Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

North Carolina: Pro-Gun Bills in the State House and Senate

Thursday, March 21, 2013

The House Committee on Judiciary Subcommittee A heard House Bill 17 yesterday. HB 17, introduced by state Representative Justin Burr (R-67), seeks to remove the prohibition on Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP) holders carrying a concealed firearm into any establishment licensed to serve alcohol.  In addition, this legislation would make information regarding permittees -- including those who have acquired a permit to purchase a handgun -- accessible only to law enforcement.  Unfortunately, this Committee amended HB 17 to remove the Restaurant Carry provisions and then passed this bill with the CHP confidentiality provisions.  HB 17 remains a pro-gun bill that NRA strongly supports, and it could be considered on the House floor any day.

Please contact your state Representative and urge her or him to support HB 17, as well as to support any efforts to make the bill even stronger.

The Restaurant Carry provisions were not removed from HB 17 because of opposition on the issue.  This House committee action was intended, we believe, to encourage the North Carolina Senate to take action on Restaurant Carry, as the House passed similar legislation last session that the state Senate failed to address then.  The House Republican leadership remains committed to passing a Restaurant Carry bill this session, and the NRA is working closely with pro-gun legislators to ensure that happens.

Fortunately, the state Senate does have a bill that contains the Restaurant Carry provisions.  Senate Bill 342, introduced by state Senator Buck Newton (R-11), would remove the prohibition on CHP holders carrying a concealed firearm into any establishment licensed to serve alcohol.  SB 342 also seeks to clarify the issue of local governments restricting CHP holders in parks under local control.  Last year, legislation was enacted that removed the absolute ability of local governments to ban CHP holders from carrying a firearm for personal protection in local parks.  It allowed for prohibitions at "recreational facilities," which was intended to include only the following: a playground, an athletic field, a swimming pool and an athletic facility.  SB 342 clarifies this intent, in response to several local governments enacting anti-gun restrictions that far exceed the intended definition of "recreational facilities."

Please contact your state Senator and urge her or him to support SB 342, and to work to ensure this bill is acted on as soon as possible.

TRENDING NOW
Virginia: More Gun Control Bills Filed Including Semi-Auto Ban and Tax on Suppressors!

Thursday, January 8, 2026

Virginia: More Gun Control Bills Filed Including Semi-Auto Ban and Tax on Suppressors!

Anti-gun legislators in Richmond have been busy ahead of the 2026 legislative session working on ways to burden your Second Amendment rights.

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

Tuesday, December 16, 2025

North Carolina: Update on Permitless Carry

In September, the North Carolina General Assembly briefly returned from recess and re-referred Senate Bill 50, Freedom to Carry NC, to the House Rules Committee.

Ninth Circuit Panel Rules California’s Open Carry Ban is Unconstitutional

Monday, January 5, 2026

Ninth Circuit Panel Rules California’s Open Carry Ban is Unconstitutional

On Friday, Jan. 3, a divided three judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that California’s ban on open carry in counties with a population of greater than 200,000 ...

2025 Litigation Update

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

2025 Litigation Update

In 2025, the National Rifle Association defeated New Mexico’s 7-day waiting period for firearm purchases, the ATF’s “engaged in the business” rule, the ATF’s “pistol brace” rule, a lawsuit seeking to ban lead ammunition in ...

Pro-2A Journalist Awarded in New Jersey: Further Proof the Garden State is Savable?

News  

Monday, January 5, 2026

Pro-2A Journalist Awarded in New Jersey: Further Proof the Garden State is Savable?

It’s rare to see journalists write accurate articles about the Second Amendment and the right to self-defense, and even more rare to see them receive accolades from their mainstream peers for such articles.  

NRA Files Another Lawsuit Challenging the National Firearms Act

Thursday, October 9, 2025

NRA Files Another Lawsuit Challenging the National Firearms Act

Today, the National Rifle Association—along with the American Suppressor Association, Firearms Policy Coalition, and Second Amendment Foundation—announced the filing of another lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA).

More Anti-Gun “Trajectories” and “Experiments” on the Horizon in Illinois for 2026

News  

Monday, January 5, 2026

More Anti-Gun “Trajectories” and “Experiments” on the Horizon in Illinois for 2026

As a new year begins, a timeless new year resolution remains: Work hard to ensure your state does not become like Illinois. As multiple firearm-related news outlets revisit the highs and lows of 2025, it ...

California: Committee to Reconsider Concealed Carry License Extension Bill

Friday, January 9, 2026

California: Committee to Reconsider Concealed Carry License Extension Bill

On Tuesday, January 13th, the Assembly Committee on Public Safety will reconsider Assembly Bill 1092, legislation that extends the validity period of Carry Concealed Weapons (CCW) licenses, for a vote only; no public testimony will ...

Sole Remaining Municipal Gun-Industry Lawsuit Grinds to Final Defeat

News  

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Sole Remaining Municipal Gun-Industry Lawsuit Grinds to Final Defeat

In 1999, when the rest of the country was fretting over the potential Y2K disruption of worldwide computer systems, the City of Gary, Indiana launched its lawsuit against handgun manufacturers, retailers and a wholesaler, raising ...

DOJ Defends Federal Firearms Registration in NRA Challenge to the NFA

Thursday, December 18, 2025

DOJ Defends Federal Firearms Registration in NRA Challenge to the NFA

In the NRA’s case, Brown v. ATF, the Department of Justice filed its opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, along with its own cross-motion, defending the National Firearms Act of 1934’s registration requirement for suppressors, short-barreled ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.