Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Minnesota Hunters: Discover the Truth Regarding the Misleading Campaign Designed to Ban Lead Ammunition

Saturday, March 1, 2014

The Minnesota Chapter of the Wildlife Society recently held a panel discussion in Bemidji to discuss banning the use of lead ammunition for hunting.  The panelists included researchers, state Department of Natural Resources personnel, and representatives of various non-profit organizations.  Numerous comments were made by some Minnesota Department of Natural Resources personnel expressing their belief that using lead ammunition for hunting should not be allowed.  This should concern Minnesota hunters greatly.                                                   

 

We need your help NOW.  To preserve our traditional hunting heritage in Minnesota, the National Rifle Association asks all hunters, recreational shooters, gun owners, and true conservationists to oppose a ban on lead ammunition for hunting.  Contact the Minnesota DNR and tell them that you oppose any attempt to ban lead ammunition for hunting.

  

In 2007, the first hastily-enacted ban on lead ammunition (Assembly Bill (AB) 821) for game hunting was passed in California.  It banned the use of lead ammunition for hunting game in the California condor habitat (aka the “condor zone”).  Despite the California Department of Fish & Wildlife’s acknowledgment that 99% of hunters are complying with the lead ammunition ban in the “condor zone” since the law took effect, the rate of condor lead poisoning and mortality actually increased since 2007!  This failure to reduce condor blood-lead levels, poisoning and mortality suggests that lead ammunition used for hunting was not the source of lead poisoning of condors.

 

Nonetheless, California recently passed AB 711 expanding AB 821, and lead ammunition ban proponents now cite to the California law to support the expansion of their campaign into Minnesota.  In California, AB 711 will expand the lead ammunition ban by 2019 for all hunting throughout California.  Anti-lead ammunition advocacy groups claim that the passage of this California law is evidence for the need to ban lead ammunition throughout the U.S.

 

In California, these groups first used faulty science, scare tactics, and political demagoguery to claim that lead ammunition from hunting was a threat to the California condor.   When they realized that these tactics were not getting enough political traction, they expanded their claims to incredibly assert that using lead ammunition for hunting is a significant threat to human health as well, which is simply not true.

 

They hope that Minnesota is next in line to ban traditional ammunition.  Some of these California lead ammunition ban proponents are using the same questionable science and scare tactics to claim that hunters’ lead ammunition presents serious health risk threats to the Bald Eagle, Minnesota hunters and their families.  Lead ammunition ban proponents will not stop until Minnesota becomes the next state to ban lead ammunition for all hunting, or until you stop them!

 

Please forward this alert to your family, friends, fellow sportsmen, conservationists and gun owners throughout Minnesota and ask them to do the same.  Contact information for the Minnesota DNR can be found here.

 

Learn the facts and real truth behind the all out assault on lead ammunition throughout the United States.  The anti-lead ammunition advocates want to ban all lead ammunition both at ranges and in the field, and they want to ban all hunting.  One of the primary sponsors of the state-wide lead ammunition ban in California  has said: “We are going to use the ballot box and the democratic process to stop all hunting in the United States.  We will take it species by species until all hunting is stopped in California.  Then we will take it state by state.” (Humane Society of the United States President and CEO Wayne Pacelle)  They have “temporarily” accomplished the California part, don’t let Minnesota be next!

 

Lead ammunition ban proponents claim there is “safe” alternative ammunition (non-lead) available.  But the truth is that ammunition made with alternative metals such as copper are not the safest.  Advocates of lead ammunition bans routinely ignore the serious environmental consequences from copper, tungsten and other metals used in alternative ammunition. Alternative ammunition containing bismuth, tungsten or copper coated steel all present environmental concerns.  Bismuth leaches into the soil and groundwater and interferes with soil bacteria.  Tungsten, which is transformed to a soluble form by oxygen, accumulates in the spleen of wildlife and can cause immune system disorders.  Steel shot does not perform as well as lead on game, leading to higher numbers of crippled game left to bleed-out and die in the field.  Even copper is toxic under certain circumstances.  Consequently, traditional ammunition containing lead is still the best, most economical and safest ammunition available.

 

Contrary to the disparaging claims against hunters by the lead ammunition ban and anti-hunting groups, hunters are the true conservationists.  Hunters pay fees and taxes at both the state and federal level.  On the state level, hunters pay for license fees and game tags.  This money is used by the state fish and wildlife agencies to fund their administration, programs, and projects.  State agencies also receive federal funds from the Pittman-Robertson Act, through excise taxes placed on firearms and ammunition.  Federal agencies receive revenue from the sale of Duck Stamps, required for waterfowl hunting.  This funding goes to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to help fund land acquisitions for the National Wildlife Refuge System.  Additionally, both USFWS and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) can charge hunters a fee for hunting on wildlife refuge and national forest lands.  This revenue almost entirely covers the costs of administering hunting programs by USFWS and USFS.

 

In addition to funding conservation measures, in the field, hunters help Fish and Wildlife Departments with wildlife counts, suggest enhancements for better game management, and assist with monitoring and apprehending poachers and others harming the environment.  In short, do not be mislead by these so-called environmental groups that push their extremist agendas against lead ammunition and hunting.

 

To stay up to date on the lead ammunition debate, visit NRA-ILA and subscribe at  HuntForTruth.org to find out the truth regarding lead ammunition, and exposing the misinformation being spread by the lead ammunition ban and anti-hunting proponents in their campaign to ban lead ammunition and hunting.

 

IN THIS ARTICLE
Minnesota lead ammunition ban
TRENDING NOW
Wisconsin: Important Right to Carry Bill Introduced

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Wisconsin: Important Right to Carry Bill Introduced

Today, LRB 2039/1 was introduced to the Wisconsin State Legislature.  This Right to Carry bill would allow for the concealed carry of a firearm without a concealed carry license anywhere in the state where an ...

California: One Gun a Month Bill Pulled from Senate Public Safety Hearing

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

California: One Gun a Month Bill Pulled from Senate Public Safety Hearing

Today, Tuesday, March 28, anti-gun SB 497, was scheduled to be heard in the Senate Public Safety Committee.  At the last minute, the bill was pulled from today's agenda. Thank you to all who contacted the ...

Texas: Senate Passes SB 16, LTC Fee Reduction Bill, by Overwhelming Vote

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Texas: Senate Passes SB 16, LTC Fee Reduction Bill, by Overwhelming Vote

On Monday, the Texas Senate voted to pass Senate Bill 16, NRA-backed legislation sponsored by State Sen. Robert Nichols (R-Jacksonville) and Joan Huffman (R-Houston), on a 26-5 vote.

Seattle Gun Tax Fails to Generate Projected Revenue, Succeeds in Burdening Rights

News  

Gun Laws  

Friday, March 24, 2017

Seattle Gun Tax Fails to Generate Projected Revenue, Succeeds in Burdening Rights

On March 16, 2017, the Seattle Times reported that Seattle city officials were reluctant to release data on the revenue generated by the city’s firearms and ammunition tax, citing taxpayer confidentiality concerns. Less than a ...

Virginia Action Needed: Governor McAuliffe Vetoes Self-Defense Bills

Monday, March 27, 2017

Virginia Action Needed: Governor McAuliffe Vetoes Self-Defense Bills

Following their passage in the Virginia General Assembly, Governor Terry McAuliffe vetoed multiple self-defense bills; Senate Bill 1299, Senate Bill 1300, House Bill 1852, and House Bill 1853. 

News  

Monday, March 27, 2017

NRA Applauds Texas State Senate for Passing SB 16

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action applauds the Texas Senate today for passing Senate Bill 16, legislation that substantially reduces License To Carry fees in the Lone Star state.

Georgia: Senate Passes Pro-Gun Bills – Governor Needs to Hear From You!

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Georgia: Senate Passes Pro-Gun Bills – Governor Needs to Hear From You!

Today, the Georgia Senate passed pro-gun bills; House Bill 406, House Bill 292, and House Bill 280. 

Kentucky: Senate Passes Pro-Gun Committee Substitute

Thursday, March 30, 2017

Kentucky: Senate Passes Pro-Gun Committee Substitute

Today, the Kentucky Senate passed a substituted version of House Bill 417.

Illinois: Firearm Dealer Licensing Bill Passed Out of Committee

Thursday, March 30, 2017

Illinois: Firearm Dealer Licensing Bill Passed Out of Committee

Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee passed Senate Bill 1657.  This onerous legislation will now go to the Senate floor where it will await full consideration. 

The Washington Post Gives Gun Control Group and U.S. Senator Three Pinocchios on Suppressors

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, March 24, 2017

The Washington Post Gives Gun Control Group and U.S. Senator Three Pinocchios on Suppressors

Last week, we wrote about Americans for Responsible Solutions’ irresponsible misinformation about The Hearing Protection Act on Twitter.  Apparently, we weren’t the only ones who took notice of ARS’s complete disregard for the facts on ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.