Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Respecting The Rights Of All Adults

Monday, December 13, 2010

By *** Required ***

Now that the commotion of the election season has given way to the peace of the holiday season, I hope you will find time to reflect on the blessings we enjoy as Americans—especially the courageous men and women who defend our freedoms abroad so we may enjoy this season in safety at home.

It`s troubling, though, that the freedoms they fight so selflessly to defend aren`t shared equally by all our citizens—including many of those soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines.

In the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller ruling, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment protects a fundamental, individual right for all Americans, the Court said "the American people have considered the handgun to be the quintessential self-defense weapon."

For law-abiding citizens throughout America, being able to own and carry handguns affords security from the world`s dangers. This is why NRA is backing James D`Cruz`s lawsuits against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and against the Texas Department of Public Safety, both filed Sept. 8 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

Mr. D`Cruz is 18 years old and his suits challenge federal and state laws that infringe on the Second Amendment rights of people under age 21. At the federal level, the Gun Control Act of 1968 denies 18- to 20-year-olds the right to purchase handguns from federally licensed dealers. And Texas law doesn`t allow issuance of Right-to-Carry permits to people under age 21, other than current members of the armed forces or honorably discharged veterans.

Ironically, the Gun Control Act claims, "it is not the purpose of this title to place any undue or unnecessary federal restrictions or burdens on law-abiding citizens with respect to the acquisition, possession, or use of firearms." Restricting the right of law-abiding adult citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights is both undue and unnecessary.

We should not allow these laws to circumvent what the Supreme Court has made clear in its Heller and McDonald v. Chicago rulings: the Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental, individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms for all law-abiding Americans.

And D`Cruz is certainly a law-abiding American—a responsible citizen, fully trained in the proper and safe use of firearms. He first learned to handle firearms from his grandfather, a veteran of World War ii, and continued his training as a member of the Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps, competing in regional and national marksmanship competitions.

As an 18-year-old citizen, D`Cruz should have all the rights that citizenship entails. He can vote in our elections. He can decide others` fates as a jury member. He even has to register for a potential draft under the Selective Service System. But he is denied the right to purchase or carry "the quintessential self-defense weapon" until his 21st birthday.

What`s especially troubling is that there are plenty of 18- to 20-year-olds who need to exercise their right to self-defense as much as anyone else. These adults often have very young children to protect and, since many are near the bottom of the workforce, they are more likely to live in higher-crime neighborhoods.

These young adults can join the military and put their lives on the line day after day, but upon their return, are reminded that some of the rights they fought to protect don`t apply to them.

And what about their loved ones, whom they leave behind when they fight for our freedoms? The law is clear—just like anyone else, military spouses under age 21 cannot buy handguns from licensed dealers to defend themselves when their husbands or wives are deployed in war zones halfway around the world. And in Texas and many other states, they can`t get carry permits.

Filing these cases was an important step toward guaranteeing all law-abiding citizens their fundamental freedoms. These cases are about protecting your life and your loved ones when no one else can or will.

We`re supporting D`Cruz`s lawsuits because we believe in his fundamental rights as an American citizen—rights guaranteed by the Constitution and confirmed by the Supreme Court. Federal and state law should respect his rights as well.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Handguns
TRENDING NOW
Former Bloomberg Lackey Comes Clean on True Anti-gun Agenda

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, July 21, 2017

Former Bloomberg Lackey Comes Clean on True Anti-gun Agenda

Back when Mark Glaze was executive director of Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns, and later Everytown for Gun Safety, he went to great lengths to portray his master’s anti-gun positions as moderate. Glaze used ...

“She Persisted” – Gun Owner Fights Unlawful “No Return” Gun Policy

News  

Friday, July 21, 2017

“She Persisted” – Gun Owner Fights Unlawful “No Return” Gun Policy

On July 17, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit confirmed that law enforcement officials in New York acted unlawfully with respect to guns confiscated from a Nassau County woman in 2012.  

“March” Madness: Media Hypes Non-Event at NRA Headquarters

News  

Friday, July 21, 2017

“March” Madness: Media Hypes Non-Event at NRA Headquarters

Numbers don’t lie. But gun control groups and the news media do. That explains why so many accounts of last Friday’s so-called Women’s March From #NRA2DOJ bear no resemblance to the event those of us ...

The Need for National Reciprocity

News  

Friday, July 21, 2017

The Need for National Reciprocity

A report from the Crime Prevention Research Center estimates that the number of concealed carry permits issued last year was the largest increase ever – continuing a four year trend of record setting increases in ...

Supreme Court Asked to Review Maryland's Gun Ban

News  

Friday, July 21, 2017

Supreme Court Asked to Review Maryland's Gun Ban

A group of Maryland citizens, with the support of the National Rifle Association, filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court on Friday seeking to reverse a Court of Appeals ruling that stripped some of America’s most ...

Home Alone in Washington State

News  

Friday, July 21, 2017

Home Alone in Washington State

Back in 2013, when Washington State’s anti-gun groups rolled out Initiative 594, they promised voters this “universal background check” law would save lives by keeping “firearms out of dangerous hands” because private gun sales would ...

Court Strikes Down Unconstitutional Ban on Concealed Carry

News  

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Court Strikes Down Unconstitutional Ban on Concealed Carry

D.C. Circuit Court Rules in Favor of Constitutional Right to Carry a Gun in Public for Self-Defense

When Gun Control Fails

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, July 21, 2017

When Gun Control Fails

Gun control is pushed as a strategy to keep Americans safe in their homes, schools and workplaces. It is presented as the key component in safer streets, neighborhoods and families. But what happens when gun ...

California: DOJ Introduces Proposed Regulations Adding “Privacy Notices” to Firearm-Related Forms

Monday, July 24, 2017

California: DOJ Introduces Proposed Regulations Adding “Privacy Notices” to Firearm-Related Forms

On Monday, July 24, the California Department of Justice introduced another set of proposed regulations, this time for the purpose of adding required “privacy notices” to certain firearm-related forms.

The Danger Of A “Not In My Backyard” Mentality On Shooting Ranges

News  

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

The Danger Of A “Not In My Backyard” Mentality On Shooting Ranges

Muscatine County, Iowa, is home to about 40,000 people, and like too many places around the country, gun owners there have no public range where they can practice or compete safely. That may be changing, ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.