Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

A Return to Sanity? Lawmakers Push Back Against Zero-Tolerance Abuses

Friday, February 7, 2014

We've all seen warning labels on products that leave us scratching our heads and wondering, is that really necessary?  A popular sleeping pill, for example, cautions it may cause drowsiness.  Chainsaws have stickers admonishing users not to hold the saw by the blade.  A certain hand-held hairdryer even contains an advisory that it is not for use while sleeping.

Although most people could figure these things out for themselves, many of these labels likely come with a back story too bizarre for ordinary imaginations to conceive.

Such is the case with  Florida HB 7029, which on Wednesday passed out of the House Education K-12 Subcommittee by a 13-0 vote on its way to introduction.  Some are simply calling it the "Pop-Tart" Bill or the "Right to be Kids" Act.  We might well wish that those who educate and oversee America's children during the school day would instinctively understand that a toaster pastry could not reasonably be mistaken for a handgun, but a mounting list of back stories have unfortunately proven otherwise. Thus, HB 7029 emphasizes the need for often well-intentioned but increasingly overzealous educators to pause, take a breath, and consider the facts before mindlessly applying "zero tolerance" disciplinary polices aimed at keeping harmful weapons out of schools.

A number of illustrative absurdities have been chronicled on this site and the pages of other media outlets.  Besides the infamous Pop Tart incident, students have received suspensions and other harsh disciplinary actions, sometimes involving the police, for such "infractions" as pointing pencils or fingers at each other while making "shooting" sounds, drawing a stick figure with a gun (and a water gun at that, according to the seven-year-old "perpetrator"), and having a picture of a gun as a screensaver on a computer.  Students have also been punished--and, yes, arrested--for incidents arising out of NRA or firearm-themed t-shirts.  Not only are graphics on cloth objectively unable to cause physical harm, such attire can be constitutionally protected speech, according to prominent civil rights attorney Chuck Michel.

It's enough to make a person think that what's really being punished is any action or expression that suggests the idea of a gun, even if it is not disruptive or threatening.  In other words, what started out as policies aimed at gun crime have degenerated into a form of thought crime.

Thanks to this long train of abuses, HB 7029 would enshrine in statute the principle: "Simulating a firearm or weapon while playing or wearing clothing … that depict[s] a firearm or weapon or express[es] an opinion regarding a right guaranteed by the Second  Amendment  … is not grounds for  disciplinary action or referral [for prosecution]" under Florida statutes that prohibit "[b]ringing a firearm or weapon … to school …."  The bill goes further by specifically mentioning examples of presumptively innocent conduct, including "[b]randishing a partially consumed pastry … [v]ocalizing an imaginary firearm or weapon … [or] [d]rawing a picture, or possessing an image, of a firearm or weapon." 

The bill is not, however, intended to create yet another legislative straightjacket and allows educators to take into account the individual circumstances of an event.  Thus, they can still act if a simulation "substantially disrupts student learning, causes bodily harm to another person, or places another person in reasonable fear of bodily harm."  The bill also does not prohibit schools from adopting a policy requiring the wearing of uniforms.

Florida, moreover, is not the only state to be considering a bill of this sort.  A similar measure is pending in Oklahoma.   

We don't celebrate the fact that egg cartons now bear the warning, "This product may contain eggs."  Similarly, the abuses that necessitated these bills do not speak well of level-headedness (or the lack thereof) in today's schools.  We can only hope that these measures will have a moderating effect well beyond their jurisdictions and remind all concerned of the need for simple commonsense and the recognition that while kids will be kids, adults should aim higher with their own decision making.

TRENDING NOW
Washington: NRA Files Legal Challenge Against Misleading Ballot Title for Gun Control Initiative

Thursday, May 17, 2018

Washington: NRA Files Legal Challenge Against Misleading Ballot Title for Gun Control Initiative

Yesterday, NRA filed a legal challenge in the Thurston County Superior Court objecting to the misleading and inadequate ballot title for Initiative 1639, which seeks to further restrict the Second Amendment rights of Washington's law-abiding citizens.  The Thurston ...

Massachusetts: Anti-Second Amendment Bills Rolled into Committee Substitute

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Massachusetts: Anti-Second Amendment Bills Rolled into Committee Substitute

On May 23rd, the Massachusetts state House of Representatives will be voting on House Bill 4517, which would allow firearms to be seized from individuals following baseless accusations without proper due process.

Hard Times for Dick's as Second Amendment Supporters Respond to Company’s Anti-Gun Bent

Hunting  

News  

Friday, May 11, 2018

Hard Times for Dick's as Second Amendment Supporters Respond to Company’s Anti-Gun Bent

We have recently been reporting on the bizarre anti-gun activism of one of the nation’s larger firearm retailers, Dick’s Sporting Goods and its affiliated Field & Stream stores. First, the company announced it would stop selling most centerfire semi-automatic ...

Illinois: Gun Control Bills to be Heard This Week

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Illinois: Gun Control Bills to be Heard This Week

The Illinois state House of Representatives can take action any day on House Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 2580 to expand the 72 hour waiting period to all firearms.  On May 24th, the Illinois state ...

Sorry, Alyssa, But We're Glad We Came

News  

Friday, May 11, 2018

Sorry, Alyssa, But We're Glad We Came

You likely recall we mentioned a new anti-gun organization recently formed, which was billed as the brainchild of actress Alyssa Milano.  You may also recall that we reported her group, NoRA, had made the vaguely threatening proclamation, ...

Anti-Gun Democrat Proposes Banning Semi-Autos and Going After "Resisters"

News  

Friday, May 11, 2018

Anti-Gun Democrat Proposes Banning Semi-Autos and Going After "Resisters"

The headline of the USA Today op-ed said it all. Anti-gun Congressman Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) last week advocated for legislation to ban an as-yet undetermined class of semi-automatic firearms and to “go after resisters” who refuse to relinquish their ...

News  

Friday, April 27, 2018

NRA Statement on Yeti

The National Rifle Association released the following statement from in response to Yeti’s inaccurate statements:

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

ALERT! Can't Wait for Your YETI Cover Up Stickers?

Approximately 100,000 free stickers, proudly displaying the message "I STAND WITH THE NRA FOUNDATION," were distributed at the NRA Annual Meeting in Dallas, Texas last week.  These stickers were designed to cover up the YETI ...

New Jersey Action Needed: Senate Committee Passes Multiple Gun Control Bills

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

New Jersey Action Needed: Senate Committee Passes Multiple Gun Control Bills

Yesterday, the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee considered and passed multiple anti-gun measures. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.