Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Outrage(s) of the Week

Friday, October 4, 2013

Regular readers know that we report with great frequency on a veritable parade of ridiculous cases involving over-zealous school officials and their over-the-top enforcement of "zero-tolerance" rules.  Well, here we go again. 

This week, we have not one, but four outrageous incidents of ridiculously enforced zero-tolerance policies to report.  So, depending on your perspective, either the bar you hoped would not go any lower has dropped yet another peg, or--alternatively--the "asinine enforcement index" has now reached a new high.

Our first case involves a California high school student who was confronted by Canyon High School officials and told to change her NRA T-shirt because the officials deemed the shirt a violation the school's dress code, which forbids offensive, violent or divisive clothing.

According to a CBS Los Angeles story, Sophomore Haley Bullwinkle wore her NRA shirt to school last month, and ended up in the principal's office.  "They were treating me like I was a criminal," she said, noting that school officials would not allow her to wear the shirt "because it promoted gun violence."

The NRA shirt was given to her by her father and features images of a deer, the American flag and the silhouette of a hunter.  Written on the shirt are the words "National Rifle Association of America: Protecting America's Traditions Since 1871."

According to a Los Angeles Times article, when Haley's parents wrote to the school's principal, suggesting that administrators had infringed on their daughter's constitutional rights, Principal Kimberly Fricker responded by sending the parents the school's policy on clothing that "depicts violence."

According to the policy, that includes " anything that is divisive or offensive to a staff member."  It also states: "The administration reserves the right to restrict any clothing or accessories that in our judgment detracts from the educational environment of Canyon High School."

Civil rights attorney Chuck Michel, who has been working with the Bullwinkle family on the case, said, "If they're going to try to characterize this shirt as depicting violence, then this policy is overboard.  School officials can't write themselves a policy that gives them unfettered discretion."

The Orange Unified School District apparently agrees, as they have subsequently released a statement saying that Principal Fricker has now concluded that the shirt didn't promote violence, and that Haley "will be permitted to wear the shirt."  (Please see our related story here.)

The article also noted that this was not the first time Bullwinkle has worn the shirt to school.  Michel said he's not sure why the shirt caught school administrator's attention this time, but believes it may be connected to the national debate on gun rights.

In the second case, 12-year-old Joseph Lyssikatos of Coventry, Rhode Island, was suspended from Shawn Feinstein Middle School for three days, and forced to miss testing for his advanced math class, after violating the school's "anti-weapons policy."   According to a New York Daily News article, his "weapon" was a toy key chain--slightly larger than a quarter--that was shaped like a gun.  The seventh grader had won the key chain at an arcade.  Unfortunately for him, the dangerous "weapon" fell out of his back pack and was picked up by a classmate who showed it to others.    

Joseph was also banned from a school trip at the end of the month.  The classmate who displayed the key chain after it fell out of Joseph's backpack received no disciplinary action.

As reported in the Daily Caller, our third case involves a Cobb County, Georgia high school senior who faces felony weapons charges for bringing fishing gear to school.  Not in school; to school.  More specifically, in a tackle box, in his car, in the parking lot.

Cody Chitwood, an avid fisherman and 17-year-old student at Lassiter High School, was charged with the felony of bringing weapons into a school zone after police found fishing knives in a tackle box in his car.  Police found the fishing knives while performing a random sweep of cars in the parking lot.

According to the article, if the district attorney decides to prosecute, Chitwood could face 2-10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

"It's pretty ridiculous," said Chitwood.  "I have an attorney and I'm hoping to get the felony dropped so I can still get in the Air Force."

Our final case (for now) involves an 8-year-old Florida boy who was suspended from school for using his finger as a pretend gun while playing with his friends. 

According to a Fox News article, Jordan Bennett was suspended for a day after administrators at Harmony Community School said the hand gesture was an act of violence.

The article reports that Jordan's mother is concerned that the suspension and disciplinary record may cause her son to be unfairly labeled as violent.

"He had nothing in his hand.  It was a finger gun, a pretend gun," Bonnie Bennett said. "He didn't threaten violence.  He didn't utter words that were inappropriate.  He made a sound and used his fingers and that was it."

Reportedly, school district officials said their code of conduct prohibits students from playing with "invisible" guns.   

These four cases--and there will be more--serve as the latest reminder of the pitfalls encountered when "zero-tolerance" rules are applied without exercising sound judgment or basic common sense.  As we note time after time, all of us agree that we want our children to be safe at school, and that reasonable safety measures should be followed.  But this continued unreasonable, zero-common-sense enforcement of "zero tolerance" policies not only encroaches on our freedom, but places an extreme and unfair burden on innocent children and their families.  It also undermines the authority of school personnel by making them appear arbitrary and persecutory.  It is truly outrageous, and needs to stop.

TRENDING NOW
Oregon Incident Illustrates Obvious Flaws in Red Flag Laws

News  

Monday, May 11, 2026

Oregon Incident Illustrates Obvious Flaws in Red Flag Laws

A recent case involving an Oregon man who was the subject of two “red flag” gun confiscation orders illustrates one of the many problems with the foolish policy.

A “Thought Experiment” That has Already Been Tried—And Failed

News  

Monday, May 11, 2026

A “Thought Experiment” That has Already Been Tried—And Failed

Washington Post opinion columnist Megan McArdle recently wrote an article (paywall alert) exploring a “new” idea to combat violent crime where firearms are used.

Beyond Colorado: DOJ Lawsuits Herald a National Defense of the Second Amendment

News  

Monday, May 11, 2026

Beyond Colorado: DOJ Lawsuits Herald a National Defense of the Second Amendment

Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon and her newly hired brigade of Second Amendment attorneys at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division Second Amendment Section are clearly ready to work. 

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging U.S. Supreme Court to Hear the Case of Navy Veteran Patrick “Tate” Adamiak

Monday, May 4, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging U.S. Supreme Court to Hear the Case of Navy Veteran Patrick “Tate” Adamiak

The National Rifle Association joined the Second Amendment Foundation, California Rifle & Pistol Association, Second Amendment Law Center, Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in ...

Virginia: Spanberger Signs Unconstitutional Gun Bills into Law

Thursday, April 23, 2026

Virginia: Spanberger Signs Unconstitutional Gun Bills into Law

Today, April 23rd, Governor Spanberger Signed HB1525 and SB727/HB1524 into law. 

Canada’s Multi-Million Dollar “Red Flag” Regime: All Show, No Go

News  

Monday, May 11, 2026

Canada’s Multi-Million Dollar “Red Flag” Regime: All Show, No Go

American “red flag” laws (“punishment now, due process later”) have been opposed for years by groups as varied as the NRA and the ACLU because of their shaky science, minimal evidentiary requirements, and significant erosions of constitutional ...

Connecticut Senate Rams Through Unconstitutional Pistol Ban in Dead of Night

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Connecticut Senate Rams Through Unconstitutional Pistol Ban in Dead of Night

Last night, in the early morning hours of May 6th, progressives in the Connecticut Senate passed H5043, the Governor's bill banning future manufacture, sale, and importation of many commonly owned handguns in Connecticut.

Pennsylvania: Pair of Pro-Gun Bills Advance In Senate

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Pennsylvania: Pair of Pro-Gun Bills Advance In Senate

Wednesday, May 6 was a big day in Harrisburg for gun owners as the Senate took action on a couple important gun bills.  

NRA Files Amicus Brief Arguing that Firearm Prohibitions for Nonviolent Felons Violate the Second Amendment

Thursday, May 7, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Arguing that Firearm Prohibitions for Nonviolent Felons Violate the Second Amendment

Today, the National Rifle Association, along with the Firearms Policy Coalition and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief in Atkinson v. Blanche, a challenge to the federal lifetime prohibition on firearms possession by nonviolent felons.

New Jersey: Sherrill Administration Begrudgingly Updated Permit to Carry Dashboard, Legislation is Still Needed

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

New Jersey: Sherrill Administration Begrudgingly Updated Permit to Carry Dashboard, Legislation is Still Needed

In March, gun owners and NRA members around the state contacted their lawmakers and, as a result, Attorney General Davenport reluctantly began updating the NJ Permit to Carry Dashboard which reports statistics on the approval and denial of licenses ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.