Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Hunting

NRA Comments To CA Fish and Game Commission Regarding Extended Lead Ammo Ban

Thursday, June 25, 2009

As a result of action taken by the California legislature, a ban was imposed on the use of lead ammunition for hunting large game in areas inhabited by the California condor. This week the California Fish and Game Commission accepted public comment on a proposal to extend the ban to all hunting in condor habitat areas. Final action will occur at the Commission's August meeting. Below are the comments that the NRA submitted in strong opposition to the latest effort to extend a lead ammunition ban statewide.


June 19, 2009 

Ms. Cindy Gustafson, President
California Fish and Game Commission
1416 Ninth Street, 13th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Ms. Gustafson:

The National Rifle Association requests that this letter be included in the public comment record on the proposal before the Commission that would extend the ban on the use of lead ammunition in hunting to include all game species within the range of the California condor.  The NRA strongly opposed the present ban and equally as strong, opposes its extension. 

Proponents of the lead ammunition ban that was signed into law nearly a year ago (and which the Commission expanded upon in its regulations) attempted to make a scientific case that links the lead poisoning problem in free-ranging condors to the ingestion by condors of spent lead ammunition found in the carcasses and gut piles of animals killed by hunters.  Two years ago, the NRA submitted to the Commission a report entitled “Summary of Science for Ammunition as the Source of Lead in Condors” prepared by two scientists eminently knowledgeable about lead ammunition in the environment.  In reviewing all of the research conducted on lead poisoning in condors that was submitted as a summary report to the Commission by the California Fish and Game Department, their conclusion was that the scientific data was not conclusive and only presented hypotheses linking lead ammunition to high blood lead levels in condors.  There was no proof of that linkage and, therefore, no expectation that banning the use of lead ammunition will reduce health risks to condors. 

In spite of this report, the California legislature banned the use of lead ammunition in hunting big game in the areas inhabited by condors and the Commission followed by expanding the areas affected and extending the ban to .22 caliber ammunition.  These actions set the stage for extending the ban statewide, because science is not driving the decisions.  Politics are driving the decisions; the politics of lead ammunition bans.  The proponents of the current ban have had their sights on banning metallic bullet lead throughout the state of California.  They can achieve their goal piecemeal, and the proposal before the Commission takes their goal that much further to the borders of the state. 

Since the ban went into effect last year, no research has come to light that gives scientific support to the ban, nor has any research surfaced that gives scientific support to extending the ban to small game and upland birds.  The only reason this proposal is on the table is because of a lawsuit that was settled between the state and the lead ban proponents that requires the Commission to consider amending the hunting regulations to extend the ban to all game species within the condor’s range.  This isn’t about good science; it is about good litigation. 

The Commission states that its objective is to follow the path of sound and enlightened resource management.  NRA believes that to mean that California’s resource management decisions are supposed to be based on sound science.  But, there is no scientific justification to extend the ban to other game species any more than there was justification for the existing ban.  If this proposal is adopted, we can only assume that the real objective is to eliminate lead ammunition and that objective is being concealed behind a concern for the condor. 

It is the hunter and shooter who provide funding to the state’s Fish and Game Department through license fees, game tags, and excess taxes that fuel wildlife conservation projects for game, non-game, and threatened and endangered species.  There is no other group of people in the United States, including those behind the lead ammunition ban, who have provided such an enormous and sustaining contribution to wildlife conservation.  They deserve to have decisions made by the Commission and the Department based on scientific data that supports the actions taken, especially when those decisions add restrictions to hunting regulations that impose hardships.  In the case of the current lead ban, no such courtesy was accorded the hunter.  The ban was put into effect in response to proponents whose interests are motivated not by the health of the California condor, but by what a ban can do to the hunters and shooters by eliminating the most cost effective, balistically superior, and readily available ammunition on the market. 

No data has been presented to suggest that the health of condors has been improved since the lead ban went into effect nor is there scientific data to suggest that extending the ban will provide any greater positive results for the condor.  Such data cannot be provided because there is no proof that high blood lead levels in condors are associated with their ingestion of spent lead ammunition by hunters. 

In conclusion, we strongly urge that the Commission table this ill-conceived proposal. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Recce
Director
Conservation, Wildlife and Natural Resources

TRENDING NOW
Illinois: Committee Passes Bill to Allow Local Infringement of Second Amendment

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Illinois: Committee Passes Bill to Allow Local Infringement of Second Amendment

The Illinois state Senate could vote on legislation to allow localities to infringe upon Second Amendment rights as early as today.  Senate Bill 2314 was moved to third reading after it had passed the Senate ...

Unfriendly Skies: Delta CEO Claims Bashing NRA Members is Good Business

News  

Friday, April 13, 2018

Unfriendly Skies: Delta CEO Claims Bashing NRA Members is Good Business

In the wake of the Parkland, Florida, murders, there has been an unusual amount of anti-gun and anti-NRA commentary by private corporations with plenty of problems of their own.   In February, Delta announced it was ending a ...

Pennsylvania: Semi-Auto Ban Legislation to be Introduced

Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Pennsylvania: Semi-Auto Ban Legislation to be Introduced

This week, Senator Wayne Fontana (D-Allegheny) started circulating a co-sponsorship memorandum soliciting members of the Pennsylvania state Senate to support a proposal to ban commonly owned semi-automatic firearms and standard capacity magazines in Pennsylvania.  Please ...

UK Officials Continue to Push Knife/Gun/Cleaning Products Control

News  

Friday, April 13, 2018

UK Officials Continue to Push Knife/Gun/Cleaning Products Control

The UK’s descent into absurdity continued this week as officials announced new efforts to crack down on knives and other potentially dangerous objects. The renewed interest in banning sharp objects stems from a recent spate of killings in London. ...

Illinois: Committees to Hear Gun Control

Tuesday, April 17, 2018

Illinois: Committees to Hear Gun Control

Today, the Illinois state House Judiciary-Criminal Committee will be considering a floor amendment that was added to House Bill 1470 to ration the exercise of Second Amendment rights. In addition, the state Senate Judiciary Committee will consider bills that would ...

New Jersey: Senate Committee Approves Gun Control Bills

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

New Jersey: Senate Committee Approves Gun Control Bills

On Monday, the Senate Law & Public Safety Committee approved several gun control bills during a hearing that stretched over five hours. 

Washington: Seattle to Consider Legislation to Make Firearms Unavailable for Self-Defense

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Washington: Seattle to Consider Legislation to Make Firearms Unavailable for Self-Defense

Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan and Councilmember M. Lorena González have announced their intention to introduce legislation to impose a one-size-fits-all method of storing firearms as well as punishing victims of theft by requiring reporting of lost or ...

NRA backs Challenge to Vermont Magazine Ban

News  

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

NRA backs Challenge to Vermont Magazine Ban

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) today announced support for a lawsuit brought by Vermont citizens, sporting-goods stores, and shooting clubs to challenge the state¹s recent ban on many of the most ...

Trial Judge Mocks the Late Justice Scalia While Upholding Expansive Gun Ban

Second Amendment  

News  

Friday, April 13, 2018

Trial Judge Mocks the Late Justice Scalia While Upholding Expansive Gun Ban

Gun owners have seen many outrageous instances of courts dismissing the importance, if not the very existence, of the individual right to keep and bear arms. But Judge William G. Young of the U.S. District ...

NRA Applauds Law Protecting Privacy of Firearms Records

News  

Tuesday, April 17, 2018

NRA Applauds Law Protecting Privacy of Firearms Records

The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action applauds Nebraska Governor Pete Ricketts for signing into law legislation that protects the confidentiality of personal information associated with many firearm records.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.