Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Gun Control Politicians: It’s Not Me, It’s You

Monday, October 24, 2022

Gun Control Politicians: It’s Not Me, It’s You

There’s a big gap between what the progressive elite preaches as their “transformative vision of public safety” for you and me, and what many of them see as appropriate for their special selves.

We’ve noted before that Chicago’s anti-gun Mayor Lori Lightfoot is protected by Unit 544, a special police security detail of approximately 71 officers, in addition to the mayor’s existing “separate personal bodyguard detail” of 20 officers. According to the mayor, the personal police force is necessary because, at the time the unit was created in 2020, there was “a significant amount of protests all over the city, and some of them targeted my house.”

Ex-mayor of New York City and failed presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg, who bankrolls the gun control group Everytown and “supports every single active effort to restrict gun ownership that exists,” was guarded by NYPD police officers as mayor and is now protected by private security. “I have a security detail, I pay for it all myself, and . . . they’re all retired police officers who are very well trained in firearms.”

Gun control activists who don’t have a police department at their disposal can do as billionaire Bloomberg does and hire their own professional bodyguards. 

Stacey Abrams, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee for Georgia, has recently come under fire for having spent over $1.2 million on private security since December. She has pledged to undo several pro-gun laws passed in the state, including the constitutional carry law, while pushing for new restrictions on responsible gun owners. In addition to her commitment to gun control, Ms. Abrams is reported to sit on the board of a “far-left foundation that has repeatedly called for the defunding of police,” although she has lately said she does not support such defunding.

Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.), who as a candidate was endorsed by Everytown as a “strong gun safety champion,” has embraced, also, the progressive agenda’s cornerstone of defunding the police.

Even as the “phrase ‘defund the police’ has become politically radioactive” for Democrats, Ms. Bush remains adamant. In an interview this month with CNN, on being asked, “would you still double down or use that slogan, ‘defund the police?’” she responded, “Absolutely.”  

Ms. Bush has reportedly spent almost $500,000 in campaign funds on her private security. She has alleged that the outlay is necessary because (among other things) of “racist attempts made against my life,” including, even as a member of Congress, police officers threatening her life. “I have private security because my body is worth being on this planet right now… So suck it up and defunding the police has to happen.”

Unlike the vast majority of Americans, billionaires and celebrity politicians protected by their own designated police officers or the proverbial “hired guns” don’t have to worry about how the restrictive gun control laws they champion actually affect ordinary citizens. For instance, the same protests and violence that prompted the creation of Mayor Lightfoot’s special Unit 544 left less exalted residents across Chicago vulnerable. A report by the city’s Office of Inspector General describes how the onset of the 2020 events found the Chicago Police Department “outflanked, under-equipped, and unprepared to respond to the scale of the protests and unrest with which they were met in the downtown area and across Chicago’s neighborhoods.”

In a 2021 interview by the Washington Post, Ms. Bush claimed (while “two security agents trailed her along the tour through St. Louis”), that her policies wouldn’t impact poor communities. “You call 911, they will still be the same as what it is now... If you have violence happening and you call the police, they will still show up.”

Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt (R), though, recently described Bush’s “defund the police” remarks as “incredibly irresponsible” and a “slap in the face” to crime victims. She “told everybody else suck it up” while “St. Louis had a 50-year high in homicides last year, Kansas City had an all-time high in homicides last year— those two cities are actually moving forward with the funding police departments. So this isn’t just rhetoric anymore, this is reality here in the heartland…We’re never going to defund the police here in Missouri, not now, not ever if I have anything to do with it.”

To be clear – we aren’t taking issue with these politicians (or anyone else) spending tens or hundreds of thousands of their own dollars on whatever level of private security they feel is appropriate. It’s that imposing gun control from inside their own safety bubble means that less famous or financially blessed individuals are left with limited access to a lawfully acquired firearm or an adequately staffed police force when the need arises.    

So, while Cori Bush quite rightly maintains that her “body is worth being on this planet,” it’s not so clear that she and her progressive compatriots feel the same about yours.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Police
TRENDING NOW
Massachusetts: Progressives Pass Radical Gun Control Bill

Friday, July 19, 2024

Massachusetts: Progressives Pass Radical Gun Control Bill

Progressive politicians in Massachusetts just passed one of the most extreme gun control bills in the country.

Massachusetts: Gov. Healey Signs Radical Gun Control Into Law

Thursday, July 25, 2024

Massachusetts: Gov. Healey Signs Radical Gun Control Into Law

On Thursday, July 25th, Governor Maura Healey (D) signed H. 4885, "an act modernizing firearm laws," one of the most extreme gun control bills in the country, into law.

Trump’s Running Mate, JD Vance, is a True Second Amendment Champion

News  

Monday, July 22, 2024

Trump’s Running Mate, JD Vance, is a True Second Amendment Champion

Last week, Sen. JD Vance (R-OH), accepted the Republican party’s nomination for vice president at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, WI.

Massachusetts: Senate Passes Sweeping Gun Control Without Public Hearing

Friday, February 2, 2024

Massachusetts: Senate Passes Sweeping Gun Control Without Public Hearing

On Thursday, February 1st, the Senate passed S.2572 late in the night without the bill ever receiving a public hearing, ignoring the concerns of Minority Leader Bruce Tarr and second amendment advocates across the state. 

NRA Scores Legal Victory Against ATF; “Pistol Brace Rule” Enjoined From Going Into Effect Against NRA Members

Monday, April 1, 2024

NRA Scores Legal Victory Against ATF; “Pistol Brace Rule” Enjoined From Going Into Effect Against NRA Members

NRA Members Among the Largest Class Protected from Draconian Rule

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging ATF’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule

News  

Second Amendment  

Monday, July 22, 2024

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging ATF’s “Engaged in the Business” Rule

The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) has filed a lawsuit challenging the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (ATF) “Engaged in the Business” Final Rule. The ATF’s Final Rule unlawfully redefines when a person ...

Appeals Court: 21+ Age Requirement for Carry Permits is Unconstitutional

News  

Monday, July 22, 2024

Appeals Court: 21+ Age Requirement for Carry Permits is Unconstitutional

In another Bruen-based invalidation of a gun law, a federal appeals court has struck a Minnesota law that prohibits 18 to 20-year-olds from being eligible for a carry permit, declaring the law to be invalid and ...

Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in NRA-ILA-Supported Challenge to Delaware’s ban on “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in NRA-ILA-Supported Challenge to Delaware’s ban on “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.”

On Monday, July 15, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association v. Delaware Department of Safety & Homeland Security, NRA-ILA’s lawsuit challenging ...

District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction in NRA’s Challenge to New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Law

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction in NRA’s Challenge to New Mexico’s 7-Day Waiting Period Law

Yesterday, in Ortega v. Grisham, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against New Mexico’s law requiring individuals to wait 7 ...

VA Tells Congressional Panel it “Could Not” and “Would Not” Comply with Pro-gun Legislation

News  

Monday, July 15, 2024

VA Tells Congressional Panel it “Could Not” and “Would Not” Comply with Pro-gun Legislation

Last Wednesday, the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs of the House Veterans Affairs Committee held a legislative hearing on a number of proposed bills that would change various procedures and standards for how the Department ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.