Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Illinois General Assembly And Supreme Court<br>Deliver Victories For Right To Keep And Bear Arms

Friday, November 19, 2004

It was an excellent week for the pro-gun movement in Illinois, as the General Assembly overrode Governor Rod Blagojevich`s (D) veto of pro-gun legislation, and the Supreme Court dismissed Chicago`s reckless lawsuit against gun manufacturers.

On Tuesday, November 16, the House of Representatives voted 85-30 (71 votes needed) to override Blagojevich`s veto of SB 2165, which followed last week`s successful override vote in the Senate. SB 2165, which became law shortly after the vote, provides an affirmative defense for a gun owner if he uses a firearm prohibited by local ordinance in defense of himself or others. This legislation was inspired by the outrageous prosecution of Hale DeMar—a man in Wilmette, Illinois, who was forced to use a handgun to defend himself and his family against a convicted criminal who had broken into his home for the second time in as many nights. Apparently ignoring the will of the General Assembly, the Village of Wilmette has threatened to pass its own ordinance it claims will exempt it from this law, and allow it to continue to persecute citizens who use a handgun in defense of their lives and the lives of their loved ones. We will follow closely any developments on this front.

Following closely on the heels of this legislative victory, the Illinois Supreme Court delivered a judicial victory on Thursday, November 18, when it dismissed a liability lawsuit filed by the city of Chicago against gun manufacturers. Stating there is no legal cause to hold manufacturers responsible for the acts of third party criminals, the court told Chicago and anti-gun Mayor Richard Daley (D), in effect, "It`s the criminals, stupid!" Justice Rita Garmen wrote, "The mere fact that defendants` conduct in their plants, offices, and stores puts guns into the stream of commerce does not state a claim for public nuisance." She went on to say, "It is the presence and use of the guns within the City of Chicago that constitutes the alleged nuisance, not the activities at the defendants` various places of business."

"Today`s decision affirms the argument we have been making since the beginning of these reckless city lawsuits—product manufacturers are not responsible for the actions of criminals," said NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox "We applaud the Illinois Supreme Court for upholding common sense in the face of politically motivated lawsuits."

Chicago`s lawsuit was just one of many attempts by anti-gun extremists to bankrupt the American firearm industry with predatory, frivolous litigation, with most courts also throwing out such cases.

Cox added, "These lawsuits seek to undermine our country`s long-standing heritage of firearms ownership. The highest court in Illinois has ruled decisively. Now perhaps Mayor Daley and other big-city politicians can concentrate on the real solution to lower crime—getting criminals off the streets so they no longer pose a threat to our families and businesses."

Lawrence G. Keane, senior vice president and general counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the firearm industry`s trade association, said of the ruling, "Today`s decision is the latest in a long list of appellate court decisions that have rejected politically motivated ‘junk` lawsuits that have tried to blame the makers of well-made, lawfully sold firearms for the actions of criminals."

TRENDING NOW
Students “School” Antigun Education Officials on Civil Rights, Receive Large Settlements in Court Cases

News  

Monday, July 19, 2021

Students “School” Antigun Education Officials on Civil Rights, Receive Large Settlements in Court Cases

Last September we reported on the saga of Ka'Mauri Harrison, a Louisiana elementary school student who was suspended for having a BB gun that happened to come into view while the fourth grader was participating in online ...

Canada’s Gun Confiscation Scheme: Still More Questions than Answers

News  

Monday, July 19, 2021

Canada’s Gun Confiscation Scheme: Still More Questions than Answers

On June 29, Yves Giroux, Canada’s Parliamentary Budget Officer, released a report on the estimated cost of implementing the firearm confiscation (“buyback”) program that is part of the sweeping Order-in-Council announced by Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Keith Olbermann Revealed as Functional Illiterate

News  

Monday, July 19, 2021

Keith Olbermann Revealed as Functional Illiterate

Tired crank Keith Olbermann reached a new low in weak-minded rhetoric in recent months with his doltish insight into the Second Amendment. According to the former MSNBC bloviator, the Second Amendment does not protect an individual right ...

Louisiana: Betrayal at the Capitol

Wednesday, July 21, 2021

Louisiana: Betrayal at the Capitol

Yesterday, SB 118, Constitutional Carry, was defeated due to several Senators reversing their initial vote of support on the bill.  Two of the Senators who flip-flopped were Senators Patrick Connick (SD-8) and Louie Bernard (SD-31). 

Research Update: It’s [Still] Not the Guns

News  

Monday, July 19, 2021

Research Update: It’s [Still] Not the Guns

Much has changed since last summer. In July 2020, notoriously anti-gun researchers circulated a paper that alleged an association between what they deemed “excess” gun purchases early in the pandemic and violence. This year, the same ...

Forty-Three Amicus Briefs Filed In Support OF NRA-ILA Backed Second Amendment Case Before Supreme Court

Wednesday, July 21, 2021

Forty-Three Amicus Briefs Filed In Support OF NRA-ILA Backed Second Amendment Case Before Supreme Court

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court decided to hear the NRA-ILA backed case challenging New York’s restrictive concealed-carry-licensing regime. And just last week, NRA-ILA filed the opening brief in this crucial case, which is located here.

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Monday, June 30, 2014

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Joe Biden Wants to Ban 9mm Pistols

News  

Monday, November 25, 2019

Joe Biden Wants to Ban 9mm Pistols

A week after he told voters that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect “a magazine with a hundred clips in it,” 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidate Joe Biden offered supporters more of his singular brand of anti-gun ...

NRA-ILA Applauds Rep. Claudia Tenney and U.S. House of Representatives’ Amicus Brief Supporting Second Amendment Case Before Supreme Court

Tuesday, July 20, 2021

NRA-ILA Applauds Rep. Claudia Tenney and U.S. House of Representatives’ Amicus Brief Supporting Second Amendment Case Before Supreme Court

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court decided to hear the NRA-ILA backed case challenging New York’s restrictive concealed-carry-licensing regime. NRA-ILA’s opening brief is located here.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.