Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Fact Checkers: Biden Shooting his Mouth Off on Cannons, History, Facts and All That Stuff

Tuesday, July 6, 2021

Fact Checkers: Biden Shooting his Mouth Off on Cannons, History, Facts and All That Stuff

Professional fact checkers” at the Washington Post and elsewhere arent notable for their pro-gun bias. In the past, for example, these propagandists have condemned as incorrect claims that Hillary Clinton doesnt believe in the right to keep a gun at home for self-defense, and that Joe Biden supports gun confiscation, while using the same framework of politically desirable reality to uphold bogus gun control talking points – for instance, Bidens statements that no background checks are required for firearm purchases at gun shows, that gun manufacturers are the only entities exempt from being sued,” and that the Clinton assault weapon ban law was effective.  

Occasionally, though, there is a glimmer of veracity among the dross, as happened last week when both the Washington Post and Politifact rated President Bidens statements of June 23 as unconditionally false. 

The statements were made during a briefing with Attorney General Merrick Garland on a Gun Crime Prevention Strategy,” where Biden once again shared his thoughts on gun control and crime with the American people. Besides his now-standard demands for bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines,” his disjointed remarks (from the official transcript) included the following:

… The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldnt buy a cannon…. Those who say the blood of lib- — “the blood of patriots,” you know, and all the stuff about how were going to have to move against the government. Well, the tree of liberty is not watered with the blood of patriots. Whats happened is that there have never been — if you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons.

Biden was repeating a variation of a campaign statement he made last year – that private citizens werent allowed to own a cannon during the Revolutionary War” – which had already been debunked as false.” Questioned more closely about the reference at that time, Bidens campaign was unable to come up with an example of a law banning private ownership of cannons, and historians of the period doubt that any existed.” One historian notes that not only could a private citizen buy a cannon during the Revolutionary era, it is still legal to purchase the same type of cannon today.

Glenn Kessler, the Posts fact checker, reviewed Bidens latest claim and awarded it a four Pinocchio” rating, exceeding President Obamas previous three-Pinocchio record for inaccurate gun claims. Four is the highest possible on the mendacity meter and is reserved for whoppers,” above and beyond statements with significant factual error and/or obvious contradictions…”

Now Biden has moved the cannon metaphor to some 20 years after the Revolutionary War — and its still wrong,” writes Kessler. Moreover, Bidens interpretation especially mischaracterized” the Second Amendment. David Kopel, the research director and Second Amendment project director at the Independence Institute, was equally blunt: [e]verything in that statement is wrong.”

In the same vein, in an article titled Joe Biden gets history wrong on the Second Amendment limiting gun ownership,” the checkers at Politifact concluded that Bidens remarks completely misrepresented the scope and meaning of the Second Amendment. The purpose of the amendment, then as now, is to protect the rights of citizens, not limit them. For instance, under legal tests to determine the validity of government restrictions, the onus is on the government, not the individual, to show that the restriction is constitutional.

Further undermining Bidens assertion that the Second Amendment, from the day it was passed” regulated both the arms that could be possessed and who could possess them, Nicholas Johnson, a law professor quoted in the article, observes that the first federal gun control law does not appear until the 20th century.” Even so, as firearms law expert Stephen Halbrook points out elsewhere, the U.S. Supreme Court in the Heller case ruled that the test for determining what the Second Amendment protects is what arms are chosen by the populace for self-defense and other lawful purposes, not what arms the government allows its subjects to have.”

There are other whoppers” made by the president on June 23 that werent challenged by the fact-checkers. Also unexamined was a reference that echoed the bombast of a fellow gun-grabber who had invoked the possibility of using nuclear weapons against Americans. Back in 2018, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) warned gun owners that any fight over the Second Amendment and firearms would be a short one” because the federal government has nuclear weapons. Like Swalwell, Biden has advocated the confiscation of commonly-owned semi-automatic firearms; unlike Swalwell, Biden does presumably have access to the launch codes for Americas nuclear weapons.

According to both fact-check sources, the White House was contacted for clarification or an explanation of Bidens remarks, but to no avail. By now, Bidens outsized gift for gaffes” will likely be blamed for his supposedly well meant but fallacious forays way off the script.

However, Joe Biden is no political neophyte and he holds a law degree from Syracuse University College of Law. He isnt just cherry-picking facts that support his political narrative; he is fabricating his facts” entirely as he goes along. Whats more, he made his statements accompanied (and uncorrected) by the U.S. Attorney General, Merrick Garland, who served as a circuit judge on a federal appellate court for almost a quarter century.  

For the folks inclined to dismiss this as just another one of Bidens recurrent verbal blunders, Kessler offers this important consideration: Every U.S. president has a responsibility to get American history correct, especially when hes using a supposed history lesson in service of a political objective. The presidents push for more gun restrictions is an important part of his political platform, so he undercuts his cause when he cites faux facts.” 

The next time the Biden Administration pushes further restrictions on the constitutional rights of Americans, voters are well-advised to do some fact-checking of their own.      

TRENDING NOW
Supreme Court Signals It May Rein In Federal Rulemakers

News  

Monday, August 8, 2022

Supreme Court Signals It May Rein In Federal Rulemakers

While most of the attention from the end of the United States Supreme Court’s last term focused on several landmark cases, including a major win for gun owners in the NRA-supported case New York State Rifle ...

When Seconds Count, the Police are Only Hours Away

News  

Monday, August 8, 2022

When Seconds Count, the Police are Only Hours Away

After violent unrest and looting in 2020 that Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot admitted had “spread like wildfire” throughout parts of Chicago, the mayor nonetheless “urged Chicagoans not to take matters into their own hands in this concealed ...

Colorado Update: Boulder County Adopts Gun Control Package to Infringe Second Amendment Rights!

Thursday, August 4, 2022

Colorado Update: Boulder County Adopts Gun Control Package to Infringe Second Amendment Rights!

This week, the Boulder County Commissioners unanimously voted to pass a gun control package consisting of five ordinances to infringe on your Second Amendment rights. Commissioner Matt Jones claims these ordinances are “common-sense gun violence laws designed to ...

NRA-ILA Backed Lawsuit Challenges California’s Ban on Promoting Youth-Hunting and Youth-Shooting-Sports Programs.

Friday, August 5, 2022

NRA-ILA Backed Lawsuit Challenges California’s Ban on Promoting Youth-Hunting and Youth-Shooting-Sports Programs.

Today in an NRA-ILA-backed lawsuit, a coalition of groups that offer and promote youth-firearm safety, youth-shooting sports, and youth-hunting and hunter-education programs filed a lawsuit challenging a newly passed California statute that prohibits them from ...

AZ: Pima County Board of Supervisors To Consider Resolution Calling for Repeal of the State Firearm Preemption Statute!

Monday, August 1, 2022

AZ: Pima County Board of Supervisors To Consider Resolution Calling for Repeal of the State Firearm Preemption Statute!

Tomorrow, the Pima County Board of Supervisors will consider a resolution to repeal/challenge Arizona's preemption statutes, Resolution NO. 2022 - 44.  This resolution falls in line with efforts by both Pima County and Tucson to pass local gun ...

House-Passed Gun Ban Shows the Importance of the Election This November

News  

Monday, August 1, 2022

House-Passed Gun Ban Shows the Importance of the Election This November

On Friday, after a last-minute rule change to allow its consideration, the United States House of Representatives passed H.R. 1808.

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Trudeau’s Government Seeks Private Sector “Collection Agents” for Gun Confiscation

News  

Monday, August 1, 2022

Trudeau’s Government Seeks Private Sector “Collection Agents” for Gun Confiscation

Years after Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau unilaterally imposed his “assault weapon” ban and confiscation (“buyback”), Canada’s responsible gun owners are still waiting for his government to disclose how this “buyback” will be implemented.

California Update: Fiscal Committees Consider Remaining Anti-Gun Bills

Friday, August 5, 2022

California Update: Fiscal Committees Consider Remaining Anti-Gun Bills

This week, four anti-gun bills, AB 1227, AB 2870, SB 505 and SB 918, were heard in the respective Appropriations committees and sent to the suspense file. The Appropriations committees will take up the suspense files ...

Busting ATF’s “Myth”-Busting

News  

Monday, August 1, 2022

Busting ATF’s “Myth”-Busting

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives appears to understand that it has an image problem. According to a recent item from the Washington Times, the ATF has been handing out flyers at gun shows ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.