Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Respecting The Rights Of All Adults

Monday, December 13, 2010

By *** Required ***

Now that the commotion of the election season has given way to the peace of the holiday season, I hope you will find time to reflect on the blessings we enjoy as Americans—especially the courageous men and women who defend our freedoms abroad so we may enjoy this season in safety at home.

It`s troubling, though, that the freedoms they fight so selflessly to defend aren`t shared equally by all our citizens—including many of those soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines.

In the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller ruling, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment protects a fundamental, individual right for all Americans, the Court said "the American people have considered the handgun to be the quintessential self-defense weapon."

For law-abiding citizens throughout America, being able to own and carry handguns affords security from the world`s dangers. This is why NRA is backing James D`Cruz`s lawsuits against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and against the Texas Department of Public Safety, both filed Sept. 8 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

Mr. D`Cruz is 18 years old and his suits challenge federal and state laws that infringe on the Second Amendment rights of people under age 21. At the federal level, the Gun Control Act of 1968 denies 18- to 20-year-olds the right to purchase handguns from federally licensed dealers. And Texas law doesn`t allow issuance of Right-to-Carry permits to people under age 21, other than current members of the armed forces or honorably discharged veterans.

Ironically, the Gun Control Act claims, "it is not the purpose of this title to place any undue or unnecessary federal restrictions or burdens on law-abiding citizens with respect to the acquisition, possession, or use of firearms." Restricting the right of law-abiding adult citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights is both undue and unnecessary.

We should not allow these laws to circumvent what the Supreme Court has made clear in its Heller and McDonald v. Chicago rulings: the Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental, individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms for all law-abiding Americans.

And D`Cruz is certainly a law-abiding American—a responsible citizen, fully trained in the proper and safe use of firearms. He first learned to handle firearms from his grandfather, a veteran of World War ii, and continued his training as a member of the Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps, competing in regional and national marksmanship competitions.

As an 18-year-old citizen, D`Cruz should have all the rights that citizenship entails. He can vote in our elections. He can decide others` fates as a jury member. He even has to register for a potential draft under the Selective Service System. But he is denied the right to purchase or carry "the quintessential self-defense weapon" until his 21st birthday.

What`s especially troubling is that there are plenty of 18- to 20-year-olds who need to exercise their right to self-defense as much as anyone else. These adults often have very young children to protect and, since many are near the bottom of the workforce, they are more likely to live in higher-crime neighborhoods.

These young adults can join the military and put their lives on the line day after day, but upon their return, are reminded that some of the rights they fought to protect don`t apply to them.

And what about their loved ones, whom they leave behind when they fight for our freedoms? The law is clear—just like anyone else, military spouses under age 21 cannot buy handguns from licensed dealers to defend themselves when their husbands or wives are deployed in war zones halfway around the world. And in Texas and many other states, they can`t get carry permits.

Filing these cases was an important step toward guaranteeing all law-abiding citizens their fundamental freedoms. These cases are about protecting your life and your loved ones when no one else can or will.

We`re supporting D`Cruz`s lawsuits because we believe in his fundamental rights as an American citizen—rights guaranteed by the Constitution and confirmed by the Supreme Court. Federal and state law should respect his rights as well.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Handguns
TRENDING NOW
Seattle Gun Tax Fails to Generate Projected Revenue, Succeeds in Burdening Rights

News  

Gun Laws  

Friday, March 24, 2017

Seattle Gun Tax Fails to Generate Projected Revenue, Succeeds in Burdening Rights

On March 16, 2017, the Seattle Times reported that Seattle city officials were reluctant to release data on the revenue generated by the city’s firearms and ammunition tax, citing taxpayer confidentiality concerns. Less than a ...

Wisconsin: Important Right to Carry Bill Introduced

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Wisconsin: Important Right to Carry Bill Introduced

Today, LRB 2039/1 was introduced to the Wisconsin State Legislature.  This Right to Carry bill would allow for the concealed carry of a firearm without a concealed carry license anywhere in the state where an ...

Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee Embraces Heller and Originalism During Senate Hearings

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, March 24, 2017

Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee Embraces Heller and Originalism During Senate Hearings

Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, President Trump’s pick to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia on the U.S. Supreme court, asserted during his confirmation hearings this week that Scalia’s landmark Second Amendment opinion in District of ...

The Washington Post Gives Gun Control Group and U.S. Senator Three Pinocchios on Suppressors

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, March 24, 2017

The Washington Post Gives Gun Control Group and U.S. Senator Three Pinocchios on Suppressors

Last week, we wrote about Americans for Responsible Solutions’ irresponsible misinformation about The Hearing Protection Act on Twitter.  Apparently, we weren’t the only ones who took notice of ARS’s complete disregard for the facts on ...

Virginia Action Needed: Governor McAuliffe Vetoes Self-Defense Bills

Monday, March 27, 2017

Virginia Action Needed: Governor McAuliffe Vetoes Self-Defense Bills

Following their passage in the Virginia General Assembly, Governor Terry McAuliffe vetoed multiple self-defense bills; Senate Bill 1299, Senate Bill 1300, House Bill 1852, and House Bill 1853. 

California: One Gun a Month Bill Pulled from Senate Public Safety Hearing

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

California: One Gun a Month Bill Pulled from Senate Public Safety Hearing

Today, Tuesday, March 28, anti-gun SB 497, was scheduled to be heard in the Senate Public Safety Committee.  At the last minute, the bill was pulled from today's agenda. Thank you to all who contacted the ...

News  

Monday, March 27, 2017

NRA Applauds Texas State Senate for Passing SB 16

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action applauds the Texas Senate today for passing Senate Bill 16, legislation that substantially reduces License To Carry fees in the Lone Star state.

Texas: Senate Passes SB 16, LTC Fee Reduction Bill, by Overwhelming Vote

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Texas: Senate Passes SB 16, LTC Fee Reduction Bill, by Overwhelming Vote

On Monday, the Texas Senate voted to pass Senate Bill 16, NRA-backed legislation sponsored by State Sen. Robert Nichols (R-Jacksonville) and Joan Huffman (R-Houston), on a 26-5 vote.

California: Anti-Gun Bill Limiting Firearm Purchases to be Heard in Senate Public Safety on Tuesday, March 28

Friday, March 24, 2017

California: Anti-Gun Bill Limiting Firearm Purchases to be Heard in Senate Public Safety on Tuesday, March 28

On Tuesday, March 28, anti-gun SB 497, is scheduled to be heard in the Senate Public Safety Committee.  SB 497 would expand the existing one handgun a month law to include ALL guns.  

More Firearms, More Firearms Owners, Fewer Fatal Accidents

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, March 24, 2017

More Firearms, More Firearms Owners, Fewer Fatal Accidents

The National Safety Council released the 2017 edition of its annual Injury Facts report this week, and it contains welcome news about firearm safety. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.