Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Helping Those in Crisis – and Gun Control, too

Monday, May 17, 2021

Helping Those in Crisis – and Gun Control, too

The researchers behind The Violence Project mass shooting database launched the next phase of their work on Friday, May 14th. The Off-Ramp Project is a set of resources designed to help prevent mass shootings by getting people in crisis the help they need. Criminologist James Densley and psychologist Jill Peterson begin with an insightful model built on years of work but ultimately kiss the ring of gun control. 

Densley and Peterson built their database, in part with a grant from the Department of Justice, to understand the pathway to violence and to develop methods to reroute that pathway. The database strives to include more than 160 variables on the perpetrators of mass shootings, including life history and experience variables to help understand the root causes of mass shootings to prevent them. The off-ramp approach is focused on recognizing the signs of crisis and intervening properly, even beyond the moment of crisis.

They detail “gun violence” by type: suicides, homicides, domestic violence, and mass shootings. They note that the types of firearms commonly used in mass shootings are “mostly handguns, but a larger proportion of rifles than in other categories of shootings.” They also note that the most commonly used firearms in criminal homicides are “illegally possessed handguns.” Rifles are not commonly used in murders or suicides, so a “larger proportion” used in mass shootings is not necessarily an indicator of really anything.

The Off-Ramp Project website lists resources at the state and national levels for crisis-intervention, mental health, and advocacy. The “advocacy” links are resources for shelters and mental health advocates. The researchers’ gun control leanings were first exposed when the increase in gun sales last year was mentioned in a list of reasons for an increase in “gun violence” in the same period. The casual reference to a “policy” section on their website piqued our curiosity but ultimately soured us on their objectivity.

The policy page presents a different sort of advocacy – unabashed gun control. Five of the first six listings on the Policy page are gun control organizations and the sixth is H.R. 8, a background check bill that is the beginning of a firearms registry.

Brady, Stop Handgun Violence, Moms Demand Action, Giffords, and Everytown are listed as “policy-relevant organizations,” revealing precisely the sort of policies the researchers believe are relevant.

The researchers promoted red flag laws, permits to purchase, universal background checks, and limiting magazine capacity – though Densley also said assault weapons bans should be discussed – as opportunities to prevent mass shootings. Densley claimed that there was a lot of research to support red flag laws, that permits to purchase are a mechanism to close loopholes, and that magazine capacity limits – and assault weapons bans – are driven by data.

The “Science of Gun Policy” review team at the Rand Corporation couldn’t find that data. They concluded that licensing and permitting requirements have an uncertain effect on suicide, on homicides, and on mass shootings; that private-seller background checks have an uncertain effect on firearms homicides and all background checks have an uncertain effect on mass shootings; and that assault weapons bans have uncertain effects on homicides and on mass shootings. Red flag laws are still quite new and the only available research has been observational, but it has shown that, in many cases, the subject of the red flag order is neither arrested nor transported for a mental health evaluation. The subject is required to turn over any firearms and then left to his or her own devices – in a home that may very well contain knives, automobiles, toxic chemicals, and/or many other potential implements of harm.

The prestigious heads of the gun control research centers at UC Davis and the Bloomberg School of Public Health found that comprehensive background checks have no effect on homicide rates. The Review Panel investigating the Virginia Tech mass shooting recognized that magazine capacity limits would not have made much difference in the incident.

The Off-Ramp Project has a lot of promise in terms of encouraging interventions that could prevent violence. It’s a shame they’ve let their brand and their work be co-opted by organizations that politicize mass shootings to promote a radical anti-gun agenda.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Research Bias
TRENDING NOW
Prohibitionists Seek to Weaponize Yet Another Federal Agency to Target Guns

News  

Monday, February 6, 2023

Prohibitionists Seek to Weaponize Yet Another Federal Agency to Target Guns

Ambitious gun control advocates have long sought a “whole of government approach” to stamping out the right to keep and bear arms. This involves weaponizing not just the ATF and FBI against gun owners and ...

Updates to ATF Final Rule on Stabilizing Braces

News  

Monday, January 30, 2023

Updates to ATF Final Rule on Stabilizing Braces

On Monday, January 30, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives’ (ATF) published the final Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached “Stabilizing Braces” rule for public inspection in the federal register.

ATF Posts “Final” Rule on Stabilizing Braces

News  

Tuesday, January 17, 2023

ATF Posts “Final” Rule on Stabilizing Braces

On Friday, January, 13, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) posted the “final” Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached “Stabilizing Braces” rule to its website.

Biden-Appointed Judge Issues PI against New Jersey Anti-Gun “Public Nuisance” Law

News  

Monday, February 6, 2023

Biden-Appointed Judge Issues PI against New Jersey Anti-Gun “Public Nuisance” Law

New Jersey’s losing streak trying to defend its recent gun control laws in court continued last Tuesday when a federal judge – appointed by Joe Biden, no less – issued a preliminary injunction against enforcement of a ...

Florida: Constitutional Carry Introduced

Monday, January 30, 2023

Florida: Constitutional Carry Introduced

Today, Representative Chuck Brannan (R-10) filed House Bill 543, the NRA-backed constitutional carry bill. The Constitutional Rights, Rule of Law & Government Operations Subcommittee will hear it on February 7th from 4-6PM. Florida is currently in ...

Anti-Gun Group Wants California to Continue as Petri Dish for Failed Anti-Gun Policies

News  

Monday, February 6, 2023

Anti-Gun Group Wants California to Continue as Petri Dish for Failed Anti-Gun Policies

In a move that could have been predicted by anyone with a pulse, anti-gun extremists are calling for more anti-gun policies to be implemented in arguably the most anti-gun state in the nation: California.

Washington: Hearing Rescheduled & Updates on Other Anti-Gun Bills

Friday, February 3, 2023

Washington: Hearing Rescheduled & Updates on Other Anti-Gun Bills

On February 9th, the Senate Law and Justice Committee will hold a public hearing for Senate Bill 5232, the companion to House Bill 1144, which imposes a firearm permit requirement, a 10-day waiting period scheme, and allows indefinite ...

New Mexico: Radical Gun Restrictions on Deck in Committee Next Week: Magazine Limits, Waiting Periods, Semi-Auto, Suppressor & NFA Bans

Friday, February 3, 2023

New Mexico: Radical Gun Restrictions on Deck in Committee Next Week: Magazine Limits, Waiting Periods, Semi-Auto, Suppressor & NFA Bans

On Monday, February 6, the New Mexico Senate Health & Public Affairs Committee will hold a public hearing on Senate Bill 171 by Sen. Bill Soules (D-Las Cruces), legislation that attempts to supersede federal law and make it a ...

Minnesota: Gun Control Bills Committee Hearing on Friday!

Wednesday, February 1, 2023

Minnesota: Gun Control Bills Committee Hearing on Friday!

Friday morning at 8:30 a.m. the Public Safety Finance and Policy committee will meet in Capitol Room 120 to vote on numerous gun control bills. Please contact the committee members today asking them to oppose the "red ...

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Invalidates ATF Bump-Stock Rule—Holds that Congress, Not ATF, Declares What the Law Is.

News  

Monday, January 9, 2023

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Invalidates ATF Bump-Stock Rule—Holds that Congress, Not ATF, Declares What the Law Is.

On Friday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, invalidated the ATF’s Rule classifying bump stocks as machine guns under the Administrative Procedure Act.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.