Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Biden Continues Railing Against the Second Amendment

Monday, September 12, 2022

Biden Continues Railing Against the Second Amendment

On August 30, President Biden emerged from about three weeks of vacation to start what appears to be a full transition from leading the country (if you could call it that) to a dedicated campaign mode.

The sparsely attended appearance in Wilkes-Barre, PA was touted as a promotion for Biden’s “Safer America Plan,” but was really just another opportunity for the president to rail against NRA, Republicans, law-abiding gun owners, semi-automatic firearms, and the Second Amendment.

Biden’s meandering, at times confusing delivery was what you would expect. He told a bunch of stories about himself and others, although they all seemed a bit too contrived, and impossible to verify. But he also told many lies, and made a few gaffes. Again, what you’d expect.

He brought up his long-stated goal of banning semi-automatic firearms, saying, “I’m determined to ban (so-called) assault weapons in this country.” He followed that up with the head-scratcher, “…I want to be clear: It’s not about taking away anybody’s guns.” So, he’s either lying about banning guns, which would, by definition, require taking them away from people, or he’s lying about “not…taking away anybody’s guns.”

He then tried to convince those attending, “But I support the Second Amendment. And I support the Second Amendment.” No matter how often he repeats this line, it remains contradicted by mounds of evidence.

Biden also stated, “Right now, you can’t go on (sic) and buy an automatic weapon. You can’t go out and buy a cannon.” The first part of that is sort of correct, but the second is totally wrong.

Yes, fully-automatic firearms are strictly regulated, and prohibitively expensive for most. But if you want to go through the tremendous amount of red tape required to lawfully procure and own one, are willing to wait anywhere from several months to more than a year for your paperwork to be processed, can find another lawful owner willing to part with one, and have the financial resources, you can buy one.

As for cannons, he’s just wrong, and he likely knows it. He has made the same outrageous claim for a number of years, originally saying you could not buy one at the time the Second Amendment was ratified. That has been proven to be false a number of times.

Now that he has dropped the historical reference, he’s still wrong. Muzzle-loading cannons, which are what most people think of when you say “cannon,” are what existed and were in common use at the time of the ratification of the Second Amendment—and even up to the Civil War and well beyond—and they are not generally prohibited under federal law.

Not satisfied with just lying, Biden then went on to ridicule anyone who opposes his anti-gun agenda, mocking their support of the Second Amendment.

His voice dripping with condescension, Biden proclaimed, “And for those brave, right-wing Americans who say it’s all about keeping America — keeping America as independent and safe: If you want to fight against a country, you need an F-15.”

While not quite as threatening as California U.S. Representative, and failed presidential candidate, Eric Swalwell (D) implying the U.S. government would use nuclear weapons against its own citizens, it’s still a rather disturbing statement to make.

In effect, Biden is saying that it is pointless for U.S. citizens to resist oppression from a tyrannical government—i.e., “keeping America…independent and safe”—because they would be overmatched against a country with its own military forces.

Biden then ran the gamut of nonsense.

First, he claimed “AR-15s just rips (sic) the body apart” of anyone shot by someone wielding one. For anyone with a basic understanding of ballistics, this statement is absurd. Not only does the standard .223 caliber projectile not “rip the body apart,” one of the consistent critiques of the 5.56x45mm cartridge is that it is relatively underpowered.

He followed his lie about AR-15s with the tired joke he’s been using for years about hunting and deer in Kevlar vests. This time, however, he added bear to the mix of animals that don’t wear Kevlar.

Not satisfied with having already shown how little he knows about firearms, he then claimed “the bullet out of an AR-15 travels five times as rapidly as a bullet shot out of any other gun.”

Not only is the cartridge fired by the AR-15 not “five times” faster than “any other gun,” it is actually slower than many other modern cartridges that fire similar weight projectiles. The 5.56x45mm cartridge is limited to around 3,200 feet per second in standard loadings out of the 20 inch or shorter barrels common to AR-15s. Cartridges like the .204 Ruger and .22-250 can push similar bullets up to and beyond 4,000 feet per second.

Of course, he also repeated the lies that he passed the ’94 ban on semi-autos (actually passed by the House and Senate, then signed by President Bill Clinton), and that the ban drove down “mass shootings (studies found no convincing evidence that such laws reduce violent crime generally or even mass shootings in particular).

But a Biden campaign speech wouldn’t be complete without a few gaffes. Throughout his rambling presentation to the small crowd in Wilkes-Barre, there were a number of instances where he mumbled semi-incoherently and trailed off as he appeared to lose his train of thought. For the most part, though, when reading from his teleprompter, he remained reasonably focused, with only a few obvious mistakes when his eyes strayed too far from the screen. At the end, though, looking away from his electronic assistant, he went full Biden.

Trying to come across as the “folksy Biden,” he asked the small gathering, “Please, please elect the Attorney General (Democrat Josh Shapiro) to the Senate. Elect that big ol’ boy (Democrat Lieutenant Governor John Fetterman) to be governor.” Of course, Biden being Biden, he mixed up the candidates and their respective races.

This appearance is likely to be a template for many Biden appearances from now until November’s midterm elections. The man who was sold as a “uniter” to voters in 2020 has completely removed that façade, and is using disdain and derision to show his utter contempt not just for the Second Amendment, but for anyone who opposes his gun-ban agenda.

All who care about freedom in this country should make note of this kind of reckless messaging, and use it to embolden themselves and others to work even harder to ensure we elect staunch defenders of the Second Amendment this coming Election Day, on November 8.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Joe Biden gun ban
TRENDING NOW
Massachusetts: Progressives Pass Radical Gun Control Bill

Friday, July 19, 2024

Massachusetts: Progressives Pass Radical Gun Control Bill

Progressive politicians in Massachusetts just passed one of the most extreme gun control bills in the country.

Massachusetts: Gov. Healey Signs Radical Gun Control Into Law

Thursday, July 25, 2024

Massachusetts: Gov. Healey Signs Radical Gun Control Into Law

On Thursday, July 25th, Governor Maura Healey (D) signed H. 4885, "an act modernizing firearm laws," one of the most extreme gun control bills in the country, into law.

Trump’s Running Mate, JD Vance, is a True Second Amendment Champion

News  

Monday, July 22, 2024

Trump’s Running Mate, JD Vance, is a True Second Amendment Champion

Last week, Sen. JD Vance (R-OH), accepted the Republican party’s nomination for vice president at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, WI.

Massachusetts: Senate Passes Sweeping Gun Control Without Public Hearing

Friday, February 2, 2024

Massachusetts: Senate Passes Sweeping Gun Control Without Public Hearing

On Thursday, February 1st, the Senate passed S.2572 late in the night without the bill ever receiving a public hearing, ignoring the concerns of Minority Leader Bruce Tarr and second amendment advocates across the state. 

NRA Scores Legal Victory Against ATF; “Pistol Brace Rule” Enjoined From Going Into Effect Against NRA Members

Monday, April 1, 2024

NRA Scores Legal Victory Against ATF; “Pistol Brace Rule” Enjoined From Going Into Effect Against NRA Members

NRA Members Among the Largest Class Protected from Draconian Rule

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging ATF’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule

News  

Second Amendment  

Monday, July 22, 2024

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging ATF’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule

The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) has filed a lawsuit challenging the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (ATF) “Engaged in the Business” Final Rule. The ATF’s Final Rule unlawfully redefines when a person ...

Appeals Court: 21+ Age Requirement for Carry Permits is Unconstitutional

News  

Monday, July 22, 2024

Appeals Court: 21+ Age Requirement for Carry Permits is Unconstitutional

In another Bruen-based invalidation of a gun law, a federal appeals court has struck a Minnesota law that prohibits 18 to 20-year-olds from being eligible for a carry permit, declaring the law to be invalid and ...

Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in NRA-ILA-Supported Challenge to Delaware’s ban on “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in NRA-ILA-Supported Challenge to Delaware’s ban on “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

On Monday, July 15, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association v. Delaware Department of Safety & Homeland Security, NRA-ILA’s lawsuit challenging ...

District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction in NRA’s Challenge to New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Law

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction in NRA’s Challenge to New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Law

Yesterday, in Ortega v. Grisham, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against New Mexico’s law requiring individuals to wait 7 ...

VA Tells Congressional Panel it “Could Not” and “Would Not” Comply with Pro-gun Legislation

News  

Monday, July 15, 2024

VA Tells Congressional Panel it “Could Not” and “Would Not” Comply with Pro-gun Legislation

Last Wednesday, the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs of the House Veterans Affairs Committee held a legislative hearing on a number of proposed bills that would change various procedures and standards for how the Department ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.