35) margolis.gwen@web.flsenate.gov;

Senator Chris Smith (D-29)  smith.chris.web@flsenate.gov;


Your e-mail to Senators was very effective (profuse thanks for your help).

REPORT ON  ROUND 2 **  House Subcommittee to Hear Legislation to STOP Governments Across Florida from Violating State Law

House Bill 45, introduced by state Representative Matt Gaetz (R-4), was heard today, February 8 in the House Criminal Justice Subcommittee.  HB 45 PASSED by a vote of 10 to 4.

HB 45 would provide penalties for government officials, local governments and agencies that willfully and knowingly violate the state firearms preemption law. There are no penalties currently in the law.

Voting to uphold Florida law, the Constitution and to protect your firearms rights were the following:

Representative Dennis Baxley (R-24)  dennis.baxley@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative Rich Glorioso (R-62)    rich.glorioso@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative James Grant (R-47)    james.grant@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative Gayle Harrell (R-81)    gayle.harrell@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative Charles McBurney (R-16)  charles.mcburney@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative Keith Perry (R-22)   keith.perry@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative Ray Pilon (R-69)    ray.pilon@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative John Tobia (R-31)    john.tobia@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative Carols Trujillo (R-116)   carlos.trujillo@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative Charles VanZant (R-21)  charles.vanzant@myfloridahouse.gov;


Voting
AGAINST the bill and therefore against punishing local officials for violating Florida law were:

Representative Daphne Campbell (D-108)  daphne.campbell@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative John Julian (D-104)   john.julien@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative Ari Porth (D-96)  ari.porth@myfloridahouse.gov;

Representative Perry Thurston (D-93)  perry.thurston@myfloridahouse.gov;


ABSENT: Representative Dwight Bullard (D-118)

Thanks again for all the e-mails to your Senators and Representatives.  They listen when you speak.

BACKGROUND AND WHY THESE BILLS ARE NEEDED

In 1987, the Florida Legislature passed a firearms preemption statute  (f.s.790.33) to provide uniformity of gun laws -- in fact, it is called the "Joe Carlucci Uniform Firearms Act."

It was intended to stop local governments from making criminals out of law-abiding citizens just because they simply crossed a city limit or county line.  It was intended to provide uniform gun laws so that no matter where in the state you live and no matter where in the state you travel, the same gun laws apply.

Unfortunately, the law contains no penalties for violations because no one ever imagined that local elected officials and government workers would willfully and knowingly violate state law.

The absence of penalties has lead to many intentional violations and has resulted in subsequent lawsuits to protect the rights of law-abiding citizens.

Over and over again, NRA attorneys have written letters to local governments informing them that proposed ordinances violate state law.  Unfortunately, when their lawyers confirm that the ordinance would be illegal, they usually also explain that there are no penalties for violating the law -- consequently, some jurisdictions have arrogantly thumbed their noses at state law and have passed illegal ordinances anyway.

In 2000, the City of South Miami was one of the cities that NRA lawyers wrote concerning a proposed ordinance that violated state law.

The City's external counsel confirmed that it was a violation, but also noted that there were no penalties.  We were informed that city Commissioners were told that without penalties, they could do what they wanted to do.  Further, an illegal ordinance would stand until the City was sued and a court declared the ordinance void.

The rights of law-abiding gun-owners were being violated, so NRA sued.

NRA won the lawsuit and, in fact, the appellate court even noted in its opinion that the court had previously ruled that local ordinances violate state law.

The court refused to award NRA attorney's fees.  But nobody said the City couldn't use tax dollars to pay their own expenses and pay outside counsel to defend their illegal actions.  That is egregious.

So, not only did they violate the rights of residents but then they used their tax dollars to pay the legal fees of those who intentionally did it.

It is not the NRA's responsibility to enforce state law, but nobody else will do it because there are no specified penalties.

A local attorney is currently suing Lee County for violating the state preemption law.

In the Lee County case, not only did state Representative Paige Kreegel tell them their ordinance was illegal, but then-Attorney General Bill McCollum also told them.

This has to stop!

These bills provide penalties for local officials, local governments and agencies that willfully and knowingly violate the preemption law. These penalties are severe to deter further violations.

It is clear that some jurisdictions are predisposed to violating the law in the absence of severe penalties.  That's why the bill provides felony penalties for those who willfully and knowingly participate in the violation and up to a $5 million dollar fine for the offending entity.

Sound extreme?  In 2004, the legislature passed legislation prohibiting any form of gun registration or the compiling of any lists of gun owners or guns.  The penalties are identical to those in this bill; that's why they're in this one.

Gun registration schemes, lists and data bases that violated the law suddenly were destroyed.  To our knowledge, there have been no intentional violations since that law passed. There have been no prosecutions under that law.  It has been the ultimate deterrent.  Anyone who has unintentionally violated the law has immediately taken action to come into compliance when notified.

This is not about putting people in jail or imposing big fines -- unless absolutely necessary.  We just want local public officials, elected and otherwise, to quit violating the state law and stop trampling the rights of Florida’s law-abiding gun-owners.

 

Please continue to check your e-mail and www.NRAILA.org for updates on SB 402 and HB 45.
TRENDING NOW
Gun Control May be Wasting Away, But Not Because of COVID

News  

Monday, October 19, 2020

Gun Control May be Wasting Away, But Not Because of COVID

A recent article on a gun control news site laments that the COVID-19 pandemic has thwarted ballot initiatives to expand gun bans and restrictions. Initiatives in Florida, Oklahoma, Ohio and Oregon have stalled, allegedly due to the ...

Anti-gun Politicians Seek to Tax Your Second Amendment Rights Into Oblivion

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

Anti-gun Politicians Seek to Tax Your Second Amendment Rights Into Oblivion

In 1819, Chief Justice John Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court famously wrote:  “the power to tax involves the power to destroy ….”

Anti-Gun Organization Prepared to Launch National Group of Gun Owners Who Apparently Don’t Like Guns

News  

Monday, October 19, 2020

Anti-Gun Organization Prepared to Launch National Group of Gun Owners Who Apparently Don’t Like Guns

Yes, that title doesn’t make much sense, but neither does a group that promotes banning firearms starting a national organization called Gun Owners for Safety. Nonetheless, The Hill recently reported that the anti-gun group Giffords is doing just ...

Law Professors Make Case for Second Amendment Rights in Uncertain Times

News  

Monday, October 19, 2020

Law Professors Make Case for Second Amendment Rights in Uncertain Times

Americans have made clear that they value their Second Amendment rights, especially during uncertain times. Faced with the COVID-19 pandemic and then widespread civil unrest, Americans have bought firearms in record numbers. Through September, the FBI ...

Montana: Californian-funded Fake Hunting Group Lies About Steve Bullock’s Anti-gun Record

News  

Monday, October 12, 2020

Montana: Californian-funded Fake Hunting Group Lies About Steve Bullock’s Anti-gun Record

Montana gun owners have been subjected to an abundance of lies this election season. Leading the misinformation campaign is fake hunting group Montana Hunters & Anglers Leadership Fund. Bankrolled by a wealthy San Francisco Bay ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Joe Biden Told Voters the Second Amendment DOES NOT Protect an Individual Right

News  

Monday, September 21, 2020

Joe Biden Told Voters the Second Amendment DOES NOT Protect an Individual Right

During a September 2019 “townhall” hosted by New Hampshire ABC affiliate WMUR, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden made clear that he does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms and ...

NRA Victory in Washington

Tuesday, October 20, 2020

NRA Victory in Washington

It’s rare that gun owners have something to celebrate in the Emerald City. But on Monday, the Washington Court of Appeals ruled in favor of an NRA suit on behalf of Seattle gun owners. 

Please Urge the Department of Justice to Rein in ATF's Arbitrary Determination on "Honey Badger" Pistol

News  

Monday, October 12, 2020

Please Urge the Department of Justice to Rein in ATF's Arbitrary Determination on "Honey Badger" Pistol

As we reported last week, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) recently informed firearm manufacturer Q, LLC that, in ATF’s view, Q’s “Honey Badger” pistol with stabilizing brace is actually a short-barreled rifle and ...

Judge Barrett Picks Second Amendment Case as Her “Most Significant” Ruling

News  

Monday, October 12, 2020

Judge Barrett Picks Second Amendment Case as Her “Most Significant” Ruling

The confirmation hearings of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, are due to begin on October 12th before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.