Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Clueless Anti-gun Democrats Dig Themselves an Ever Deeper Hole

Monday, May 19, 2025

Clueless Anti-gun Democrats Dig Themselves an Ever Deeper Hole

Anyone reading the firearm-related news these days is reminded that anti-gun Democrats appear oblivious to the blunt message sent by millions of American voters last fall. Despite Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris blowing through a mountain of money in campaigning her way to a stunning defeat, Democrats continue to push the same tired gun control agenda that got roundly shown the door in November. Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), for instance, has lately introduced the so-called “Assault Weapons Ban of 2025,” while an Illinois Democrat has proposed a bill to ban semiautomatic “convertible pistols.”

The American public, meanwhile, still isn’t buying it.

Dr. John Lott, Jr., the president of the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC), recently described the results of a poll that the CPRC commissioned last December on crime and gun control. The poll asked general election voters in America which of three approaches, in their opinion, was most likely to reduce crime: enacting more gun control; stricter enforcement of existing gun control laws; or having law enforcement arrest violent, repeat offenders and ending cashless bail reforms.

Less than one in five respondents felt the answer was more gun control. “Despite all the claims about support for gun control, only 19% of voters think passing more gun control will reduce crime, slightly more (21%) think stricter enforcement of existing gun control” is the solution. In contrast, more than half of respondents (54%) believed that the most effective approach was to crack down on criminal perpetrators by keeping violent offenders off the streets through arrest and detention.           

As Dr. Lott points out, unlike other polls and surveys this poll offered a response choice other than gun control and so is more likely to accurately reflect the public’s feelings. He cites a Rasmussen survey done with a similar set of voters at about the same time as the CPRC poll, but which framed the question in a more constricted way (“Which would do more to reduce gun violence in America, passing new gun control laws or stricter enforcement of existing gun control laws?”). There, also, “new gun control laws” was a less popular choice than greater enforcement of existing laws (31% vs. 56%), but without any third choice, “both percentages are much higher than when respondents have the option of arresting criminals and keeping them in jail.” (Unsurprisingly, the “new gun control laws” option in that survey was most popular among Democrats, supported by 49%; in contrast, only 18% of Republicans felt it was the better approach.)     

A research brief published this month by the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, More Policing, Less Murder, appears to bear out the wisdom of ramped-up law enforcement. The brief, which analyzes homicide trends during the 2020-2022 de-policing era and the subsequent “re-policing” years, found that increased policing (arrests and stops) was linked to lower homicide rates: the “sharper the increase in police activity the greater the fall in homicides across the 15 cities.” The only city in the group that failed to show a drop in homicides was also the single jurisdiction that had no increase in police enforcement. In Democrat-run Seattle, “police make 60% fewer stops than they did in 2019 while the murder rate is 50% higher. The city’s experience provides a useful, if tragic, counterfactual that proves the impact of re-policing on murders.”

All indications are that the new Trump administration is better attuned to the public zeitgeist.

For starters, it seems to have rejected the performative, kneejerk “more gun control” response that was a hallmark of the Biden presidency. When asked about a tragic shooting at Florida State University last month and whether there was anything he saw wrong with gun laws in the wake of the shooting, President Trump called such events “terrible,” and told reporters, “But the gun doesn’t do the shooting, the people do.”

Following President Trump’s February 7th Executive Order entitled “Protecting Second Amendment Rights,” the U.S. Department of Justice announced the creation of a Second Amendment Task Force to overturn the anti-gun initiatives of the prior administration, which “placed an undue burden on gun owners and vendors by targeting law-abiding citizens exercising their 2nd Amendment rights.” We’ve seen the official end of Biden’s “zero tolerance” policy for inspections of federal firearm licensees, which, as we noted, had ushered in a “bureaucratic reign of terror that was costing small business people their livelihoods over harmless clerical errors.”

The Trump White House has also ordered the removal of former Surgeon General Vivek Murthy’s anti-gun tract, Firearm Violence: A Public Health Crisis in America, from the official Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) website, and reframed the issue as what it actually is, one of criminal law and law enforcement rather than epidemics and disease control. In the words of NRA-ILA’s John Commerford, “With a pro-gun House, a pro-gun Senate, and a pro-gun president in the White House, now is the time to put the foot on the gas and try to restore Second Amendment rights of America’s gun owners.”

Meanwhile, Democrats oppose these measures and continue to demand new gun control laws for responsible gun owners, all while rushing to defend murderers, gang members, drug traffickers, and other violent criminals (e.g., here, here, here and here). “We’re seeing Democrat senators, Democrat house members flying down to El Salvador and putting all their political capital behind the position that we need more illegal immigrants in America, we need more criminals in America, and we need more MS-13 gang members in America… It is a very bizarre political decision that the Democrats have made,” notes Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.). 

None of this is terribly complicated. Voters, even in ultra-blue California, rejected progressive, soft-on-crime policies and demanded that politicians get serious about crime and public safety. By continuing to throw their support behind gangsters, murderers and other criminals, observes one commentator, the Democrats are simply “digging a deeper and deeper political grave for themselves. And Mr. Trump is selling them the shovel.”

TRENDING NOW
New Jersey: Attorney General Sends Subpoenas to Statewide FFLs Seeking Customer Records

Saturday, May 16, 2026

New Jersey: Attorney General Sends Subpoenas to Statewide FFLs Seeking Customer Records

Last year, the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office filed a lawsuit against Glock, Inc. under the state’s public nuisance law. This week, in connection with that lawsuit, FFLs across the state started receiving subpoenas demanding ...

Virginia: Spanberger Signs Unconstitutional Gun Bills into Law

Thursday, April 23, 2026

Virginia: Spanberger Signs Unconstitutional Gun Bills into Law

Today, April 23rd, Governor Spanberger Signed HB1525 and SB727/HB1524 into law. 

UPDATE: Legislation Introduced to Protect Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights

News  

Monday, May 5, 2025

UPDATE: Legislation Introduced to Protect Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights

The Chairmen of the House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs, U.S. Representative Mike Bost (R-IL-12) and Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS), as well as Senator John Kennedy (R-LA), have reintroduced the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act ...

NRA Announces State Lawsuit Challenging Virginia’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans

Thursday, May 14, 2026

NRA Announces State Lawsuit Challenging Virginia’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans

Today, the National Rifle Association announced the filing of a state lawsuit challenging Virginia’s newly enacted bans on “assault firearms” and magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds.

Virginia: Spanberger Doubles Down on Semi-Auto Ban, NRA Doubles Down on Lawsuits

Thursday, May 14, 2026

Virginia: Spanberger Doubles Down on Semi-Auto Ban, NRA Doubles Down on Lawsuits

On the night of May 14th, Governor Spanberger once again proved she has no concern for the 2nd Amendment by signing SB749/HB217 - legislation that bans certain semi-automatic firearms, including many semi-automatic rifles, pistols and ...

Tell Your Member of Congress to Protect Veterans Second Amendment Rights!

News  

Friday, May 15, 2026

Tell Your Member of Congress to Protect Veterans Second Amendment Rights!

The U.S. House of Representatives is expected to vote as early as next week on the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act.

Beyond Colorado: DOJ Lawsuits Herald a National Defense of the Second Amendment

News  

Monday, May 11, 2026

Beyond Colorado: DOJ Lawsuits Herald a National Defense of the Second Amendment

Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon and her newly hired brigade of Second Amendment attorneys at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division Second Amendment Section are clearly ready to work. 

NRA Files Federal Lawsuit Challenging Virginia’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans

Thursday, May 14, 2026

NRA Files Federal Lawsuit Challenging Virginia’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans

Today, the National Rifle Association, Firearms Policy Coalition, Second Amendment Foundation, and two NRA members filed a lawsuit challenging Virginia’s newly enacted bans on “assault firearms” and magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds.

New York Times Acknowledges Semi-Auto Rifles Aren’t Just Common, But “Ubiquitous”

News  

Monday, May 18, 2026

New York Times Acknowledges Semi-Auto Rifles Aren’t Just Common, But “Ubiquitous”

In the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), that acknowledged the Second Amendment protects the individual right to keep and bear arms, Justice Antonin Scalia noted some of the arms ...

Oregon Incident Illustrates Obvious Flaws in Red Flag Laws

News  

Monday, May 11, 2026

Oregon Incident Illustrates Obvious Flaws in Red Flag Laws

A recent case involving an Oregon man who was the subject of two “red flag” gun confiscation orders illustrates one of the many problems with the foolish policy.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.