Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Hunting

NRA Comments To CA Fish and Game Commission Regarding Extended Lead Ammo Ban

Thursday, June 25, 2009

As a result of action taken by the California legislature, a ban was imposed on the use of lead ammunition for hunting large game in areas inhabited by the California condor. This week the California Fish and Game Commission accepted public comment on a proposal to extend the ban to all hunting in condor habitat areas. Final action will occur at the Commission's August meeting. Below are the comments that the NRA submitted in strong opposition to the latest effort to extend a lead ammunition ban statewide.


June 19, 2009 

Ms. Cindy Gustafson, President
California Fish and Game Commission
1416 Ninth Street, 13th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Ms. Gustafson:

The National Rifle Association requests that this letter be included in the public comment record on the proposal before the Commission that would extend the ban on the use of lead ammunition in hunting to include all game species within the range of the California condor.  The NRA strongly opposed the present ban and equally as strong, opposes its extension. 

Proponents of the lead ammunition ban that was signed into law nearly a year ago (and which the Commission expanded upon in its regulations) attempted to make a scientific case that links the lead poisoning problem in free-ranging condors to the ingestion by condors of spent lead ammunition found in the carcasses and gut piles of animals killed by hunters.  Two years ago, the NRA submitted to the Commission a report entitled “Summary of Science for Ammunition as the Source of Lead in Condors” prepared by two scientists eminently knowledgeable about lead ammunition in the environment.  In reviewing all of the research conducted on lead poisoning in condors that was submitted as a summary report to the Commission by the California Fish and Game Department, their conclusion was that the scientific data was not conclusive and only presented hypotheses linking lead ammunition to high blood lead levels in condors.  There was no proof of that linkage and, therefore, no expectation that banning the use of lead ammunition will reduce health risks to condors. 

In spite of this report, the California legislature banned the use of lead ammunition in hunting big game in the areas inhabited by condors and the Commission followed by expanding the areas affected and extending the ban to .22 caliber ammunition.  These actions set the stage for extending the ban statewide, because science is not driving the decisions.  Politics are driving the decisions; the politics of lead ammunition bans.  The proponents of the current ban have had their sights on banning metallic bullet lead throughout the state of California.  They can achieve their goal piecemeal, and the proposal before the Commission takes their goal that much further to the borders of the state. 

Since the ban went into effect last year, no research has come to light that gives scientific support to the ban, nor has any research surfaced that gives scientific support to extending the ban to small game and upland birds.  The only reason this proposal is on the table is because of a lawsuit that was settled between the state and the lead ban proponents that requires the Commission to consider amending the hunting regulations to extend the ban to all game species within the condor’s range.  This isn’t about good science; it is about good litigation. 

The Commission states that its objective is to follow the path of sound and enlightened resource management.  NRA believes that to mean that California’s resource management decisions are supposed to be based on sound science.  But, there is no scientific justification to extend the ban to other game species any more than there was justification for the existing ban.  If this proposal is adopted, we can only assume that the real objective is to eliminate lead ammunition and that objective is being concealed behind a concern for the condor. 

It is the hunter and shooter who provide funding to the state’s Fish and Game Department through license fees, game tags, and excess taxes that fuel wildlife conservation projects for game, non-game, and threatened and endangered species.  There is no other group of people in the United States, including those behind the lead ammunition ban, who have provided such an enormous and sustaining contribution to wildlife conservation.  They deserve to have decisions made by the Commission and the Department based on scientific data that supports the actions taken, especially when those decisions add restrictions to hunting regulations that impose hardships.  In the case of the current lead ban, no such courtesy was accorded the hunter.  The ban was put into effect in response to proponents whose interests are motivated not by the health of the California condor, but by what a ban can do to the hunters and shooters by eliminating the most cost effective, balistically superior, and readily available ammunition on the market. 

No data has been presented to suggest that the health of condors has been improved since the lead ban went into effect nor is there scientific data to suggest that extending the ban will provide any greater positive results for the condor.  Such data cannot be provided because there is no proof that high blood lead levels in condors are associated with their ingestion of spent lead ammunition by hunters. 

In conclusion, we strongly urge that the Commission table this ill-conceived proposal. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Recce
Director
Conservation, Wildlife and Natural Resources

TRENDING NOW
Levi’s Teams with Billionaire Michael Bloomberg to Attack Gun Rights

News  

Friday, September 7, 2018

Levi’s Teams with Billionaire Michael Bloomberg to Attack Gun Rights

Levi Strauss & Co. established its brand in the mid-19th century by selling durable clothing to working-class Americans. As Levi’s signature jeans gained popularity amongst a wider set in the middle of the last century, ...

Round Two: Gun Rights Groups Prevail (Again) in Second Challenge to Firearm Restrictions in Delaware’s State Parks, Forests

News  

Gun Laws  

Friday, October 12, 2018

Round Two: Gun Rights Groups Prevail (Again) in Second Challenge to Firearm Restrictions in Delaware’s State Parks, Forests

Gun rights groups, including the NRA’s Delaware affiliate, the Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association, scored an encore legal victory this week when the Superior Court of the State of Delaware invalidated parts of newly promulgated regulations ...

Who’s BS’ing Now? Gonzalez Argues for Gun Confiscation but Insists She’s “Pro Second Amendment”

News  

Friday, October 12, 2018

Who’s BS’ing Now? Gonzalez Argues for Gun Confiscation but Insists She’s “Pro Second Amendment”

Gun control advocates are constantly looking for the right messenger to push an agenda that boils down to law-abiding Americans giving up their freedoms, their security, and their property without expectation of affecting the behavior ...

Jamie Lee Curtis “Proves” She is Not Anti-gun by Stating her Support for Banning Guns?!?!

News  

Friday, October 12, 2018

Jamie Lee Curtis “Proves” She is Not Anti-gun by Stating her Support for Banning Guns?!?!

Actors and actresses should generally stick to what they know best; repeating the lines others have written for them. Jamie Lee Curtis recently decided to try to explain, in her own words, how much she ...

South Carolina: Governor McMaster Signs Pro-Gun Bill

Monday, May 22, 2017

South Carolina: Governor McMaster Signs Pro-Gun Bill

Last Friday, May 19, Governor Henry McMaster (R) signed H. 3429 into law.  This bill went into effect upon the Governor’s approval.

Nevada: Governor Sandoval Signs AB 118!

Monday, May 22, 2017

Nevada: Governor Sandoval Signs AB 118!

Today, May 22, Governor Brian Sandoval signed important pro-gun legislation, Assembly Bill 118, into law.  AB 118, sponsored by Assemblyman Skip Daly, will allow members of the military and those who have received an honorable ...

Senator from Tennessee or Times Square? Bloomberg Hosts Manhattan Fundraiser for Phil Bredesen

News  

Thursday, October 11, 2018

Senator from Tennessee or Times Square? Bloomberg Hosts Manhattan Fundraiser for Phil Bredesen

Is Phil Bredesen running for U.S. Senate to represent Memphis or Manhattan? Rocky Top or Rockefeller Center? Appalachia or the Big Apple? Tennessee voters might wonder after billionaire gun control financier and former-New York City ...

President’s Column | Your Vote Outweighs Their Millions: Make Your Voice Heard Nov. 6

News  

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

President’s Column | Your Vote Outweighs Their Millions: Make Your Voice Heard Nov. 6

My fellow NRA members, we stand at the edge of the precipice of one of the most important elections of our lives. That is the reality we face, and we face it just days from ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.