Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

NRA Supports H.R. 5667, The Firearms Microstamping Evaluation and Study Act

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

On July 1, 2010, U.S. Representative Dan Boren (D-Okla.) introduced H.R. 5667, the Firearms Microstamping Evaluation and Study Act. The bill would require a study (1) to determine whether a firearm could be manufactured with “microstamping” technology that would work reliably and be cost-effective for law enforcement purposes, (2) to determine the cost of “microstamping” to manufacturers, firearm owners and state governments, and (3) to determine whether “microstamping” technology could work with non-metallic cartridge cases.

Gun control supporters and vendors of “microstamping” gadgetry argue that if brand new firearms could be made with a firing pin or another internal part that could imprint a unique microscopic code onto the cartridge case of a round of ammunition fired in a firearm, and the code were entered into a computerized database, police investigators could pick up a cartridge case left at the crime scene, identify the markings on the case, run the markings against the database, and thereby identify the person that bought the firearm from which the round had been fired.

Opponents of “microstamping” raise the following objections:

  • “Microstamping” has repeatedly failed in tests. A 2006 University of California (Davis) study concluded, “it is not recommended that a mandate for implementation of this technology in all semiautomatic handguns in the state of California be made.” Results of the study were consistent with earlier peer-reviewed tests published by the Association of Firearms and Toolmarks Examiners. Firearms examiner George Krivosta, of the Suffolk County, N.Y., crime lab, found that the “vast majority” of “microstamped” characters in the alphanumeric serial number couldn’t be read on “any of the expended cartridge cases generated and examined.”
  • “Microstampings” are easily removed. In the tests noted above, common household tools were used to obliterate serial numbers in less than a minute.
  • Most gun crimes cannot be solved by “microstamping” and do not require “microstamping” to be solved. In most gun crimes no shots are fired, so there are no cartridge cases for police to recover. Also, a large percentage of guns used in crime don’t eject fired cartridge cases. Notwithstanding TV shows that portray crime-solving as impossible without advanced technology, most crimes can be solved by traditional means. For example, of murders in which the victim-offender relationship is known, 78 percent involve family members, friends and other acquaintances. Only 22 percent involve strangers.• Most criminals get guns through unregulated channels. According to the BATFE, 88 percent of the guns traced by the agency are acquired through unregulated channels, and the average time between a traced gun’s acquisition and its recovery by police is 10.8 years. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, most criminals get guns via theft or the black market.
  • “Microstamping” would increase gun thefts, home invasions and burglaries, and expand the black market in guns. Criminals would be further encouraged to get guns illegally, if guns bought legally would be linked to them in a computerized database.
  • Most guns do not automatically eject fired cartridge cases. These include revolvers, as well as pump actions, bolt actions, lever actions and several other common gun types.
    • Only a small percentage of guns would be “microstamped.” There are nearly 300 million guns in the country. New guns sold annually account for only 2 percent of that total, and new semi-automatic pistols less than 0.5 percent.
  • Most violent crimes don’t involve guns. According to the FBI, three quarters of violent crimes, including one third of murders and three fifths of robberies, are committed without guns.
  • “Microstamping” would waste money better spent on traditional crime-fighting and crime-solving efforts. The cost of a computerized database to track “microstamped” handguns would be passed along to all consumers, including law enforcement agencies.
  • Criminals could obtain fired cases from practice ranges, and use them to “seed” crime scenes, to confuse investigators. 
  • Even if it were technologically feasible, cost-effective, and useful for law enforcement purposes, a “microstamping” scheme would be utterly useless without a corresponding gun registration law, which would be strongly opposed by America’s gun owners.

While the results of the study propose in this bill cannot be predicted, studies mandated by Congress on other unproven schemes endorsed by gun control supporters have concluded that such schemes were (or would be) ineffective or counterproductive. These include (1) the Urban Institute’s study of the 1994 federal “assault weapon” ban, which found that the firearms and ammunition magazines affected by the ban had never been used in more than a fraction of all gun murders; (2) the Treasury Department’s study of ammunition, which concluded that then-Rep. Charles Schumer’s (D-N.Y.) proposal to ban commonplace hunting, target shooting and self-defense ammunition as “armor piercing” would potentially have an adverse impact on private gun owners and law enforcement officers’ safety alike; and (3) the National Academy of Sciences’ study that rejected the Clinton Administration’s proposal to embed microscopic “taggants” in gunpowder.

Additionally, studies by the Library of Congress, the National Academy of Sciences, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have concluded there is no evidence that gun control reduces criminal misuse of guns in the United States or in other countries. Other studies have shown a correlation between relaxation of gun laws and a lowering of violent crime rates, conclusions borne out by the 50 percent reduction in the nation’s murder rate since 1991, as the number of privately owned firearms concurrently increased by a third, to an all-time high.

IN THIS ARTICLE
"Micro-stamping"
TRENDING NOW
“Fact Checker:” Joe Biden’s “Gun Ban” Not a Gun Ban Because Some Guns Wouldn’t Be Banned

News  

Monday, July 15, 2019

“Fact Checker:” Joe Biden’s “Gun Ban” Not a Gun Ban Because Some Guns Wouldn’t Be Banned

Facebook has teamed up with what it calls “third-party fact-checkers” to punish users of its platform that post information embarrassing or inconvenient to the political outlook of its principals. Yet like most sources of what ...

Hollywood Fantasy v. Reality on Firearm Suppressors

News  

Monday, July 15, 2019

Hollywood Fantasy v. Reality on Firearm Suppressors

It’s no secret that Hollywood has a very loose relationship with reality.  The movie industry, after all, is based on fantasy and escapism, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing.  If someone wants to forget ...

Presidential Pretender Who Campaigned on Gun Control First to Call It Quits

News  

Monday, July 15, 2019

Presidential Pretender Who Campaigned on Gun Control First to Call It Quits

On Monday, Eric Swalwell became the first of the many pretenders for the Democrat presidential nomination to bow (or perhaps slink) out of the race. The U.S. Congressman from California’s 15th District had tried to distinguish himself from ...

California: City of San Diego Considers Gun Control Ordinance

Friday, July 12, 2019

California: City of San Diego Considers Gun Control Ordinance

San Diego City Attorney, Mara Elliott has asked the City Council to consider a draft ordinance that would require mandatory locked storage of firearms in the home and would propose a conflicting law regarding the reporting of ...

Hawaii: Governor Ige Signs Anti-Gun Legislation

Wednesday, July 10, 2019

Hawaii: Governor Ige Signs Anti-Gun Legislation

On July 9th, Governor David Ige signed the final remaining anti-gun bill awaiting his consideration, Senate Bill 600. This comes on the heels of him signing Senate Bill 1466 on June 27th. 

California: Injunction Request to be Filed in Lawsuit Challenging California Ammo Law

Wednesday, July 3, 2019

California: Injunction Request to be Filed in Lawsuit Challenging California Ammo Law

CRPA, with the support of NRA, challenged the ammunition background check law in court months ago with the filing of the Rhode v. Becerra case. The lead plaintiff in the case is Olympic gold medalist shooter ...

Vox Wants to Take Your Guns

News  

Monday, July 8, 2019

Vox Wants to Take Your Guns

A conspiracy relies on secrecy. Some are, perhaps, never uncovered. Others are exposed by the conspirators themselves, who cannot help but share the details whether from arrogance or anxiousness. For years, law-abiding gun owners and ...

NRA Statement On Virginia Special Session

News  

Tuesday, July 9, 2019

NRA Statement On Virginia Special Session

FAIRFAX, Va.–   The interim executive director of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action, Jason Ouimet, released the following statement today regarding the special session in Virginia:  "The National Rifle Association has a long ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Recent Poll Shows Gun Control Not as Popular as Some Would Like to Believe

News  

Monday, July 8, 2019

Recent Poll Shows Gun Control Not as Popular as Some Would Like to Believe

A recent Morning Consult/POLITICO poll, conducted immediately prior to the recent  Democratic debates and gathering responses from 1,991 registered voters, asked about views toward the candidates, issues of potential importance in the election, voting intention, and ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.