Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

NRA-ILA Fights for Workers` and Customers` Rights

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Does a parking lot have
more rights than you do?

by Chris W. Cox

NRA-ILA Executive Director

Silly question, I know. But your NRA-ILA is fighting against huge corporate conglomerates who argue that the rights of a humble patch of asphalt outside a business trump yours.

They argue that companies can void the rights of law-abiding citizens on company property, even if the property is open to the general public. If you stop at a grocery store, for instance, they argue that the store can prohibit you from leaving a firearm locked in your vehicle while you shop. It doesn’t matter to them whether you lawfully transport a firearm for protection, recreational shooting, or hunting--even if you have a Right-to-Carry permit.

It’s not just guns. Lobbyists for big business in Florida claim that they can ban books, Bibles, or even a copy of the U.S. Constitution, from your vehicle as well. Their argument is simple: Any business can declare the constitutional rights of a person to be null and void, if that person is on company property.

The issue first came to a head at a Weyerhaeuser paper mill in Valliant, Okla. One business lobbyist ruefully recounted the Oklahoma incident to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, saying that “Dogs were brought in to do a drug shakedown--the dogs had been crosstrained for ATF use, so they would hit on explosives and gunpowder or guns … I think there were seven employees who had guns in their trucks or cars. They were terminated … they went a little too far in the Oklahoma case.”

If the warrantless search of private vehicles by police dogs is a “little too far,” I’d hate to see these companies really put some effort into violating our rights. Companies justify these police-state tactics under the rallying cry of “property rights.” But property doesn’t have rights. People do.

Property owners do have rights, to be sure. So do employers. Property owners can prohibit trespassers, and companies can establish rules for conduct in their workplaces. The Georgia Chamber of Commerce quoted one newspaper as saying, “an employer has the right to ban extreme body piercings and tattoos, or to insist on jackets and ties. An employer can prohibit workers from showing up at work with Girl Scout cookie order forms or raffle tickets.” This feeble comparison overlooks the obvious: There is no constitutional right to dress as you please, or to sell cookies at work.

When companies invite their emp-loyees and customers to park on their property, however, the property rights of those businesses do not magically balloon and blot out the constitutional rights of their employees and customers. Property rights are a matter of law. The right to self-defense is not only guaranteed by the Second Amendment, but is a “natural right” that predates the Constitution.

But Big Business even disputes that simple truth. Consider the following quote, and guess where it came from: “Supporters of the bill who favor placing gun rights above the rights of property owners rely on a questionable understanding of Second Amendment rights for legitimacy. Often the NRA and its supporters will argue that gun ownership is an inalienable right provided for by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That is not consistent with the text of the amendment nor with the courts that have interpreted it.”

No, this statement was not written by a lawyer from a gun ban group. It was circulated to Georgia legislators by the constitutional scholars at the Georgia Traditional Manufacturers Association. That’s right--business lobbyists are arguing that you simply have no Second Amendment rights at all.

So it should be no surprise to learn that the business lobbyists have teamed up with the gun ban groups to defeat common-sense bills that would protect your right to self-defense. To defeat a bill in the Florida legislature, the Florida Retail Federation hired a lobbyist who had previously been the Southeast Regional Director for the Brady Campaign and the Million Mom March. You know what they say about birds of a feather.

That’s right--business lobbyists are arguing that you simply have no Second Amendment rights at all.

Opening a business subjects the owner to countless regulations. Businesses are not allowed to discriminate against employees and customers on the grounds of race, color, religion, or disability. But these gun ban policies are blatant discrimination against people who choose to exercise a constitutional right and take responsibility for their own safety. These policies cut to the core of your natural, guaranteed right to self-defense, and they render Right-to-Carry permits meaningless.

The arrogance of the business lobbyists runs thick. “Parking on a company’s property is a privilege, not a ‘right’,” sniffed one business group. I’d like them to tell that to a customer who’s elderly or mobility-impaired.

These ridiculous arguments are even crazier when you consider the fact that every one of the reform bills has included liability protection for business owners, which they don’t have under current law. So even though the bills actually help businesses, the big corporate lobbyists, in their greed for power, opposed them.

The corporate giants have insulted state legislators for even considering reform bills. Mark Wilson of the Florida Chamber of Commerce told the Miami Herald he questioned how “you can be smart enough to be in the legislature and still consider this bill seriously.” And the Georgia Chamber of Commerce took top prize for hysterical alarmism, claiming that a reform bill “fails to protect businesses and job creators and their employees who may be the subject of terrorist attacks.”

I wonder just how many people would agree that forced disarmament is the best protection from terrorist attacks. But the real impact of these policies is not nearly so hypothetical. Workers have lost their jobs to corporate gun ban policies. Other honest people have been victimized by violent criminals on anti-gun corporations’ property. Our files of these incidents are growing every day. Will your job--or your safety--be next?

TRENDING NOW
Court's Commonsense Conclusion: "There Was a Gun" Isn't Enough to Justify Issuing a Restraining Order

Second Amendment  

Friday, May 19, 2017

Court's Commonsense Conclusion: "There Was a Gun" Isn't Enough to Justify Issuing a Restraining Order

The Supreme Court of North Dakota confirmed this week that simply possessing a handgun while on one’s own private property cannot support a finding of "disorderly conduct" under the state’s disorderly conduct restraining order law. ...

Rep. Rob Bishop Introduces the "Lawful Purpose and Self Defense Act"

News  

Friday, May 26, 2017

Rep. Rob Bishop Introduces the "Lawful Purpose and Self Defense Act"

On Wednesday, May 24, 2017, Chairman of the House Committee on Natural Resources Rob Bishop (R-UT) introduced H.R. 2620, the "Lawful Purpose and Self Defense Act." This bill would remove ATF's authority to use the ...

Concealed Carrying Hits New High, Underscores Need for National Law

News  

Friday, May 26, 2017

Concealed Carrying Hits New High, Underscores Need for National Law

Information collected by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) indicates an unprecedented surge in the number of concealed carry permits, with the largest one-year increase on record occurring between May 2016 and May 2017.

Legislation Reintroduced to Permanently Dismantle Obama-Era Enforcement Abuse

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, May 26, 2017

Legislation Reintroduced to Permanently Dismantle Obama-Era Enforcement Abuse

This week, Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) reintroduced the Financial Institution Customer Protection Act, a bill aimed at permanently dismantling Operation Choke Point (OCP).  

Illinois: House Committee Passes Bill to Close Local Gun Dealers

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Illinois: House Committee Passes Bill to Close Local Gun Dealers

The House Judiciary Committee passed Senate Bill 1657 by a 7-6 vote.

Abbott Signs Senate Bill 16, Bringing Texas License To Carry Fees Down to Among Lowest in Nation

News  

Thursday, May 25, 2017

Abbott Signs Senate Bill 16, Bringing Texas License To Carry Fees Down to Among Lowest in Nation

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) today applauded Texas Gov. Greg Abbott for signing into law NRA-backed legislation that will make license to carry fees in Texas among the lowest in the ...

Nevada: Governor Sandoval Signs AB 118!

Monday, May 22, 2017

Nevada: Governor Sandoval Signs AB 118!

Today, May 22, Governor Brian Sandoval signed important pro-gun legislation, Assembly Bill 118, into law.  AB 118, sponsored by Assemblyman Skip Daly, will allow members of the military and those who have received an honorable ...

New Zealand Police Mislead Current and Prospective Gun Owners

News  

Thursday, May 25, 2017

New Zealand Police Mislead Current and Prospective Gun Owners

Back in April, NRA-ILA alerted readers to the results of the New Zealand Parliament Law and Order Committee’s “Inquiry into issues relating to the illegal possession of firearms in New Zealand,” which proposed that a ...

Public Health Researchers Use Common Gun Control Tactic to Mislead on “Children” and Guns

News  

Friday, May 26, 2017

Public Health Researchers Use Common Gun Control Tactic to Mislead on “Children” and Guns

It is one of the most well-worn tactics of those who advocate for gun control. Step one, acquire statistics on firearms injuries among children ages 0-14. Step two, combine these relatively low numbers with the ...

Illinois: Anti-Gun Legislators Attempting to Get “Assault Weapon” Language into law

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Illinois: Anti-Gun Legislators Attempting to Get “Assault Weapon” Language into law

This week, Senator Antonio Munoz filed Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Bill 556.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.