Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Pro-Second Amendment Justice Neil M. Gorsuch Joins U.S. Supreme Court

Thursday, June 1, 2017

Pro-Second Amendment Justice Neil M. Gorsuch Joins U.S. Supreme Court

Seventy-seven days into his administration, President Donald J. Trump delivered on his most important campaign promise to gun owners: nominating a Supreme Court justice who respects the Second Amendment.

The appointment of 49-year-old Neil M. Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court on April 6, 2017 did more than just preserve the narrow five-vote majority that recognized a fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms beginning with the landmark Heller case in 2008. It meant that the Framers’ vision of constitutional freedom will have a voice on the court for decades to come.

Judge Gorsuch’s confirmation was the culmination of a dramatic series of events that began with Justice Antonin Scalia’s sudden, unexpected death on Feb. 13, 2016. Scalia’s opinion in Heller was a triumph of the judicial philosophy known as originalism. He meticulously mustered historical sources to interpret the actual text of the Second Amendment as it would have been publicly understood at the time of its enactment.

This not only resulted in the end of Washington, D.C.’s draconian handgun ban and the requirement that residents store all other guns in an unusable state, it built a solid foundation for future consideration of the Second Amendment by directing courts to look to the provision’s origins to discern its meaning. Lower courts could not simply claim, “That was then. This is now. Things have changed.”   The appointment of 49-year-old Neil M. Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court on April 6, 2017 did more than just preserve the narrow five-vote majority that recognized a fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms beginning with the landmark Heller case in 2008. It meant that the Framers’ vision of constitutional freedom will have a voice on the court for decades to come.

 

Not that they haven’t tried to do exactly that in the years since Heller was decided.

And that made the question of who would replace Scalia that much more important. Protection of the Second Amendment requires a jurist who understands and will apply Scalia’s analytical methods to future cases invoking that right.

That is why for the NRA and for gun owners in general, the future of the U.S. Supreme Court was THE key issue in the 2016 election.  The very future of our firearms freedom was at stake.

The candidates’ positions on the Second Amendment, moreover, could not have been more starkly different.

Hillary Clinton had insisted on the campaign trail that the Heller court was “wrong on the Second Amendment.”  She took every opportunity to discuss, at length, her support of gun control while campaigning for the White House.

Donald Trump, meanwhile, released a Second Amendment Rights position paper on his campaign website that began: “The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.”

And both emphasized that their views on the Second Amendment would figure into their judicial appointments.

After his victory in November, President Trump kept his promise by nominating Gorsuch, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit with an impeccable record and reputation.

In the intense media and political scrutiny that followed Trump’s selection, there was never any serious argument against Judge Gorsuch’s credentials, integrity, and ability. He has been praised by legal professionals across the political spectrum.

And there was also no doubt that he was a staunch originalist, just as Scalia himself had been.

Anti-gun factions in the Democratic Party – incensed over the outcome of the election and Trump’s opportunity to replace Scalia – reacted with blind fury, launching the first partisan filibuster against a Supreme Court nominee in U.S. history to try to block Judge Gorsuch’s nomination.

In practical terms, that strategy gained them nothing.

Senate Republicans responded by applying the same Senate rules instituted by then Majority Leader Harry Reid (NV-D) in 2013.  At that time, Reid pushed through the elimination of the Senate filibuster on executive appointments and lower-court nominees. The “Reid Rule” now applies to Supreme Court nominations as well, a fact for which Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) – who called for the partisan filibuster – is primarily responsible.

Ultimately, Judge Gorsuch was confirmed by a bipartisan 54-45 vote.

While there may be no end to the hypocrisy, rancor, and obstruction that Schumer and like-minded anti-gun partisans are willing to inflict on the American political process, all citizens of goodwill can rest assured that Judge Gorsuch will uphold the law with the highest standards of professionalism and impartiality.

And Second Amendment advocates in particular can sleep soundly knowing that when the Supreme Court again hears a case on the right to keep and bear arms, Justice Scalia’s seat will be occupied by a man similarly dedicated to ensuring that the Framers’ vision of constitutional freedom is upheld.

Chris W. Cox

BY Chris W. Cox

NRA-ILA Executive Director

Follow This Contributor

Chris W. Cox has served as the executive director of the Institute for Legislative Action, the political and lobbying arm of NRA, since 2002. As NRA’s principal political strategist, Cox oversees eight NRA-ILA divisions: Federal Affairs; State & Local Affairs; Public Affairs; Grassroots; Finance; Research & Information; Conservation, Wildlife & Natural Resources; and Office of Legislative Counsel. Cox also serves as chairman of NRA’s Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF), the Association’s political action committee; president of the NRA Freedom Action Foundation (NRA-FAF), which focuses on non-partisan voter registration and citizen education; and chairman of NRA Country, an effort to bring country music artists together with NRA members in support of our Second Amendment freedoms and hunting heritage.

TRENDING NOW
NJ Court: State Can’t Criminalize Possession of “Pencils” and Other Lawful Objects for Home Self-defense

News  

Friday, June 16, 2017

NJ Court: State Can’t Criminalize Possession of “Pencils” and Other Lawful Objects for Home Self-defense

It is refreshing to finally see some common sense coming out of a court in NJ, as the state is notoriously known for its illogical and Draconian gun laws that do little more than make ...

Goodyear Fires Australian Competitive Shooter over Simple Miscommunication

News  

Friday, June 16, 2017

Goodyear Fires Australian Competitive Shooter over Simple Miscommunication

In the United States there have been a handful of high-profile incidents in which an employer has terminated an employee following the employee’s use of a gun in self-defense while at the workplace. In recent ...

Delaware: Hearing Scheduled for Radical Gun Seizure Legislation

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Delaware: Hearing Scheduled for Radical Gun Seizure Legislation

Tomorrow, the House Administration Committee is scheduled to consider House Bill 222.

Ohio: Pro-Gun Bills Scheduled for Committee Hearing Tomorrow

Monday, June 19, 2017

Ohio: Pro-Gun Bills Scheduled for Committee Hearing Tomorrow

  Tomorrow, June 20, several Second Amendment-related bills are scheduled to be heard in the House Committee on Federalism and Interstate Relations.  Please contact the committee members in support of the following pro-gun bills!

Rotary Turns 180 Degrees on Restrictive Firearm Policies

News  

Friday, June 16, 2017

Rotary Turns 180 Degrees on Restrictive Firearm Policies

In March, we reported on a series of restrictive policies governing firearms that had been approved by the governing body of the well-known networking and service club, Rotary International. This week came a welcome turn ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

California: Pre-Litigation Letter Sent to DOJ Opposing “Bullet Button Assault Weapon” Regulations

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

California: Pre-Litigation Letter Sent to DOJ Opposing “Bullet Button Assault Weapon” Regulations

On Monday, June 19, the NRA and CRPA’s legal team submitted a joint-letter to the California Department of Justice (DOJ) and Office of Administrative law demanding that the regulations be withdrawn or not approved as the regulations exceed ...

Why The United States Needs To Unite On Carry Reciprocity

News  

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Why The United States Needs To Unite On Carry Reciprocity

In an educational op-ed posted Thursday at newyorkdailynews.com, criminologist and author John Lott makes the case that the previous day’s shooting at a GOP Congressional baseball practice proves why the country needs national Right-to-Carry reciprocity.

UK: Police Commissioner Suggests Value of Armed Citizenry, is Quickly Rebuffed

News  

Friday, June 16, 2017

UK: Police Commissioner Suggests Value of Armed Citizenry, is Quickly Rebuffed

Every once in a great while, an independent-minded United Kingdom official is overcome with a bout of common sense on firearms. However, such outbursts of reason are typically short-lived, as the gun control apostate becomes ...

Delaware: Anti-Gun Bill Hearing Cancelled

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Delaware: Anti-Gun Bill Hearing Cancelled

Today, thanks to your calls and emails, the Delaware House Administration Committee cancelled its hearing on anti-gun House Bill 222.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.