Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

P*BS

Wednesday, June 4, 2003

The "Public" Broadcasting Service and Bill Moyers are using your tax dollars to deliver their biased view of the Second Amendment to the nation`s high schools.

by Robert G. Pew

It is well documented that the media elite are hostile to Second Amendment rights. That hostility is now taking shape in a direct effort to influence the way American children are taught about civil liberties.

The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) program now with Bill Moyers has included on its Web site (www.pbs.org/now/classroom/gun.html) an extensive "lesson plan" for teachers to instruct their high school students about the Second Amendment. Its title is the first sign that objectivity will not be a paramount goal: "Gun Control and Terrorism: Laws or Loopholes."

While the plan arguably has a paper-thin veneer of balance, an examination of the materials recommended as resources and the links provided to information sources quickly reveals that this "plan" has an ulterior motive: to promote the view that there is no individual right to bear arms.

The plan admits that NRA is a part of this debate, but provides only the most general information on NRA activities and positions, while providing specific links to fact sheets and opinion pieces from the gun-ban lobby--groups such as the Brady Campaign and the Violence Policy Center (VPC). Of the 12 people appearing in the piece, one is neutral, two are pro-gun rights and nine are hard-line anti-gun zealots such as u.s. Senators Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and Jack Reed, D-R.I. And that does not include the "reporter," Deborah Amos, who takes a pointedly anti-gun rights view throughout her report. Fairness is nowhere to be seen in this "lesson plan."

The PBS Web site promotes a November 2002 episode of now described as an "in-depth report of gun control and terrorism." In reality, however, it is simply an attack on Attorney General John Ashcroft and the rights of gun owners. The "in-depth report" makes no attempt to provide facts, instead providing a forum for an anti-gun diatribe. PBS` message is clear: America`s lax gun laws allow terrorists to arm themselves, and, therefore, the rights of law-abiding gun owners should be curtailed and their privacy invaded. The show fails to provide, however, any real evidence that the claims have merit.

The plan relies on sensationalized, politically charged hit pieces, such as the article "How u.s. Dealers Arm the World" from the hard-left The Nation as a resource recommended for teachers and students. It also provides direct links to two "fact sheets" from VPC that try to tie our Second Amendment freedoms to terrorists. It fails, however, to provide meaningful links to accurate, dispassionate information on firearms, firearms laws or the Second Amendment.

Most glaringly, the plan purports to lead a discussion in the meaning of the Second Amendment, but studiously ignores the multitude of scholarly articles that present the real issues of this debate. While the Brady Campaign`s distorted and ill-conceived arguments about the meaning of the Second Amendment are linked to directly, there is not even a partial listing of the myriad independent scholarly articles that have been written on the origins and evolution of the right to bear arms in America.

There is no reference to law journal articles or comprehensive studies by leading scholars such as William Van Alstyne, Akhil Reed Amar, Robert Cottrol, Clayton Cramer, Stephen Halbrook, Don B. Kates, David Kopel, Sanford Levinson, Nelson Lund, Joyce Lee Malcolm, Glenn Harlan Reynolds or Eugene Volokh, to name but a few. All these scholars have published widely on the right to keep and bear arms, and their research supports the historically accurate view that the Second Amendment protects an individual--not a collective--right.

The bias continues throughout the information provided. One link provides a "history" of gun control laws, with prefacing remarks that lament the lack of new gun control legislation or the passage of handgun registration. Moyers even provides a link to a site called "Sane Guns" which provides a "History of the NRA" that is simply an undisguised--but embarrassingly sloppy--attack on the Association. Perhaps it never occurred to Moyers to allow NRA to provide its own brief history. The message is easy to understand: current and additional gun laws are vital, reasonable and needed, and the "special interest" gun lobby is standing in the way of the national good.

This is not the first attack on the Second Amendment that has been financed by PBS with your tax dollars. It is simply the latest. However, its target should be of particular concern to all who value our liberties and the quality of education our youth receive.

By attempting to turn classrooms into echo chambers of anti-Second Amendment dogma, Moyers and PBS erode public trust in our schools.The future of our rights can only be protected if our children are taught that the fight is constant. To continue the fight, they must be armed with the truth, not shackled by revisionist history force fed them by an anti-gun elite. This effort by PBS to undermine the Second Amendment by spreading anti-gun propaganda in our schools will only succeed if we stand by and silently allow it.

Contacting PBS

You can make your voice heard by contacting PBS and its affiliates. The contact information for PBS is:

Public Broadcasting Service
1320 Braddock Place
Alexandria, Virginia 22314-1649
Phone: (703) 739-5000
Fax: (703) 739-0775

You can look up local PBS affiliates at www.pbs.org/stationfinder/ index.html. Also, you can contact your u.s. Senators and Congressman, as well as your state representatives and local officials, by using the "Write Your Representatives" feature at www.nraila.org. to let them know what you think about the expenditure of public money to promote an anti-gun political agenda.

Textbooks and the Second Amendment.

The effort to use our schools to indoctrinate the young people of America against the right to keep and bear arms is not new. A decade ago, the American Rifleman described a study of the content of textbooks used in classrooms around the country ("2nd Amendment: A Right Left Out," February 1993.) That study found that the most common treatment of the Second Amendment was to not treat it at all. Most textbooks simply failed to discuss the topic in any meaningful way. Those that did most often tied any right to bear arms to the militia or bluntly claimed there was no individual right to arms.

A review of textbooks today reveals that the Second Amendment is indeed included in more textbooks, but they teach that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms. In book after book, the same theme is repeated:

"A citizen`s right to bear arms is related to the maintenance of a militia."
--Americans: A History, McDougal, Littell & Company,
ISBN 0-8123-8300-1, pg. 173

"The 2nd Amendment is widely misunderstood. It was added to the Constitution to protect the right of each state to keep a militia."

--American Government, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-499207-5, pg. 522

"The Second Amendment guarantees Americans the right to serve in a state militia to bear arms."

--Economic Legal & Political Systems with Civics, Glencoe McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-02-821916-3, pg 78

"The Second Amendment . . . acknowledges the necessity of state militias to keep and bear arms."

--Exploring America`s Past, Holt Rinehart and Winston, ISBN 0-03-011634-1, pg. 163.

These inaccurate interpretations of the Constitution are presented as unchallenged fact. The interpretation supported by the overwhelming majority of constitutional scholars--that the Second Amendment protects an individual right--is completely ignored.

The lesson for parents here is apparent: we must all take care to know what is being taught in the textbooks our kids are reading, and take action to correct the inaccuracies or fill in the information they are not getting.

TRENDING NOW
Virginia Anti-gun Lawmakers Delay “Assault Firearm” Carry and Transportation Restriction

News  

Monday, July 6, 2026

Virginia Anti-gun Lawmakers Delay “Assault Firearm” Carry and Transportation Restriction

Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger (D) and the General Assembly’s ruling anti-gun majority have delayed the enactment of one of their most controversial pieces of legislation, a severe restriction on Virginians’ ability to move about the ...

Judge Rules Preliminary Injunction Against Virginia “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans Secured by NRA Applies Statewide

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

Judge Rules Preliminary Injunction Against Virginia “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans Secured by NRA Applies Statewide

In the NRA’s challenge to Virginia’s “assault firearm” and magazine bans, Santolla v. Katz, Judge Jeffrey L. Campbell of the Washington County Circuit Court issued a letter opinion yesterday making clear that the preliminary injunction ...

As the Court Decisions Roll In, Have Gun Controllers Finally Overplayed Their Hand?

News  

Thursday, July 2, 2026

As the Court Decisions Roll In, Have Gun Controllers Finally Overplayed Their Hand?

The final week of June brought a flurry of legal action on various gun control laws in the states.

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Challenges to “Assault Weapon” Bans

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Challenges to “Assault Weapon” Bans

Today, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases challenging bans on “assault weapons.”

Trump Reinforces Support for the Second Amendment During National AM250 Address

News  

Monday, July 13, 2026

Trump Reinforces Support for the Second Amendment During National AM250 Address

It may not need to be said, but we’ll keep saying it: Donald Trump is the most pro-Second Amendment president in the NRA’s history of protecting the right to keep and bear arms.  While the nation ...

Promises Made, Promises Kept: DOJ Keeps Up Second Amendment Offense

News  

Thursday, July 2, 2026

Promises Made, Promises Kept: DOJ Keeps Up Second Amendment Offense

We are not getting tired of heaping praise upon Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), as she continues to push the envelope when it comes ...

NRA Files Comments in Response to ATF’s Regulatory Reforms, Urges Participation!

News  

Monday, July 13, 2026

NRA Files Comments in Response to ATF’s Regulatory Reforms, Urges Participation!

Last week, NRA filed its first round of comments in response to ATF’s comprehensive regulatory overhaul. NRA’s latest input shows the Association’s efforts coming full circle.

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Illinois’s Waiting Period Requirement for Firearm Purchases

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Illinois’s Waiting Period Requirement for Firearm Purchases

The National Rifle Association filed a lawsuit challenging Illinois’s 72-hour waiting period requirement for firearm purchases.

President Trump Reiterates Support for National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity and NRA

News  

Monday, June 29, 2026

President Trump Reiterates Support for National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity and NRA

During remarks to American workers at a Mack Trucks facility in Macungie, Pa. on June 23, President Donald Trump reiterated his support for National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity and NRA.  

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging Sixth Circuit to Strike Down NFA Restrictions on Short-Barreled Rifles

Monday, July 13, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging Sixth Circuit to Strike Down NFA Restrictions on Short-Barreled Rifles

Today, the National Rifle Association, joined by the Firearms Policy Coalition, Second Amendment Foundation, and American Suppressor Association, filed an amicus brief in United States v. Machamer, urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.