Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Operation Choke Point 2.0? Financial Services Discrimination Back in the News

Monday, December 9, 2024

Operation Choke Point 2.0? Financial Services Discrimination Back in the News

The plague of businesses and even individuals being exiled from the modern economy by politically motivated regulators is back in the news, thanks largely to a recent segment on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast in which a guest highlighted the ongoing scandal. Marc Andreessen, a pioneer in the web browsing industry and a current venture capitalist, shocked the hugely popular and influential podcaster by detailing how political opponents of the Biden administration were being systematically deprived of financial services. The revelations took on new significance amidst Biden’s wholesale weaponization of government for partisan ends, which has included censorship, intimidation, character assassination, and selective prosecutions, among other things. For Second Amendment advocates, it was a reminder of Biden’s long association with official corruption aimed at businesses involved with firearms and ammunition.

One of the more notorious episodes from the Obama-Biden administration was Operation Choke Point, a scheme to use pressure from federal regulators to coerce banks and payment processors from doing business with legal but politically disfavored industries. The idea was to choke off the supply of financial services the businesses needed to survive in the modern economy, while bypassing the legal scrutiny of the legislative process and official enforcement proceedings. The firearm industry was a prime target of Operation Choke Point, and many lawfully operated, otherwise financially stable businesses in that sector fell victim to its abusive, discriminatory practices.

The Obama-Biden administration first denied and then tried to whitewash the ongoing conspiracy as merely a misunderstood form of “risk management” guidance. Of course, plausible deniability was the whole point. It wasn’t the government itself directly acting on the operation’s targets, but government regulated financial service providers responding to subtle but clearly understood threats about the potential consequences of doing business with the wrong clients. These included costly and embarrassing oversight actions designed to portray the banks as lax on safeguarding their depositors against nefarious activity.

The tactic was apparently so successful in suppressing the targeted commerce that its proponents became increasingly emboldened and overt. Eventually, banking executives were hauled before congressional committees to explain themselves for servicing perfectly legal and creditworthy businesses engaged in politically disfavored activity. These included bank customers that were involved in the business of making and selling semiautomatic firearms that anti-gunners in Congress had unsuccessfully sought to ban as “assault weapons.” 

Things became so far gone that the tactics were eventually directed at the NRA itself but by New York State financial regulators who were so blatant and ham-fisted that NRA had enough evidence to challenge their actions in court. The suit charged the New York officials with violating the NRA’s first Amendment right to advocate for the constitutional liberties of its members.

The defendants unsuccessfully sought to have the suit dismissed by the trial court and then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which reversed the trial court and dismissed the case.  The NRA then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, where none other than the ACLU joined the suit on the NRA’s side. The high court would go on to unanimously rule in the NRA’s favor, in an opinion written by Sonia Sotomayor, considered perhaps the staunchest leftist among the nine justices (and certainly no fan of the Second Amendment). Sotomayor characterized the First Amendment principles in the case as well-established. “Today, the Court reaffirms [that] Government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors,” the opinion stated. 

Despite that rare and stark bipartisan rebuke against the tactics at the heart of Operation Choke Point and its sinister offspring, Andreessen claimed the Biden administration has continued and expanded these schemes. He gave several recent examples to Rogan of businesses and people who had been “de-banked,” so Andreessen asserted, “for having the wrong politics, for saying unacceptable things.” 

Andreessen also explained that regulators used the concept of a “politically exposed person” to force banks to discontinue business not just with commercial entities but even with individuals who were at odds with the administration’s own politics. As he said to Rogan, the government gets around its own constitutional constraints on punishing private persons and companies for their views by using private banks as the cutouts and hatchet men.

In this way, Andreessen said, “the government gets to say, ‘we didn’t do it; it was the private company that did it.” Banks that cooperate, Andreessen continued, additionally receive government protection from potential competitors offering innovated new financial products. He tied the recent developments back to the original Operation Choke Point, which he said targeted “guns,” among other industries disfavored by Obama and Biden. Andreessen described the regime as of one of “no due process … no rules … no court … no appeal … .” 

During his first term, President Trump officially ended the original Operation Choke Point. But the scheme’s lessons had been learned, both by corrupt government officials and by private financial service providers who either shared their politics or who were afraid of the consequences to their own livelihoods and enterprises of crossing them. Once Trump was out of office, Joe Biden again had the infrastructure at his disposal to resurrect and intensify Choke Point’s tactics. According to Mark Andreessen, that is exactly what the Biden-Harris administration did.

Fortunately, President Trump is again poised to ascend to the White House. And he has made the elimination of government waste, fraud, and abuse a top priority of his administration, including through the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The two principals of DOGE – Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy – are themselves well-known to Joe Rogan, who seemed suitably aghast at Andreessen’s account of what the venture capitalist called Operation Choke Point 2.0. Trump himself is also aware of and opposed to the phenomenon, telling an audience at a the Bitcoin2024 conference that “as president, I will immediately shutdown Choke Point 2.0.”

Hopefully the renewed focus on this devious scheme will bring about lasting reforms and even, perhaps, accountability for those involved. 

TRENDING NOW
Virginia Gun Shops Brace for the New Jerseyfication of the Commonwealth

News  

Monday, September 28, 2026

Virginia Gun Shops Brace for the New Jerseyfication of the Commonwealth

Jay Jones, the anti-gun but pro-bullets to the head Virginia attorney general, announced on September 15 the creation of the Firearms Accountability & Industry Responsibility (FAIR) Unit within the Civil and Criminal Justice & Public ...

DOJ Calls Time on Minnesota’s Second Amendment Waiting Game

News  

Monday, September 28, 2026

DOJ Calls Time on Minnesota’s Second Amendment Waiting Game

For too long, Minnesota Governor Tim Waltz and his anti-gun allies in the state have treated the exercise of a constitutional right as something subject to government permission and whatever wait is required for the ...

U.S. Department of Justice Declares Age 18-20 Handgun Sales Ban Unconstitutional

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

U.S. Department of Justice Declares Age 18-20 Handgun Sales Ban Unconstitutional

On September 17, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued a memorandum opinion to answer the question “whether restricting young adults from buying firearms comports with the Second Amendment as the Supreme ...

Support of Self-Defense for Law-Abiding Citizens Continues to Spread Globally

News  

Monday, September 28, 2026

Support of Self-Defense for Law-Abiding Citizens Continues to Spread Globally

In spite of some countries deciding they cannot trust their own citizens with firearms, other countries seem to be rejecting this policy…at least a bit.  

“Law abiding citizens with an AR-15 are not a threat to anyone” — Law Enforcement Groups Weigh in on Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

“Law abiding citizens with an AR-15 are not a threat to anyone” — Law Enforcement Groups Weigh in on Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

The Trace, the “newsroom” funded by anti-gun extremist Michael Bloomberg, reported in June on the extent to which the NRA-backed NYSRPA v. Bruen case has, to date, rebuilt the modern Second Amendment landscape.

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Review Lawsuit Blaming Firearm Ads for Criminal Acts

Friday, September 25, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Review Lawsuit Blaming Firearm Ads for Criminal Acts

Today, the National Rifle Association and Second Amendment Foundation filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review in Daniel Defense, LLC v. Lowy. The case asks whether firearm manufacturers can be sued ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Maine’s 72-Hour Waiting Period Law

Thursday, September 24, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Maine’s 72-Hour Waiting Period Law

The National Rifle Association and Second Amendment Foundation filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review in Beckwith v. Frey, a challenge to Maine’s 72-hour waiting period requirement for firearm purchases.

Trump DOJ Sues San Jose, Ca., Over $1,600 Concealed Carry Licensing Fee

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Trump DOJ Sues San Jose, Ca., Over $1,600 Concealed Carry Licensing Fee

Do you know the way to San Jose? Dionne Warwick famously asked in her 1968 hit song. Well, Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon certainly does, and she recently made sure the city was served ...

California: Newsom Takes One Last Shot at the Second Amendment as Governor

Monday, September 28, 2026

California: Newsom Takes One Last Shot at the Second Amendment as Governor

On Saturday, Governor Gavin Newsom inked his signature to six anti-gun bills, continuing his attack on law-abiding gun owners as he closes his final months as the Governor of California. Since taking office in 2019, ...

Everytown Goes Hunting for Credibility

News  

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Everytown Goes Hunting for Credibility

The irony is nothing short of comedy. Multiple outlets are having a field day with the Michael Bloomberg-backed Everytown organization, which has spent years and millions of dollars supporting extreme restrictions on lawful gun ownership, ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.