Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Comments Needed on Proposals to Update Export Rules, Ease Burdens on Firearm-Related Businesses

Friday, June 8, 2018

Comments Needed on Proposals to Update Export Rules, Ease Burdens on Firearm-Related Businesses

We recently reported on proposed rules announced by the Trump Administration to update the U.S. export regime for firearms and ammunition and to ease burdens and red tape on domestic firearm-related businesses, especially gunsmiths and manufacturers. Comments on these proposals are still urgently needed to help refine the final rules and ensure the voices of America’s small firearm-related businesses and gun owners are heard.

We have reported for many years on the difficulties that domestic firearm-related businesses and gun owners experience because ordinary guns and ammunition readily available on the open market and owned by many law-abiding people are classified as “defense items” for purposes of federal export laws.

For example, there is the annual registration fee, currently set at $2,250, that “manufacturers” of defense items must pay to the State Department, whether or not they export their products. This requirement falls especially heavily on small, non-exporting businesses, some of whom don’t even make complete firearms but are still required to pay the fee because their wares are considered parts, components, or accessories of regulated guns.

Then there are gunsmiths who merely work on existing firearms but are still considered “manufacturers” under the current export regime because they perform certain machining operations, which could be as simple as threading a muzzle or blueprinting the action of a firearm.

Hunters and competitors traveling overseas with personally-owned firearms have also been caught up in this regime because of Obama-era requirements to register “temporary exports” in an unwieldy government database designed around the needs of exporting businesses, not private travelers.

Bloggers, firearm writers, and handloaders posting online guides or tutorials have had their own worries about whether their activities constitute the “export” or unauthorized release of “technical data” on defense items, subjecting them to prison time and steep fines. 

Even firearm instructors teaching classes solely within the U.S. could be providing unauthorized “defense services” if their curriculums strayed into broadly-defined categories of “training” in the “use of defense articles” and their students happened to include individuals not considered “U.S. persons.”

Then, of course, there are the firearm and ammunition manufacturers who would like to compete for contracts to provide their goods or services to foreign militaries or law enforcement agencies but are stymied from competitive bids because of the considerable red tape imposed by the current rules.

In short, if your business or activities have been adversely affected by regulation of readily-available firearms and ammunition, or their components or accessories, under the Arms Export Control Act and the International Trafficking in Arms Regulations (ITAR), the government needs to hear from you.

Under the Trump proposals, most non-automatic firearms of .50 caliber or less, as well as their parts, components, accessories, and magazines of up to 50 rounds capacity, would be moved from the jurisdiction of the State Department under ITAR to the more business-friendly Commerce Department. Actual export of the items would remain closely controlled and still subject to licensing in most cases, but under more flexible rules consistent with their status as “dual-use” items that have well-established and lawful uses in non-military markets.

The easiest way to file comments is through the U.S. government’s online regulatory portal, Regulations.gov. The State Department’s proposed rule and comment form are available at this link. Use this link for the Commerce Department’s proposal. 

The most effective comments will clearly, succinctly, and respectfully relay real-world experiences with the current regime and the problems it presents. They will also address specifics of the current proposals, such as the omission of sound suppressors from the planned moves and the retention of complicated “temporary export” rules for private persons traveling abroad with personally-owned firearms. Form letters copied and pasted from the Internet are usually the least helpful type of comments, because they are not responsive to the specifics of the proposals or their real-world effects on stakeholders.

While it is fine to express general support for the proposals, the comment period is not a public referendum on whether or not they should be enacted but a chance to improve them by bringing up problems, ambiguities, or inconsistencies in the proposals themselves. In some cases, professional groups may want to pool their resources and hire outside experts to ensure their viewpoints and interests are clearly presented to the agencies. But less formal comments from individual stakeholders can also be very helpful. The Regulations.gov online portals make submitting comments as easy as sending an email.

The NRA itself has received many articulate, well-written letters and emails over the years from hunters, gunsmiths, firearm instructors, small businesses and other professionals negatively impacted by ITAR. These rulemakings are an ideal opportunity to present those same concerns and perspectives to the very officials who will be rewriting the rules to ensure they provide adequate protection to national and international security, without unduly burdening law-abiding American individuals and businesses.

Comments are due by Monday, July 9. These updates to America’s export control regime are among the most important pro-gun initiatives by the Trump administration to date. We urge you to ensure the best possible outcome with your own input.

TRENDING NOW
Illinois Committee Passes Bill to Increase Cost of FOID 1000

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Illinois Committee Passes Bill to Increase Cost of FOID 1000

On May 21st, the Illinois state House Judiciary Committee voted 12-7 to pass House Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 1966.  While it has not yet been scheduled for further action, the House may take it ...

Washington: Lawsuit Against I-1639 Proceeds After Motion To Dismiss Denied

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Washington: Lawsuit Against I-1639 Proceeds After Motion To Dismiss Denied

On May 20th, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington rejected a motion by the government defendants to dismiss the lawsuit filed by NRA and the SAF against Washington’s gun control ...

Out of Style: Levi’s Fawns Over Shannon Watts in Pantmaker’s Latest Gun Control Effort

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Out of Style: Levi’s Fawns Over Shannon Watts in Pantmaker’s Latest Gun Control Effort

At the National Retail Federation’s 2018 convention in New York City, Levi Strauss & Co. Brand President James Curleigh told those assembled that the multinational pants manufacturer intends to be the “most relevant lifestyle brand.” Evidently, part ...

Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Only What We Want Ye to Hear

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Only What We Want Ye to Hear

Can we finally put the claim that “gun violence” research is underfunded to rest? The Bloomberg Professor of American Health at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University, Daniel Webster, and his colleagues at the Hopkins ...

California: Firearm Excise Tax Bill Fails to Meet Fiscal Deadline While Other Gun Control Bills Move Forward

Monday, May 20, 2019

California: Firearm Excise Tax Bill Fails to Meet Fiscal Deadline While Other Gun Control Bills Move Forward

Last week, the Assembly and Senate Appropriations Committees took up their respective suspense files ahead of the Friday, May 17, fiscal deadline. Some of the more egregious gun bills failed to meet the deadline including ...

Trump Administration, Other Pro-Gun Heavyweights Lend Support on Pending Supreme Court Case

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Trump Administration, Other Pro-Gun Heavyweights Lend Support on Pending Supreme Court Case

As NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox reported in March, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a challenge by an NRA state affiliate to a New York City gun control scheme that effectively prohibits lawfully ...

Gov. Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Gov. Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) applauded Gov. Greg Abbott on Thursday for signing NRA-backed legislation that protects tenants’ rights by prohibiting “no firearms” clauses in residential leases.   

Illinois: Committee To Receive FOID Cost Increase Legislation

Friday, May 17, 2019

Illinois: Committee To Receive FOID Cost Increase Legislation

On May 21st, the Illinois state House of Representatives Rules Committee will hear House Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 1966 and send it to the Judiciary Committee for further consideration.  HA 1 to SB 1966 would ...

Working Together to Save the Second Amendment Part II: State Success Stories

News  

Hunting  

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Working Together to Save the Second Amendment Part II: State Success Stories

When I started with NRA in 1995, most of the attention our organization received was over legislative efforts in Congress. Firearm-related legislation at the federal level obviously has an impact on far more law-abiding gun ...

Retired Justice Stevens Continues Crusade Against Guns

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Retired Justice Stevens Continues Crusade Against Guns

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens does not believe a law-abiding citizen has a right to possess firearms under the Second Amendment, and he wants to make sure everyone knows it. He made his ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.