Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

P*BS

Wednesday, June 4, 2003

The "Public" Broadcasting Service and Bill Moyers are using your tax dollars to deliver their biased view of the Second Amendment to the nation`s high schools.

by Robert G. Pew

It is well documented that the media elite are hostile to Second Amendment rights. That hostility is now taking shape in a direct effort to influence the way American children are taught about civil liberties.

The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) program now with Bill Moyers has included on its Web site (www.pbs.org/now/classroom/gun.html) an extensive "lesson plan" for teachers to instruct their high school students about the Second Amendment. Its title is the first sign that objectivity will not be a paramount goal: "Gun Control and Terrorism: Laws or Loopholes."

While the plan arguably has a paper-thin veneer of balance, an examination of the materials recommended as resources and the links provided to information sources quickly reveals that this "plan" has an ulterior motive: to promote the view that there is no individual right to bear arms.

The plan admits that NRA is a part of this debate, but provides only the most general information on NRA activities and positions, while providing specific links to fact sheets and opinion pieces from the gun-ban lobby--groups such as the Brady Campaign and the Violence Policy Center (VPC). Of the 12 people appearing in the piece, one is neutral, two are pro-gun rights and nine are hard-line anti-gun zealots such as u.s. Senators Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and Jack Reed, D-R.I. And that does not include the "reporter," Deborah Amos, who takes a pointedly anti-gun rights view throughout her report. Fairness is nowhere to be seen in this "lesson plan."

The PBS Web site promotes a November 2002 episode of now described as an "in-depth report of gun control and terrorism." In reality, however, it is simply an attack on Attorney General John Ashcroft and the rights of gun owners. The "in-depth report" makes no attempt to provide facts, instead providing a forum for an anti-gun diatribe. PBS` message is clear: America`s lax gun laws allow terrorists to arm themselves, and, therefore, the rights of law-abiding gun owners should be curtailed and their privacy invaded. The show fails to provide, however, any real evidence that the claims have merit.

The plan relies on sensationalized, politically charged hit pieces, such as the article "How u.s. Dealers Arm the World" from the hard-left The Nation as a resource recommended for teachers and students. It also provides direct links to two "fact sheets" from VPC that try to tie our Second Amendment freedoms to terrorists. It fails, however, to provide meaningful links to accurate, dispassionate information on firearms, firearms laws or the Second Amendment.

Most glaringly, the plan purports to lead a discussion in the meaning of the Second Amendment, but studiously ignores the multitude of scholarly articles that present the real issues of this debate. While the Brady Campaign`s distorted and ill-conceived arguments about the meaning of the Second Amendment are linked to directly, there is not even a partial listing of the myriad independent scholarly articles that have been written on the origins and evolution of the right to bear arms in America.

There is no reference to law journal articles or comprehensive studies by leading scholars such as William Van Alstyne, Akhil Reed Amar, Robert Cottrol, Clayton Cramer, Stephen Halbrook, Don B. Kates, David Kopel, Sanford Levinson, Nelson Lund, Joyce Lee Malcolm, Glenn Harlan Reynolds or Eugene Volokh, to name but a few. All these scholars have published widely on the right to keep and bear arms, and their research supports the historically accurate view that the Second Amendment protects an individual--not a collective--right.

The bias continues throughout the information provided. One link provides a "history" of gun control laws, with prefacing remarks that lament the lack of new gun control legislation or the passage of handgun registration. Moyers even provides a link to a site called "Sane Guns" which provides a "History of the NRA" that is simply an undisguised--but embarrassingly sloppy--attack on the Association. Perhaps it never occurred to Moyers to allow NRA to provide its own brief history. The message is easy to understand: current and additional gun laws are vital, reasonable and needed, and the "special interest" gun lobby is standing in the way of the national good.

This is not the first attack on the Second Amendment that has been financed by PBS with your tax dollars. It is simply the latest. However, its target should be of particular concern to all who value our liberties and the quality of education our youth receive.

By attempting to turn classrooms into echo chambers of anti-Second Amendment dogma, Moyers and PBS erode public trust in our schools.The future of our rights can only be protected if our children are taught that the fight is constant. To continue the fight, they must be armed with the truth, not shackled by revisionist history force fed them by an anti-gun elite. This effort by PBS to undermine the Second Amendment by spreading anti-gun propaganda in our schools will only succeed if we stand by and silently allow it.

Contacting PBS

You can make your voice heard by contacting PBS and its affiliates. The contact information for PBS is:

Public Broadcasting Service
1320 Braddock Place
Alexandria, Virginia 22314-1649
Phone: (703) 739-5000
Fax: (703) 739-0775

You can look up local PBS affiliates at www.pbs.org/stationfinder/ index.html. Also, you can contact your u.s. Senators and Congressman, as well as your state representatives and local officials, by using the "Write Your Representatives" feature at www.nraila.org. to let them know what you think about the expenditure of public money to promote an anti-gun political agenda.

Textbooks and the Second Amendment.

The effort to use our schools to indoctrinate the young people of America against the right to keep and bear arms is not new. A decade ago, the American Rifleman described a study of the content of textbooks used in classrooms around the country ("2nd Amendment: A Right Left Out," February 1993.) That study found that the most common treatment of the Second Amendment was to not treat it at all. Most textbooks simply failed to discuss the topic in any meaningful way. Those that did most often tied any right to bear arms to the militia or bluntly claimed there was no individual right to arms.

A review of textbooks today reveals that the Second Amendment is indeed included in more textbooks, but they teach that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms. In book after book, the same theme is repeated:

"A citizen`s right to bear arms is related to the maintenance of a militia."
--Americans: A History, McDougal, Littell & Company,
ISBN 0-8123-8300-1, pg. 173

"The 2nd Amendment is widely misunderstood. It was added to the Constitution to protect the right of each state to keep a militia."

--American Government, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-499207-5, pg. 522

"The Second Amendment guarantees Americans the right to serve in a state militia to bear arms."

--Economic Legal & Political Systems with Civics, Glencoe McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-02-821916-3, pg 78

"The Second Amendment . . . acknowledges the necessity of state militias to keep and bear arms."

--Exploring America`s Past, Holt Rinehart and Winston, ISBN 0-03-011634-1, pg. 163.

These inaccurate interpretations of the Constitution are presented as unchallenged fact. The interpretation supported by the overwhelming majority of constitutional scholars--that the Second Amendment protects an individual right--is completely ignored.

The lesson for parents here is apparent: we must all take care to know what is being taught in the textbooks our kids are reading, and take action to correct the inaccuracies or fill in the information they are not getting.

TRENDING NOW
Kamala for Gun Confiscation: In Her Own Words

News  

Monday, September 16, 2024

Kamala for Gun Confiscation: In Her Own Words

During the September 10 presidential debate, President Donald Trump correctly highlighted Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris’s support for gun confiscation. A visibly defensive Harris claimed, “We're not taking anybody's guns away. So stop with the ...

Alabama: Montgomery Passes Illegal Gun Control Ordinance and Ignores Firearm Preemption Law

Wednesday, September 11, 2024

Alabama: Montgomery Passes Illegal Gun Control Ordinance and Ignores Firearm Preemption Law

Last week, on September 6, Montgomery, Alabama, Mayor Steven Reed signed a gun control ordinance requiring a valid photo ID to carry a concealed firearm in a vehicle or on one's person in the City of Montgomery. ...

Has Harris Clarified Her Stance on Gun Confiscation?

News  

Monday, September 16, 2024

Has Harris Clarified Her Stance on Gun Confiscation?

Now deep into her second national campaign, you would think we would have a clear message from Vice President Kamala Harris on where she stands on guns and the Second Amendment.

The Anti-Gun Myth: There’s No “Good Guy with a Gun”

News  

Monday, September 16, 2024

The Anti-Gun Myth: There’s No “Good Guy with a Gun”

A 2023 Pew Research Center poll on gun ownership and public safety in America indicated that the overwhelming majority of Democrat and Democratic-leaning adults (86%) felt the nation’s gun laws should be even more strict.

Kamala Harris is an Existential Threat to the Second Amendment and Supports Gun Confiscation

News  

Monday, July 29, 2024

Kamala Harris is an Existential Threat to the Second Amendment and Supports Gun Confiscation

Since President Joe Biden unceremoniously dropped out, or was forced out, of the 2024 presidential race on July 21, Vice President Kamala Harris has been effectively coronated as the Democratic presidential nominee.

As-Applied Challenge to Illinois Ban on Licensees’ Carrying on Public Transit Succeeds; Court Rejects “Breathtaking, Jawdropping, and Eyepopping” Arguments

News  

Tuesday, September 10, 2024

As-Applied Challenge to Illinois Ban on Licensees’ Carrying on Public Transit Succeeds; Court Rejects “Breathtaking, Jawdropping, and Eyepopping” Arguments

Long before the United States Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen (2022), a federal appellate court relied on the right to bear arms for self-defense to invalidate an Illinois law that ...

NRA Scores Legal Victory Against ATF; “Pistol Brace Rule” Enjoined From Going Into Effect Against NRA Members

Monday, April 1, 2024

NRA Scores Legal Victory Against ATF; “Pistol Brace Rule” Enjoined From Going Into Effect Against NRA Members

NRA Members Among the Largest Class Protected from Draconian Rule

Press Covers for Kamala Harris’s Clear Record on Gun Confiscation

News  

Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Press Covers for Kamala Harris’s Clear Record on Gun Confiscation

The legacy media has mostly given up the pretense of carrying out its once-professed mission – holding power to account. At this point, no reasonable person expects the regime press to cover legitimate news that ...

Massachusetts: Gov. Healey Signs Radical Gun Control Into Law

Thursday, July 25, 2024

Massachusetts: Gov. Healey Signs Radical Gun Control Into Law

On Thursday, July 25th, Governor Maura Healey (D) signed H. 4885, "an act modernizing firearm laws," one of the most extreme gun control bills in the country, into law.

California: State Legislature Adjourns as More Gun Control Heads to the Governor’s Desk

Wednesday, September 4, 2024

California: State Legislature Adjourns as More Gun Control Heads to the Governor’s Desk

On August 31, the California legislature adjourned after passing three anti-gun bills in the final days of the 2023-2024 session. These bills will now head to Governor Newsom for his signature. Please click the Take ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.