Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Florida: Letter to the Leon County Commissioners Stating Ordinance Could Lead to Gun Ban and/or Confiscation

Friday, November 15, 2013

The Gun Writer, Lee Williams, of the Herald-Tribune commented on his blog, Hammer: Leon County ordinance could lead to gun ban, confiscation on past NRA President and Executive Director of Unified Sportsmen of Florida Marion Hammer’s letter to the Leon County Board of Commissioners. 

 

Lee's note: USF Executive Director Marion Hammer sent a blunt letter to the Leon County commissioners this week, who are drafting their own gun bill and pressuring licensed dealers for help.

Two things stand out.

Hammer says if the county's gun dealer's balk at the bill, it becomes a de facto ban on private sales. More troublesome, some of the small print could actually require gun dealers to confiscate firearms from individuals.”

Below is a copy of Ms. Hammer's letter to the Leon County Commissioners:

Commissioners,

I keep hearing that you need more information, more discussion so let me try
to help you with that.

FIRST:  Have any of you actually asked Sheriff Campbell for his opinion on whether he thinks this ordinance is a good idea or whether or not it is needed?

We all know that if you pass an ordinance, he will have no choice other that to try to enforce it -- BUT he's the top law enforcement officer the county so don't you think somebody should ask him for his advice?

SECOND: Leon County can't implement this ordinance if FFLs refuse to participate.

If dealers refuse to participate, the ordinances would then be a defacto ban on private sales  by collectors and private citizens at gun shows and at any place to which the public has the right of access.

Dealers SHOULD refuse to participate because you would be putting them in a
bad legal position and cause problems for dealers. You will be pitting them
against their customers and their friends and neighbors.

If you read the letter from county attorney  sent to dealers then you know you are putting dealers in a horrible position.

Under the ordinance, the dealer would have to take the firearm from the seller.  It has to be transferred into the dealer's inventory before doing a background check.

The dealer would conduct a background check through FDLE -- the access point
to NICS.

If FDLE/NICS denies the sale because the check on the purchaser comes back
ineligible, the dealer has to then do a background check on seller before they can return his personal private property to him.

If FDLE/NCIS denies the transfer back to the seller claiming the seller is ineligible for transfer, then the dealer is required to confiscate the seller's personally owned firearm.

I can see really bad things arising from this situation, and no dealer in their right mind wants to be put into the position of confiscating a private firearm.

Commissioners should not want to be a party to an ordinance that can lead to
CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE FIREARMS.

NICS database and background checks are notoriously inaccurate, so suddenly a
private businessman is confiscating firearms, because you imposed an ordinance
forcing a private a seller to sign his private firearm over to the dealer for
purposes of the transaction.

Further, nobody seems to know what a dealer is supposed to do with the firearm once he has confiscated it.  It doesn't belong to him.  He can't sell it.  He can't give it away.  Does he just hold it forever?

Does he turn it over to the Sheriff so that the Sheriff is responsible for confiscated firearms?

Does he turn it over the Board of County Commissioners?  It's your ordinance.  Do you want the confiscated firearms?

If a private citizen is put in this position and his private firearm confiscated because of a mistake who will he bring legal action against?

This is a bad idea and the sooner you kill it the better.

Marion  Hammer
Past President NRA
Executive Director Unified Sportsmen of Florida

IN THIS ARTICLE
Florida Gun Shows
TRENDING NOW
Out of Style: Levi’s Fawns Over Shannon Watts in Pantmaker’s Latest Gun Control Effort

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Out of Style: Levi’s Fawns Over Shannon Watts in Pantmaker’s Latest Gun Control Effort

At the National Retail Federation’s 2018 convention in New York City, Levi Strauss & Co. Brand President James Curleigh told those assembled that the multinational pants manufacturer intends to be the “most relevant lifestyle brand.” Evidently, part ...

Trump Administration, Other Pro-Gun Heavyweights Lend Support on Pending Supreme Court Case

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Trump Administration, Other Pro-Gun Heavyweights Lend Support on Pending Supreme Court Case

As NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox reported in March, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a challenge by an NRA state affiliate to a New York City gun control scheme that effectively prohibits lawfully ...

Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Only What We Want Ye to Hear

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Only What We Want Ye to Hear

Can we finally put the claim that “gun violence” research is underfunded to rest? The Bloomberg Professor of American Health at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University, Daniel Webster, and his colleagues at the Hopkins ...

Gov. Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Gov. Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) applauded Gov. Greg Abbott on Thursday for signing NRA-backed legislation that protects tenants’ rights by prohibiting “no firearms” clauses in residential leases.   

Retired Justice Stevens Continues Crusade Against Guns

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Retired Justice Stevens Continues Crusade Against Guns

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens does not believe a law-abiding citizen has a right to possess firearms under the Second Amendment, and he wants to make sure everyone knows it. He made his ...

Illinois Committee Passes Bill to Increase Cost of FOID 1000

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Illinois Committee Passes Bill to Increase Cost of FOID 1000

On May 21st, the Illinois state House Judiciary Committee voted 12-7 to pass House Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 1966.  While it has not yet been scheduled for further action, the House may take it ...

California: Firearm Excise Tax Bill Fails to Meet Fiscal Deadline While Other Gun Control Bills Move Forward

Monday, May 20, 2019

California: Firearm Excise Tax Bill Fails to Meet Fiscal Deadline While Other Gun Control Bills Move Forward

Last week, the Assembly and Senate Appropriations Committees took up their respective suspense files ahead of the Friday, May 17, fiscal deadline. Some of the more egregious gun bills failed to meet the deadline including ...

Nevada: Omnibus Anti-Gun Bill Granted Waiver From Deadlines

Saturday, May 18, 2019

Nevada: Omnibus Anti-Gun Bill Granted Waiver From Deadlines

As previously alerted, yesterday was the deadline for legislation to pass out of the policy committee in the second chamber.  A waiver was granted for Assembly Bill 291, exempting the bill from the deadlines.  This waiver ...

Illinois: Committee To Receive FOID Cost Increase Legislation

Friday, May 17, 2019

Illinois: Committee To Receive FOID Cost Increase Legislation

On May 21st, the Illinois state House of Representatives Rules Committee will hear House Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 1966 and send it to the Judiciary Committee for further consideration.  HA 1 to SB 1966 would ...

NRA Supports Guns Save Life's Challenge to Illinois’s FOID Act

News  

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

NRA Supports Guns Save Life's Challenge to Illinois’s FOID Act

NRA is supporting a legal challenge to Illinois's FOID Act brought by Guns Save Life, an organization dedicated to defending the Second Amendment rights of Illinois residents. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.