Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Hunting

NRA Comments To CA Fish and Game Commission Regarding Extended Lead Ammo Ban

Thursday, June 25, 2009

As a result of action taken by the California legislature, a ban was imposed on the use of lead ammunition for hunting large game in areas inhabited by the California condor. This week the California Fish and Game Commission accepted public comment on a proposal to extend the ban to all hunting in condor habitat areas. Final action will occur at the Commission's August meeting. Below are the comments that the NRA submitted in strong opposition to the latest effort to extend a lead ammunition ban statewide.


June 19, 2009 

Ms. Cindy Gustafson, President
California Fish and Game Commission
1416 Ninth Street, 13th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Ms. Gustafson:

The National Rifle Association requests that this letter be included in the public comment record on the proposal before the Commission that would extend the ban on the use of lead ammunition in hunting to include all game species within the range of the California condor.  The NRA strongly opposed the present ban and equally as strong, opposes its extension. 

Proponents of the lead ammunition ban that was signed into law nearly a year ago (and which the Commission expanded upon in its regulations) attempted to make a scientific case that links the lead poisoning problem in free-ranging condors to the ingestion by condors of spent lead ammunition found in the carcasses and gut piles of animals killed by hunters.  Two years ago, the NRA submitted to the Commission a report entitled “Summary of Science for Ammunition as the Source of Lead in Condors” prepared by two scientists eminently knowledgeable about lead ammunition in the environment.  In reviewing all of the research conducted on lead poisoning in condors that was submitted as a summary report to the Commission by the California Fish and Game Department, their conclusion was that the scientific data was not conclusive and only presented hypotheses linking lead ammunition to high blood lead levels in condors.  There was no proof of that linkage and, therefore, no expectation that banning the use of lead ammunition will reduce health risks to condors. 

In spite of this report, the California legislature banned the use of lead ammunition in hunting big game in the areas inhabited by condors and the Commission followed by expanding the areas affected and extending the ban to .22 caliber ammunition.  These actions set the stage for extending the ban statewide, because science is not driving the decisions.  Politics are driving the decisions; the politics of lead ammunition bans.  The proponents of the current ban have had their sights on banning metallic bullet lead throughout the state of California.  They can achieve their goal piecemeal, and the proposal before the Commission takes their goal that much further to the borders of the state. 

Since the ban went into effect last year, no research has come to light that gives scientific support to the ban, nor has any research surfaced that gives scientific support to extending the ban to small game and upland birds.  The only reason this proposal is on the table is because of a lawsuit that was settled between the state and the lead ban proponents that requires the Commission to consider amending the hunting regulations to extend the ban to all game species within the condor’s range.  This isn’t about good science; it is about good litigation. 

The Commission states that its objective is to follow the path of sound and enlightened resource management.  NRA believes that to mean that California’s resource management decisions are supposed to be based on sound science.  But, there is no scientific justification to extend the ban to other game species any more than there was justification for the existing ban.  If this proposal is adopted, we can only assume that the real objective is to eliminate lead ammunition and that objective is being concealed behind a concern for the condor. 

It is the hunter and shooter who provide funding to the state’s Fish and Game Department through license fees, game tags, and excess taxes that fuel wildlife conservation projects for game, non-game, and threatened and endangered species.  There is no other group of people in the United States, including those behind the lead ammunition ban, who have provided such an enormous and sustaining contribution to wildlife conservation.  They deserve to have decisions made by the Commission and the Department based on scientific data that supports the actions taken, especially when those decisions add restrictions to hunting regulations that impose hardships.  In the case of the current lead ban, no such courtesy was accorded the hunter.  The ban was put into effect in response to proponents whose interests are motivated not by the health of the California condor, but by what a ban can do to the hunters and shooters by eliminating the most cost effective, balistically superior, and readily available ammunition on the market. 

No data has been presented to suggest that the health of condors has been improved since the lead ban went into effect nor is there scientific data to suggest that extending the ban will provide any greater positive results for the condor.  Such data cannot be provided because there is no proof that high blood lead levels in condors are associated with their ingestion of spent lead ammunition by hunters. 

In conclusion, we strongly urge that the Commission table this ill-conceived proposal. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Recce
Director
Conservation, Wildlife and Natural Resources

TRENDING NOW
California: DOJ Issues “Notice of Modification” to Proposed Ammunition Background Check Regulations

Thursday, April 18, 2019

California: DOJ Issues “Notice of Modification” to Proposed Ammunition Background Check Regulations

Today, the California Department of Justice issued a “Notice of Modification” to their proposed regulations regarding the soon to be implemented ammunition background check procedures. As a result of these changes, a second 15-day public ...

Heeee’s Baaack: Bill Clinton Peddles Gun Control on a Wish and a Lie

News  

Friday, April 19, 2019

Heeee’s Baaack: Bill Clinton Peddles Gun Control on a Wish and a Lie

Proving there is no statute of limitations on political opportunism, this week former President Bill Clinton used the occasion of the twentieth anniversary of the tragic school shooting in Littleton, Colo. to pen an op-ed pushing ...

Maine: Firearm Seizure Bill Heads To Judiciary Committee

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Maine: Firearm Seizure Bill Heads To Judiciary Committee

On April 22nd, the Maine Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Legislative Document 1312, which would allow for firearms to be seized and Second Amendment rights to be suspended without due process. 

New York Times Admits Privately-Funded “Gun Violence” Research is a Thing

News  

Friday, April 19, 2019

New York Times Admits Privately-Funded “Gun Violence” Research is a Thing

The New York Times – the “paper of record” – reports that “Gun Research is Suddenly Hot.” While we’re happy to see the Times has finally acknowledged that “gun research” can survive federal restrictions on taxpayer funded gun control ...

Media Continues to Cause Distorted Fear of School Violence

News  

Friday, April 19, 2019

Media Continues to Cause Distorted Fear of School Violence

When it comes to the wellbeing of today’s youth, one would think that all could agree that provoking unnecessary fear should be avoided. That apparently is not the case, however, when it comes to pushing ...

California: Legislature Returns from Spring Break

Sunday, April 21, 2019

California: Legislature Returns from Spring Break

The California Legislature returns from spring recess this week and seven different committees are considering bills that could impact your rights. 

Indiana: Important Self-Defense Bill Passes Legislature, On to Governor

Monday, April 22, 2019

Indiana: Important Self-Defense Bill Passes Legislature, On to Governor

On April 22nd, both chambers of the Indiana General Assembly voted to concur with the amendments made to House Bill 1284 during the conference committee process.  HB 1284 has been amended to now include many ...

Pittsburgh Residents Seek Preliminary Injunction Against Ban on Standard Capacity Magazines

News  

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Pittsburgh Residents Seek Preliminary Injunction Against Ban on Standard Capacity Magazines

With support from the NRA, gun owners challenging Pittsburgh’s ban on publicly carrying loaded magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds filed a motion today seeking a preliminary injunction. If the motion is granted, ...

Texas: House Passes Evacuation Carry Bill

Thursday, April 18, 2019

Texas: House Passes Evacuation Carry Bill

On Thursday, the Texas House gave final approval to House Bill 1177 by a vote of 102-29.

NRA Statement on New York City's Desperate Attempt to Avoid Supreme Court Review

News  

Friday, April 12, 2019

NRA Statement on New York City's Desperate Attempt to Avoid Supreme Court Review

NRA reacts to New York City's attempt to avoid having the NRA-supported Supreme Court case N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Association, et al. v. City of N.Y., et al heard in DC. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.