Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Fact Checkers: Biden Shooting his Mouth Off on Cannons, History, Facts and All That Stuff

Tuesday, July 6, 2021

Fact Checkers: Biden Shooting his Mouth Off on Cannons, History, Facts and All That Stuff

Professional fact checkers” at the Washington Post and elsewhere arent notable for their pro-gun bias. In the past, for example, these propagandists have condemned as incorrect claims that Hillary Clinton doesnt believe in the right to keep a gun at home for self-defense, and that Joe Biden supports gun confiscation, while using the same framework of politically desirable reality to uphold bogus gun control talking points – for instance, Bidens statements that no background checks are required for firearm purchases at gun shows, that gun manufacturers are the only entities exempt from being sued,” and that the Clinton assault weapon ban law was effective.  

Occasionally, though, there is a glimmer of veracity among the dross, as happened last week when both the Washington Post and Politifact rated President Bidens statements of June 23 as unconditionally false. 

The statements were made during a briefing with Attorney General Merrick Garland on a Gun Crime Prevention Strategy,” where Biden once again shared his thoughts on gun control and crime with the American people. Besides his now-standard demands for bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines,” his disjointed remarks (from the official transcript) included the following:

… The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldnt buy a cannon…. Those who say the blood of lib- — “the blood of patriots,” you know, and all the stuff about how were going to have to move against the government. Well, the tree of liberty is not watered with the blood of patriots. Whats happened is that there have never been — if you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons.

Biden was repeating a variation of a campaign statement he made last year – that private citizens werent allowed to own a cannon during the Revolutionary War” – which had already been debunked as false.” Questioned more closely about the reference at that time, Bidens campaign was unable to come up with an example of a law banning private ownership of cannons, and historians of the period doubt that any existed.” One historian notes that not only could a private citizen buy a cannon during the Revolutionary era, it is still legal to purchase the same type of cannon today.

Glenn Kessler, the Posts fact checker, reviewed Bidens latest claim and awarded it a four Pinocchio” rating, exceeding President Obamas previous three-Pinocchio record for inaccurate gun claims. Four is the highest possible on the mendacity meter and is reserved for whoppers,” above and beyond statements with significant factual error and/or obvious contradictions…”

Now Biden has moved the cannon metaphor to some 20 years after the Revolutionary War — and its still wrong,” writes Kessler. Moreover, Bidens interpretation especially mischaracterized” the Second Amendment. David Kopel, the research director and Second Amendment project director at the Independence Institute, was equally blunt: [e]verything in that statement is wrong.”

In the same vein, in an article titled Joe Biden gets history wrong on the Second Amendment limiting gun ownership,” the checkers at Politifact concluded that Bidens remarks completely misrepresented the scope and meaning of the Second Amendment. The purpose of the amendment, then as now, is to protect the rights of citizens, not limit them. For instance, under legal tests to determine the validity of government restrictions, the onus is on the government, not the individual, to show that the restriction is constitutional.

Further undermining Bidens assertion that the Second Amendment, from the day it was passed” regulated both the arms that could be possessed and who could possess them, Nicholas Johnson, a law professor quoted in the article, observes that the first federal gun control law does not appear until the 20th century.” Even so, as firearms law expert Stephen Halbrook points out elsewhere, the U.S. Supreme Court in the Heller case ruled that the test for determining what the Second Amendment protects is what arms are chosen by the populace for self-defense and other lawful purposes, not what arms the government allows its subjects to have.”

There are other whoppers” made by the president on June 23 that werent challenged by the fact-checkers. Also unexamined was a reference that echoed the bombast of a fellow gun-grabber who had invoked the possibility of using nuclear weapons against Americans. Back in 2018, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) warned gun owners that any fight over the Second Amendment and firearms would be a short one” because the federal government has nuclear weapons. Like Swalwell, Biden has advocated the confiscation of commonly-owned semi-automatic firearms; unlike Swalwell, Biden does presumably have access to the launch codes for Americas nuclear weapons.

According to both fact-check sources, the White House was contacted for clarification or an explanation of Bidens remarks, but to no avail. By now, Bidens outsized gift for gaffes” will likely be blamed for his supposedly well meant but fallacious forays way off the script.

However, Joe Biden is no political neophyte and he holds a law degree from Syracuse University College of Law. He isnt just cherry-picking facts that support his political narrative; he is fabricating his facts” entirely as he goes along. Whats more, he made his statements accompanied (and uncorrected) by the U.S. Attorney General, Merrick Garland, who served as a circuit judge on a federal appellate court for almost a quarter century.  

For the folks inclined to dismiss this as just another one of Bidens recurrent verbal blunders, Kessler offers this important consideration: Every U.S. president has a responsibility to get American history correct, especially when hes using a supposed history lesson in service of a political objective. The presidents push for more gun restrictions is an important part of his political platform, so he undercuts his cause when he cites faux facts.” 

The next time the Biden Administration pushes further restrictions on the constitutional rights of Americans, voters are well-advised to do some fact-checking of their own.      

TRENDING NOW
Biden Administration Bans Importation of Russian Ammunition

News  

Sunday, August 22, 2021

Biden Administration Bans Importation of Russian Ammunition

The Biden Administration’s Department of State announced that it will soon prohibit the importation of Russian ammunition into the United States. According to a release on the Department of State’s website, “[n]ew and pending permit applications ...

The Second Amendment Now Comes with Government-Issued “Harmful Language Alert”

News  

Monday, September 13, 2021

The Second Amendment Now Comes with Government-Issued “Harmful Language Alert”

The absurdity and dysfunction of the Biden Administration have become so pervasive that it’s easy to become numb to it all. But some things it does are still so outrageous and inconceivable – touching on ...

Atlantic Writer Promotes Culture War on Gun Ownership

News  

Monday, September 13, 2021

Atlantic Writer Promotes Culture War on Gun Ownership

Canadian-born political commentator and George W. Bush-era speechwriter David Frum has taken a break from promoting actual wars in the Middle East to advocate for a culture war on gun ownership here at home.

Texas: Attorney General Ken Paxton's Office Puts Woke Corporations on Notice

Friday, September 10, 2021

Texas: Attorney General Ken Paxton's Office Puts Woke Corporations on Notice

As NRA-ILA reported to you last week, a dozen new pro-Second Amendment bills took effect on September 1, including Senate Bill 19 sponsored by State Sen. Charles Schwertner (R-Georgetown) and State Rep. Gio Capriglione (R-Southlake).  Taxpayer dollars should ...

Biden Reiterates Call to Ban 9mm Handguns

News  

Monday, July 26, 2021

Biden Reiterates Call to Ban 9mm Handguns

During a July 21 CNN “presidential town hall,” Joe Biden expressed his support for a ban on commonly-owned handguns. Responding to a question about the recent increase in violent crime, the career politician stated,

Trudeau Ramps Up Gun Control Promises, Makes Guns a Wedge Issue

News  

Monday, September 13, 2021

Trudeau Ramps Up Gun Control Promises, Makes Guns a Wedge Issue

With days to go until the September 20 snap election called by Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Party leader and current Prime Minister, face the possibility of losing seats. As of early September, the Conservative Party had overtaken Trudeau’s Liberals as ...

The Truth about Radicals

News  

Monday, September 13, 2021

The Truth about Radicals

A once-reputable magazine used gunshot victims as a lever in the debate over medical treatment, using the claims of an untruthful doctor who would, apparently, say anything to advance his public health agenda.

NRA Files Comments Opposing ATF’s “Stabilizing Brace” Proposed Rule

News  

Wednesday, September 8, 2021

NRA Files Comments Opposing ATF’s “Stabilizing Brace” Proposed Rule

As we’ve previously reported, the Biden Department of Justice is threatening to upend the U.S. firearm industry and how Americans exercise their Second Amendment rights.

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

NRA Reacts to the Withdrawal of the David Chipman Nomination

News  

Thursday, September 9, 2021

NRA Reacts to the Withdrawal of the David Chipman Nomination

The NRA applauds the reported withdraw of David Chipman's nomination to head the ATF.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.