Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

Everytown’s “Grandad” Misses the Mark

Friday, September 16, 2016

Everytown’s “Grandad” Misses the Mark

Proponents of Maine’s Question 3, regulating every firearm sale and “transfer” (a change in possession, without a sale or change in ownership) have released a television ad urging voters to support this misguided ballot measure.

In the ad by the Everytown for Gun Safety affiliate, grandpa is shown in the woods with his young grandson. Grandpa says the shotgun he has is the same one his grandfather used in teaching him to shoot. He notes the importance of instructing his grandson on how “to be responsible and safe” when using a gun. “Responsible gun ownership starts with a background check,” he says, looking off sideways.

There are a lot of things sideways in this ad. 

If the intention is to highlight the value of background checks, it’s peculiar to use a scenario that bypasses these checks entirely. Grandad’s own acquisition of the gun didn’t involve any background check, being obtained through a family gift or inheritance. And although the shotgun appears to change hands during the ad – each change being a “transfer” regulated by Question 3 – transfers between a grandfather and grandchild are within the limited few exceptions allowed by Question 3 to the mandatory background check requirement.

A more apt or relevant Question 3 setting would show Grandad trying to loan the same shotgun to a godchild or a friend’s child to use to go shooting, a “transfer” that Question 3 prohibits entirely if the borrower is aged under 18. Question 3 contains a “stealth” prohibition on most firearm transfers, gifts and loans to youths, even if the transfer is completely legal under federal and current state law. 

By compelling a federally licensed firearm dealer to process private gun transfers “as if” the dealer is selling the gun out of its own inventory, the dealer is bound by a federal law that prohibits dealer sales of long guns to persons aged less than 18 years old, even where the transfer involved is not a sale. 

The ad claims that “dangerous criminals… can buy guns from strangers online or at a gun show. No background check required, no questions asked.” Disregarding the use of “can” rather than “do,” Maine law prohibits criminals from owning or possessing guns; similarly, a prohibited felon who possesses or receives a gun, regardless of the means through which the sale or acquisition occurs, commits a federal felony. 

Federal firearms law also prohibits private sellers from selling or transferring guns if the seller knows or has reason to believe that the buyer cannot legally possess firearms. Persons who buy guns online through the website of a gun dealer or gun shop have to go through a background check, and the same federal law requires dealers at gun shows to conduct background checks of prospective buyers. Studies of criminals themselves suggest that the overwhelming majority obtain their guns illegally, through channels other than gun shows or the Internet. 

While the ad’s message is all about being “responsible and safe” with guns, the ad, amazingly, disregards basic fundamentals of safe gun handling. Neither Grandad nor his grandson appear equipped with eye and hearing protection while shooting. This depiction isn’t too surprising given that actual firearm safety has never been the focus of gun control groups. Despite the moniker, Everytown for Gun Safety – unlike the NRA – doesn’t make available actual gun safety training services, programs or classes for adults and children who want to be “responsible and safe” with guns. 

What gun control entities like Everytown do produce for public consumption (apart from mugs and magnets) is dodgy ads and skewed studies.

A “first-of-its-kind investigation in Vermont show[ing] criminals flocking to vast online gun marketplace to evade background checks” unveiled by Everytown in 2015 to promote policies  like Question 3, actually falsely mischaracterized ads by licensed dealers, resulting in an investigation and rebuke from the Office of the Attorney General in Vermont. Early this year, we analyzed a similar “study” Everytown released about Nevada and allegedly private gun sales.

As we said at that time, Everytown and its affiliates are selling the notion that ballot initiatives like Question 3, which allow the state to insert itself into almost every gun “transfer,” will make citizens safer. Encumbering law-abiding gun owners with new legal requirements, paperwork and fees will do nothing to stop criminals from flouting the law, and talking up stricter background check requirements ignores the fact that Maine is already among the safest of states.

Maine’s reputation for safety and its top ranking among the most patriotic of states owes much to the traditional values and good sense of its residents. Though we don’t always do things “the way granddaddy did,” the fight to preserve our rights and freedoms remains, as it has for generations.

TRENDING NOW
Ammunition Serialization: The Five-Cent Fiasco in Illinois

News  

Monday, March 30, 2026

Ammunition Serialization: The Five-Cent Fiasco in Illinois

Democrat officials in Illinois have long taken unabashed pride in the abridgement of Second Amendment rights, and their latest attempt at “bullet control” is again making headlines.

Connecticut: Pistol Ban Advances in the Legislature

Sunday, March 29, 2026

Connecticut: Pistol Ban Advances in the Legislature

Last week, the Connecticut Judiciary Committee voted to advance HB5043 - A bill championed by Governor Ned Lamount aimed at banning so-called "convertible pistols".

California Court’s “Technical Issue” Nullifies Background Checks

News  

Monday, March 30, 2026

California Court’s “Technical Issue” Nullifies Background Checks

California, already well known for its de-policing, non-prosecution, and other soft-on-crime policies, has taken enabling criminals to a whole new level.

Is Finland Looking to Emulate America’s Founding Era on Firearms?

News  

Monday, March 30, 2026

Is Finland Looking to Emulate America’s Founding Era on Firearms?

We’ve written before about Finland, a European nation with arguably better gun laws than the majority of the continent.  

“Gun Free Zones” Herd Honest Citizens into Physical and Legal Peril

News  

Monday, March 30, 2026

“Gun Free Zones” Herd Honest Citizens into Physical and Legal Peril

Never mind the homelessness, drug use, and routine violence … according to Empire State politicians, New York City’s transit system is a “sensitive place.”

Study: Entrenched and Intensifying Leftist Bias in Social Science Research

News  

Monday, March 30, 2026

Study: Entrenched and Intensifying Leftist Bias in Social Science Research

A new study by James Manzi of the U.K.’s Oxford University has now confirmed what everyday Americans have seen for themselves at college and university campuses across the country.

NRA Defeats California Gun Control Law; State Must Pay Nearly $500,000 in Attorney Fees Incurred by NRA

Monday, March 23, 2026

NRA Defeats California Gun Control Law; State Must Pay Nearly $500,000 in Attorney Fees Incurred by NRA

Today, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California granted a stipulation for final judgment and permanent injunction in Safari Club International v. Bonta, under which the state conceded that its firearm advertising restriction is unconstitutional ...

NRA Seeks to Invalidate California’s Handgun “Roster” in Legal Challenge

News  

Monday, March 30, 2026

NRA Seeks to Invalidate California’s Handgun “Roster” in Legal Challenge

The National Rifle Association has taken legal action challenging California’s Handgun Roster, a regulatory regime that effectively bans most commonly owned handguns.

Virginia: Legislature Adjourns from 2026 Session; Anti-Gun Bills on Governor's Desk

Sunday, March 15, 2026

Virginia: Legislature Adjourns from 2026 Session; Anti-Gun Bills on Governor's Desk

On Saturday, March 14th, the Virginia General Assembly adjourned sine die from the 2026 legislative session, and the future of the Commonwealth hangs in the balance. 

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to New York Law Targeting Firearms Industry

Monday, March 30, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to New York Law Targeting Firearms Industry

The National Rifle Association—joined by the Second Amendment Foundation, American Suppressor Association, and Independence Institute—has filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review in National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. James.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.