Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Good News, Bad News on ATF Director Dettelbach

Monday, January 6, 2025

Good News, Bad News on ATF Director Dettelbach

It’s really just good news to report that Joe Biden’s director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), Steven Dettelbach, has announced his resignation.  The bad news only comes into play for President-elect Donald Trump, because he will be denied the pleasure of firing the most political ATF director we’ve ever seen.

Dettelbach, you will recall, wasn’t Biden’s first choice to head the ATF.  That “honor” went to former ATF-employee David Chipman, who went from being an ATF field agent with a possibly questionable background to a shill for anti-gun extremists.  As opposition to Chipman mounted, his nomination failed spectacularly.  He then mounted a grievance campaign, and returned to being paid by anti-gunners to spout his anti-gun nonsense.

After Chipman came Dettelbach—a slightly less controversial but equally anti-gun extremist.  Perhaps the only positive aspect of the Dettelbach nomination was it brought forth more whining from Chipman.

Dettelbach was ultimately confirmed, and under his “leadership,” the ATF did everything it could to execute the Biden agenda of eviscerating the Second Amendment.  It also faced an incredible number of legal challenges to rules the agency implemented without corresponding legislative mandates from Congress.

Just as a refresher on how our government is supposed to work, Congress passes laws, and if the president signs them, his Executive Branch—under which ATF operates—implements the laws.  The key word here is “implements,” not “rewrites,” as in “rewrites to promote a political agenda that Congress did not consider or intend.”

Biden’s ATF, however, took it upon itself to reinterpret and rewrite a number of regulations in spite of the fact that Congress had, in every case but one, not changed the statutes under which those regulations had operated.

For example, there is the new rule regarding pistol stabilizing braces.  These firearm accessories, developed, in part, to help disabled veterans handle certain firearms more safely and with more accuracy, have been around for decades.  Since 2012, ATF had recognized that stabilizing braces serve a legitimate function and the inclusion of a stabilizing brace on a pistol or other firearm does not automatically subject that firearm to the provisions of the National Firearms Act (NFA).

In 2021, the agency began the process to reinterpret existing law to treat brace-equipped pistols the same as short-barreled rifles and fully automatic firearms, rendering them subject to NFA regulations that require enhanced screening of those who own such items, as well as registration, additional fees (taxes), and other requirements.

The rule has been challenged as unauthorized and has faced a number of legal defeats.

Then there’s the “frame or receiver” rule, which changed decades of ATF regulations regarding the definition of a “firearm”—again, without any change to the federal law under which those regulations operated.  We pointed out ATF intended to go beyond what was spelled out in federal law when a draft of the proposed rule was leaked.  We also submitted detailed comments in opposition to the proposal when it was formally published.

This rule is also facing legal challenges, and has been taken up by the Supreme Court.

Then there is team Biden/Dettelbach circumventing Congress by creatively misinterpreting the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA) to create a new rule that controls when individuals engage in sufficient commerce in firearms so as to need to be licensed under federal law as a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL). Under the rule, Biden’s ATF went well beyond statutory authority to fabricate presumptions of when an individual needs to be an FFL. The rule even hedges its bets against its own legality by claiming it is not meant to apply in criminal proceedings (the most common enforcement actions against unlicensed dealers).

This was an attempt to move the needle on Biden’s desire to implement “universal” background checks, even though the very agency that created this rule has also released data undermining the alleged efficacy of “universal” background checks to address crime involving firearms.

Twenty-six states filed suits challenging this rule, as did NRA.

Besides creatively reimagining federal firearm laws, ATF has faced scrutiny over how it has operated under Dettelbach, including a controversial operation in Arkansas the led to the death of the subject being investigated.  There were also questions asked of Dettelbach regarding an alleged ATF-linked Mexico gun trafficking scheme, raising the specter of the Obama-Biden administration’s Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

Dettelbach, apparently fancying himself as media-friendly, even took to television to push his anti-gun ATF propaganda. The results were cringe-inducing.

The fact that Dettelbach quit before he could be fired is just the final nail in the coffin of one of the most blatantly anti-gun political appointees of the Biden administration.  His resignation all but confirms his tenure had little to do with heading an agency ostensibly dedicated to public safety by targeting the most dangerous firearm-related crimes and criminals.  Otherwise, why quit?  If he were as dedicated to professional law enforcement as he claimed, one would think he would stay on, make his case with Trump, then let the chips fall where they may.

On the other hand, if his goal and mandate were to target and harass law-abiding gun owners as well as firearm manufacturers and dealers, it would make sense that he would leave before Trump took office. There is certainly no future in that line of business under the Trump-Vance administration. 

While it is a shame that President-elect Trump will not have the satisfaction of firing someone who should never have been nominated to run the ATF, it is still good he will be gone.

He will not be missed, but we look forward to seeing who will be appointed to replace him.

TRENDING NOW
U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

News  

Second Amendment  

Thursday, May 22, 2025

U.S. House Passes Reconciliation Bill, Removing Suppressors from the National Firearms Act

Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R.1 the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act, completely removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA).

Senate Finance Committee Releases Text of Reconciliation Bill

News  

Monday, June 16, 2025

Senate Finance Committee Releases Text of Reconciliation Bill

Today, the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance released its portion of the Senate version of the Reconciliation Bill. Late last month, the U.S. House passed a version of the Reconciliation Bill which included Section 2 of the ...

Gun Law Effective Dates: It’s Not Just What but When that Counts

News  

Monday, June 16, 2025

Gun Law Effective Dates: It’s Not Just What but When that Counts

The gun owning community is often saddled with a larger responsibility than most in knowing the many laws that govern gun ownership throughout the states.

Intrepid Journalist Tracks Down Truth About “Children” and Firearms, While Public Health Researchers Downplay Inconvenient Realities

News  

Monday, June 16, 2025

Intrepid Journalist Tracks Down Truth About “Children” and Firearms, While Public Health Researchers Downplay Inconvenient Realities

For decades, gun control advocates and their allies in “public health” have pushed a misleading factoid about children and firearms.

Hogg Gone from DNC

News  

Monday, June 16, 2025

Hogg Gone from DNC

Gun prohibition activist David Hogg’s time in leadership with the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has come to an end.

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Supporting NRA-Backed Challenge to IL’s Ban on “Assault Weapons” and “Large-Capacity Magazines”

Last Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in the Seventh Circuit supporting an NRA-backed challenge to Illinois’s prohibition on so-called “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

Gun-Control Window Dressing: Chicago Inspector-General Calls Out Futility of Gun Offender Registry

News  

Monday, June 16, 2025

Gun-Control Window Dressing: Chicago Inspector-General Calls Out Futility of Gun Offender Registry

Fifteen years ago, the City of Chicago adopted a “gun offender registry” ordinance that requires convicted gun offenders to register with the police and have police monitor anyone listed in the registry. 

North Carolina: Permitless Carry Bill Headed to Governor Stein

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

North Carolina: Permitless Carry Bill Headed to Governor Stein

Today, the House of Representatives voted 59-48 to pass Senate Bill 50 (S50), Freedom to Carry NC. The bill now heads to Governor Josh Stein for consideration.

Minnesota: Removal of Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Added to Environmental Omnibus Bill

Friday, June 6, 2025

Minnesota: Removal of Shotgun-Only Hunting Zones Added to Environmental Omnibus Bill

This week outside of regular session, the Environment Omnibus bill was agreed upon. This omnibus bill would remove shotgun-only hunting zones in the state. A special session has been scheduled for Monday, June 9th, for the ...

California: Anti-Gun Bills Advance in Legislature Ahead of Deadline

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

California: Anti-Gun Bills Advance in Legislature Ahead of Deadline

Friday June 6 marked the deadline for all bills to pass out of the chamber of origin. Below find an update on notable firearm related bills from this session. Legislation that passed the chamber of ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.