Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Hunting

NRA Comments To CA Fish and Game Commission Regarding Extended Lead Ammo Ban

Thursday, June 25, 2009

As a result of action taken by the California legislature, a ban was imposed on the use of lead ammunition for hunting large game in areas inhabited by the California condor. This week the California Fish and Game Commission accepted public comment on a proposal to extend the ban to all hunting in condor habitat areas. Final action will occur at the Commission's August meeting. Below are the comments that the NRA submitted in strong opposition to the latest effort to extend a lead ammunition ban statewide.


June 19, 2009 

Ms. Cindy Gustafson, President
California Fish and Game Commission
1416 Ninth Street, 13th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Ms. Gustafson:

The National Rifle Association requests that this letter be included in the public comment record on the proposal before the Commission that would extend the ban on the use of lead ammunition in hunting to include all game species within the range of the California condor.  The NRA strongly opposed the present ban and equally as strong, opposes its extension. 

Proponents of the lead ammunition ban that was signed into law nearly a year ago (and which the Commission expanded upon in its regulations) attempted to make a scientific case that links the lead poisoning problem in free-ranging condors to the ingestion by condors of spent lead ammunition found in the carcasses and gut piles of animals killed by hunters.  Two years ago, the NRA submitted to the Commission a report entitled “Summary of Science for Ammunition as the Source of Lead in Condors” prepared by two scientists eminently knowledgeable about lead ammunition in the environment.  In reviewing all of the research conducted on lead poisoning in condors that was submitted as a summary report to the Commission by the California Fish and Game Department, their conclusion was that the scientific data was not conclusive and only presented hypotheses linking lead ammunition to high blood lead levels in condors.  There was no proof of that linkage and, therefore, no expectation that banning the use of lead ammunition will reduce health risks to condors. 

In spite of this report, the California legislature banned the use of lead ammunition in hunting big game in the areas inhabited by condors and the Commission followed by expanding the areas affected and extending the ban to .22 caliber ammunition.  These actions set the stage for extending the ban statewide, because science is not driving the decisions.  Politics are driving the decisions; the politics of lead ammunition bans.  The proponents of the current ban have had their sights on banning metallic bullet lead throughout the state of California.  They can achieve their goal piecemeal, and the proposal before the Commission takes their goal that much further to the borders of the state. 

Since the ban went into effect last year, no research has come to light that gives scientific support to the ban, nor has any research surfaced that gives scientific support to extending the ban to small game and upland birds.  The only reason this proposal is on the table is because of a lawsuit that was settled between the state and the lead ban proponents that requires the Commission to consider amending the hunting regulations to extend the ban to all game species within the condor’s range.  This isn’t about good science; it is about good litigation. 

The Commission states that its objective is to follow the path of sound and enlightened resource management.  NRA believes that to mean that California’s resource management decisions are supposed to be based on sound science.  But, there is no scientific justification to extend the ban to other game species any more than there was justification for the existing ban.  If this proposal is adopted, we can only assume that the real objective is to eliminate lead ammunition and that objective is being concealed behind a concern for the condor. 

It is the hunter and shooter who provide funding to the state’s Fish and Game Department through license fees, game tags, and excess taxes that fuel wildlife conservation projects for game, non-game, and threatened and endangered species.  There is no other group of people in the United States, including those behind the lead ammunition ban, who have provided such an enormous and sustaining contribution to wildlife conservation.  They deserve to have decisions made by the Commission and the Department based on scientific data that supports the actions taken, especially when those decisions add restrictions to hunting regulations that impose hardships.  In the case of the current lead ban, no such courtesy was accorded the hunter.  The ban was put into effect in response to proponents whose interests are motivated not by the health of the California condor, but by what a ban can do to the hunters and shooters by eliminating the most cost effective, balistically superior, and readily available ammunition on the market. 

No data has been presented to suggest that the health of condors has been improved since the lead ban went into effect nor is there scientific data to suggest that extending the ban will provide any greater positive results for the condor.  Such data cannot be provided because there is no proof that high blood lead levels in condors are associated with their ingestion of spent lead ammunition by hunters. 

In conclusion, we strongly urge that the Commission table this ill-conceived proposal. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Recce
Director
Conservation, Wildlife and Natural Resources

TRENDING NOW
Now With More Banning! Dianne Feinstein Introduces “Updated” Federal “Assault Weapons” Ban (S. 66)

News  

Friday, January 11, 2019

Now With More Banning! Dianne Feinstein Introduces “Updated” Federal “Assault Weapons” Ban (S. 66)

On Wednesday, longtime gun control extremist Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced the latest version of her perennial bid to rid America of its most popular types of rifles, as well as the standard capacity magazines that ...

Wisconsin: Governor Evers Starts Session with Gun Control Push

Monday, January 14, 2019

Wisconsin: Governor Evers Starts Session with Gun Control Push

With the 2019 Wisconsin Legislative Session convened, Governor Tony Evers and Attorney General Josh Kaul are already working with legislators to pass sweeping gun control.

Canada’s Gun Control Advocates Boast Handgun Ban is “Within Reach”

News  

Friday, January 11, 2019

Canada’s Gun Control Advocates Boast Handgun Ban is “Within Reach”

On August 28, 2018, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau instructed Bill Blair, his minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction, to examine the feasibility of “a full ban on handguns and assault weapons in ...

Monster Mistake, Take Two?

News  

Hunting  

Friday, January 11, 2019

Monster Mistake, Take Two?

Capitulating to radical, anti-gun extremism has become acceptable to some within the business community in recent years, especially for companies that seem to care little about our rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.  We’ve seen banks ...

Washington: Committee Hearings Scheduled on Anti-Gun Bills

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Washington: Committee Hearings Scheduled on Anti-Gun Bills

Anti-gun bills will be heard on January 21st at 10:00AM by the Washington state Senate Committee on Law & Justice and by the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary on January 22nd at 10:00AM.

Background Checks: No Impact on Criminals

News  

Friday, January 11, 2019

Background Checks: No Impact on Criminals

We have seen a generation of gun-grabbers rise and fall. The new generation of gun-grabbers are pushing for the same tired and baseless policies that won’t so much as inconvenience criminals. We understand the emotional ...

Virginia: Gov. Northam’s Anti-Gun Bills to be Heard in Committees

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Virginia: Gov. Northam’s Anti-Gun Bills to be Heard in Committees

This week, committees in both chambers of the Virginia General Assembly will be hearing an array of bills that are part of Governor Ralph Northam’s agenda to impose sweeping gun control in the Commonwealth.  The ...

Illinois: Gov. Pritzker Signs Firearm Registration & Dealer Licensing Bill

Thursday, January 17, 2019

Illinois: Gov. Pritzker Signs Firearm Registration & Dealer Licensing Bill

Today, Governor J.B. Pritzker signed Senate Bill 337 into law.  Passed by the previous legislature in 2018, SB 337 will establish a firearm registry and shut down your local gun stores with government red tape.  Senate ...

Illinois: Firearm Registration & Dealer Licensing Bill May Reach New Governor’s Desk

Friday, January 11, 2019

Illinois: Firearm Registration & Dealer Licensing Bill May Reach New Governor’s Desk

On January 10th, Illinois state Senate President John Cullerton removed a hold on a bill potentially to make the unprecedented move of attempting to send a bill passed by the previous legislature to a newly ...

Indiana: Lake County Commissioners to Vote on Firearm Discharge Ordinance

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Indiana: Lake County Commissioners to Vote on Firearm Discharge Ordinance

On January 16th at 10:00AM, the Lake County Board of Commissioners will be voting on whether to approve the proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 1314B previously passed by the County Council to restrict the discharge of firearms ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.