Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

NRA`s Friend Of The Court Brief In U.S. V. Emerson

Tuesday, February 15, 2000

__________________

No. 99-10331
__________________

IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TIMOTHY JOE EMERSON
Defendant-Appellee
__________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Texas, San Angelo Division
__________________

BRIEF SUPPORTING APPELLEE OF AMICUS CURIAE
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
__________________

Of Counsel:
Professor Nicholas J. Johnson
140 W. 62nd Street, Room 226
New York, N.Y. 10023
(212) 636-6983

Robert Dowlut
11250 Waples Mill Rd. 6N (NRA)
Fairfax, VA 22030-7400
(703) 267-1254
Fax (703) 267-3985
Counsel for Amicus Curiae



IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Appeal Numbers 99-10331

Plaintiff-Appellant


v.

) Appeal from U.S. District Court, Northern
) District of Texas
) San Angelo Division
) Criminal No. 6:98CR103C
) Honorable Sam R. Cummings

Defendant-Appellee
TIMOTHY JOE EMERSON,

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

The undersigned counsel of record for amicus curiae National Rifle Association of America (NRA) certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal.

Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross Appellee:

United States of America

Represented by:

William Bryan Mateja
U. S. Attorney`s Office
1205 Texas Avenue, 7th Floor
Lubbock, Texas 79401

Defendant-Appellee-Cross Appellant:

Timothy Joe Emerson

Represented by:

Timothy Crooks
Federal Public Defender
600 Texas Street, Suite 100
Fort Worth, Texas 76102-4612

Amicus Curiae:
National Rifle Association of America is a New York not-for-profit corporation. It has not issued stock or debt securities to the public. It is recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as a 26 U.S.C. Sec. 501(c)(4) entity.

Represented by:

Robert Dowlut
11250 Waples Mill Rd., 6N (NRA)
Fairfax, Virginia 22030-7400
Attorney for Amicus Curiae

Respectfully submitted,

________________________________
Robert Dowlut
Attorney for Amicus Curiae NRA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certificate of Interested Persons

Table of Authorities

Statement of Interest and Identity of Amicus Curiae National Rifle Association of America

Summary of Argument

Argument

I. The Second Amendment protects the fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms

A. The text and history of the Second Amendment are consistent and unambiguous

B. The right to keep and bear arms continues to serve its constitutional purpose in contemporary America

II. Supreme Court precedent does not support the constitutionality of the government`s attempted application of section 922(g)(8)

A. The Miller decision

B. Miller accepted the individual right interpretation of the Second Amendment

C. Miller`s holding applies only to weapons peculiarly adapted to criminal purposes

III. The Fifth Circuit precedents cited by the government do not address the issue in this case

IV. Precedent from other circuits provide no persuasive reason to accept the government`s attempted application of Sec. 922(g)(8)

A. The "states` right" theory should not be adopted by this Court

B. This Court should not adopt an interpretation of Miller that renders the Second Amendment a dead letter

Conclusion

Certificate of Service

Certificate of Compliance

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

Aymette v. State, 21 Tenn. (2 Hum.) 154 (1840)
Cases v. United States, 131 F.2d 916 (1st Cir. 1942), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 770 (1943)

DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989)

Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)
Gillespie v. City of Indianapolis, 185 F.3d 693 (7th Cir. 1999)
Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 912 (1996)
Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 (1980)
Love v. Pepersack, 47 F.3d 120 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 813 (1995)
Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886)
Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove, 695 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863 (1983)

Saenz v. Heldenfels Brothers, Inc., 183 F.3d 389 (5th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336 (1971)
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

v

United States v. Friel, 1 F.3d 1231 (1st Cir. 1993)
United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016 (8th Cir. 1992) cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 (1993)
United States v. Johnson
, 497 F.2d 548 (4th Cir. 1974)
United States v. Johnson, 441 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
United States v. Oakes, 564 F.2d 384 (10th Cir. 1977) cert. denied, 435 U.S. 926 (1978)

United States v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273 (3d Cir. 1996) cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 46 (1997)
United States v. Stevens, 440 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Toner, 728 F.2d 115 (2d Cir. 1984)
United States v. Tot, 131 F.2d 261 (3rd Cir. 1942), rev`d on other grounds, 319 U.S. 463 (1943)

United States v. Warin, 530 F.2d 103 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 426 U.S. 948 (1976)

United States v. Williams, 446 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Wright, 117 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 584 (1997)

Constitutional and Statutory Provisions

10 U.S.C. Sec. 311

18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(8)

Act of May 8, 1792, ch. 33, 1 Stat. 271

Articles of Confederation art. VI, para. 4

U.S. Const. art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 16

Other Authorities

William Blackstone, Commentaries (St. George Tucker ed. 1803)

Thomas M. Cooley, The General Principles of Constitutional Law in the United States of America (2d ed. 1891)

3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45 (2d ed. 1836)

3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 425 (3d ed. 1937)

Robert J. Cottrol & Raymond T. Diamond, The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration, 80 Georgetown L.J. 309 (1991)

2 Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal Convention (1911)

The Federalist (C. Rossiter ed., 1961)

Don B. Kates, The Second Amendment and the Ideology of Self-Protection, 9 Const. Commentary 87 (1992)

Gary Kleck, Targeting Guns: Firearms and their Control (Aldine de Gruyter 1997)

Gary Kleck & Marc Gertz, Ar

TRENDING NOW
Dick’s Spends Big on Gun-Chopping, Virtue-Signaling Bonanza (But It Will Still Sell You a Firearm)

News  

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Dick’s Spends Big on Gun-Chopping, Virtue-Signaling Bonanza (But It Will Still Sell You a Firearm)

Ed Stack, the CEO of Dick’s Sporting Goods, wants you to know he’s committed to keeping AR-15s “off the street.” But he’s also committed (for the time being) to selling other types of firearms.

California: Anti-Gun and Anti-Hunting Bill Signed into Law

Monday, October 14, 2019

California: Anti-Gun and Anti-Hunting Bill Signed into Law

Prior to the October 13 deadline, Governor Newsom signed the final anti-gun and anti-hunting bills, AB 1254 and SB 172 into law.  

California: Governor Newsom Signs Anti-Gun Bills into Law

Friday, October 11, 2019

California: Governor Newsom Signs Anti-Gun Bills into Law

Earlier today, Governor Newsom signed the seven anti-gun bills listed below into law.  

Number of Concealed Carry Permit Holders Increased Again

News  

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Number of Concealed Carry Permit Holders Increased Again

Last week, economist John Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center released “Concealed Carry Permit Holders Across the United States: 2019,” his annual report on the number of concealed carry permit holders in the U.S.

Kamala Harris and Her Perplexing Anti-Gun Ideas

News  

Friday, August 2, 2019

Kamala Harris and Her Perplexing Anti-Gun Ideas

U.S. Senator Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), one of the two-dozen Democrat presidential hopefuls vying to take on President Donald Trump in 2020, has been promoting her anti-gun platform for many months. This isn’t really news, as ...

Illinois: Task Force May Ponder More Gun Control

Tuesday, October 15, 2019

Illinois: Task Force May Ponder More Gun Control

The Illinois House Firearm Public Awareness Task Force is scheduled to meet on October 16, 2019. The task force could potentially make policy recommendations with various gun control schemes. %MCEPASTEBIN%

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Virginia’s Anti-gun Politicians Put Politics Before Fighting Gun Crime

News  

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Virginia’s Anti-gun Politicians Put Politics Before Fighting Gun Crime

Virginia’s anti-gun politicians are serious about attacking law-abiding gun owners, but are indifferent about actual gun crime. As highlighted in a recent report in the Washington Free Beacon by Stephen Gutowski, the Virginia Department of Justice Services ...

Member Spotlight: Meet the Police Officer Who Told Congress She ‘Would Not Comply' with a Gun Ban

News  

Friday, October 4, 2019

Member Spotlight: Meet the Police Officer Who Told Congress She ‘Would Not Comply' with a Gun Ban

Last week, a retired Tulsa, Oklahoma law enforcement officer testified in a Congressional hearing that she “would not comply” if Congress passes a ban on firearms. Her bold assertion earned her national media attention and ...

Grassroots Spotlight: NRA-ILA Fighting the Bloomberg Money In Virginia 2019 Elections

News  

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Grassroots Spotlight: NRA-ILA Fighting the Bloomberg Money In Virginia 2019 Elections

The Nov. 5th election may be the most consequential ever for our Second Amendment rights in the Commonwealth. That’s because every seat in the Virginia House of Delegates and Senate is up for grabs and gun control ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.