Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

One Big Victory, Now Another Big Battle

Thursday, May 15, 2003

While we savor the U.S. House`s overwhelming vote on H.R. 1036,
our work goes forward. We now must pass
S. 659/S. 1805 and end the
politically motivated lawsuits that threaten not only the
American firearm industry, but also our
Second Amendment rights and traditional rule of law.
BY CHRIS W. COX

NRA-ILA Executive Director

By a solid margin of better than 2-to-1, the U.S. House of Representatives voted April 9 to send the gun-ban lobby`s lawsuit campaign to bankrupt the American firearm industry to the junkpile of history.

The bipartisan 285-to-140 vote that passed H.R. 1036, the "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act," represents both a victory for common sense--31 state legislatures have passed similar legislation--and a stinging defeat for those who attempt to subvert our nation`s judicial system to advance an unpopular political agenda.


"You don`t need a
legislative majority to file a lawsuit."

--Elisa Barnes, trial lawyer


"The
legal fees alone are enough to bankrupt the industry."

--John Coale, trial lawyer

That agenda is clear. The complaints filed in the more than 30 industry targeted suits have demanded court-ordered rules such as: one-gun-a-month purchase restrictions; bans on guns whose designs are "unreasonably attractive to criminals"; warranty revocations on handguns not resold through a dealer; and requiring manufacturers and distributors "to participate in a court ordered study of lawful demand for firearms and to cease sales in excess of lawful demand." What`s lawful demand in your household?

Our fight now moves to the U.S. Senate, where companion legislation, S. 659/S. 1805, by Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) and Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), has attracted not only 52 co-sponsors but also vituperation from anti-gun extremists.

Despite attempts by the media elite to deliberately mischaracterize it, S. 659/S. 1805 is a straightforward effort to restore the rule of law. The bill provides that lawsuits may not be brought against manufacturers and sellers of firearms or ammunition if the suits are based on the criminal or unlawful use of the product by a third party. Suits based on violations of federal or state law are not forbidden, nor are suits based on breach of contract or on product liability claims involving injuries caused by an improperly functioning firearm.

S. 659/S. 1805 also expressly allows suits for negligent entrustment, defined as "the supplying of a qualified product by a seller for use by another person when the seller knows or should know the person to whom the product has been supplied is likely to use the product, and in fact does use the product, in a manner involving unreasonable risk of physical injury to himself and others."

Prior to passage of H.R. 1036, the House Judiciary Committee`s Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law, chaired by Rep. Chris Cannon (R-UT), heard testimony about these junk lawsuits.

Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, told committee members that "the suits demonstrate how a pressure group can employ litigation to attempt an end run around democracy, in search of victories in court that it has been unable to obtain at the ballot box.

"Organizers of this campaign intend to use litigation as leverage to obtain sweeping nationwide changes in the manufacture and distribution of guns, including the de facto banning of some models, compulsory changes in gun design, and major new paperwork burdens and privacy sacrifices for gun owners and dealers."

Olson said anti-gun litigators were seeking out activist judges willing "to invent new law out of whole cloth," and that they realize that "even if defendants can fend off 98 percent of the cases, somebody somewhere is likely to break through, to the ruin of a given defendant or the entire industry."

Following Olson, Lawrence G. Keane, representing the National Shooting Sports Foundation, called upon Congress "to stop reckless lawsuits that seek to destroy and bankrupt a responsible American industry by blaming firearm manufacturers for the actions of criminals.

"The plaintiffs in these cases," he said, "do not allege that members of the firearms industry have broken any of our nation`s over 20,000 firearm laws. Instead, they allege that the sale of a legal product in accordance with an extensive regulatory system somehow causes crime and that the industry is subverting the law to funnel firearms to the so-called criminal market. These allegations are both highly offensive and patently false."

Keane gave Congress a "conservative estimate" of industry legal costs to date to defend itself--in excess of $100 million. "This has resulted," he said, "in large, across-the-board price increases for consumers."

Representing Colt`s Manufacturing Company, Carlton S. Chen told the committee: "These lawsuits are dangerous not only to us but also to manufacturers of lawful products in other industries. Where will it end? Should General Motors be liable for an aggressive driver who crashes into another car? If the theory of these cases is widely applied, it could result in the bankruptcies of countless companies and the displacement of American workers."



Statement of Bush Administration Policy

"The Administration strongly supports House passage of H.R. 1036. The manufacturer or seller of a legal, non-defective product should not be held liable for the criminal or unlawful misuse of that product by others. H.R. 1036 would help prevent abuse of the legal system and help curb the growing problem of frivolous lawsuits in the United States. At the same time, the legislation would carefully preserve the right of individuals to have their day in court with civil liability actions. These civil actions are enumerated in the bill and respect the traditional role of the states in our Federal system with regard to such actions."


Contact Your U.S. Senators

NRA members are strongly urged to contact their U.S. Senators and request they support S. 659/S. 1805. The Senate switchboard number is 202-224-3121. Additional contact information is available using the "Write Your Representatives" tool at www.nraila.org.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Reckless Lawsuits
TRENDING NOW
National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them

On January 3rd, Congressman Richard Hudson (R-N.C.8th) introduced H.R. 38, the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017, which simply allows lawful firearm carriers from any state to carry a concealed firearm in any other state. The bill ...

Your Members of Congress Need to Hear from You on the Hearing Protection Act of 2017

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

Your Members of Congress Need to Hear from You on the Hearing Protection Act of 2017

On Monday, Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) – joined by co-sponsors Sens. Jerry Moran (R-KS) and Rand Paul (R-KY) – introduced S. 59, the Hearing Protection Act of 2017 (HPA). Similar legislation was introduced in the ...

Supreme Court Asked to Review California’s Restrictive Carry Regime

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

Supreme Court Asked to Review California’s Restrictive Carry Regime

On Thursday, the NRA-supported case Peruta v. California took an important step towards restoring the right to bear arms in California.  The plaintiffs in the case, California gun owners and the California Rifle and Pistol ...

Alert: WA State Proposes Draconian Gun Ban Bills

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

Alert: WA State Proposes Draconian Gun Ban Bills

Inspired, perhaps, by Oscar Wilde (“Moderation is a fatal thing. Nothing succeeds like excess”), Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson has announced two new sweeping gun control bills, with Sen. David Frockt (D-Seattle) and Rep. ...

The NRA Bids Farewell to Roy Innis, Civil Rights Champion: June 6, 1934 – Jan. 8, 2017

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

The NRA Bids Farewell to Roy Innis, Civil Rights Champion: June 6, 1934 – Jan. 8, 2017

America lost a civil rights icon and a true free thinker with the death of Roy Innis on Jan. 8. For the NRA, his departure was personal. Mr. Innis served on the NRA’s Board of ...

Jeff Sessions’ Devotion to the Constitution Shines Through in Contentious Confirmation Hearing

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

Jeff Sessions’ Devotion to the Constitution Shines Through in Contentious Confirmation Hearing

On January 10 and 11, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee held the confirmation hearing for President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for United States Attorney General, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.). Throughout his distinguished career in public service, ...

Increase in Violent Crime: National Trend Driven by Local Politics?

News  

Friday, January 13, 2017

Increase in Violent Crime: National Trend Driven by Local Politics?

The FBI released its Preliminary Semiannual Uniform Crime Report earlier this week and the bad news is that violent crime increased for the second consecutive year.

NRA Applauds the Introduction of the Hearing Protection Act, H.R. 367

News  

Hunting  

Monday, January 9, 2017

NRA Applauds the Introduction of the Hearing Protection Act, H.R. 367

FAIRFAX, Va. – The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) applauded Congressmen Jeff Duncan (SC) and John Carter (TX-31) on Monday for introducing the Hearing Protection Act, an important bill that gives gun owners and sportsmen ...

Gun Shy Professor Claims Need to Counter Campus Carry

News  

Friday, January 6, 2017

Gun Shy Professor Claims Need to Counter Campus Carry

Do you look back on your college years and remember the impassioned debates, when disagreements over the Periodic Table of Elements, theories of supply and demand, or the status of Pluto as a planet could ...

California: Pre-Litigation Demand Letter sent to DOJ opposing “Bullet Button Assault Weapon” Regulations

Monday, January 9, 2017

California: Pre-Litigation Demand Letter sent to DOJ opposing “Bullet Button Assault Weapon” Regulations

Today, NRA and CRPA’s legal team submitted a joint-letter to DOJ demanding that DOJ withdraw their regulations as a violation of the authority granted under the law.  NRA and CRPA’s legal team also submitted a ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.