NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging SCOTUS to Invalidate Hawaii Carry Restriction

Today, the National Rifle Association and the Independence Institute filed an amicus brief in Wolford v. Lopez, a case before the U.S. Supreme Court challenging Hawaii’s law that forbids carrying on private property open to the public—such as restaurants, gas stations, and grocery stores—without the property owner’s express consent.

Following the NRA’s landmark victory in NYSRPA v. Bruen, which confirmed that all Americans have a right to carry firearms in public, six states enacted laws requiring concealed-carry permitholders to obtain permission before entering publicly accessible private property. The Second Circuit struck down New York’s version, and the Third Circuit struck down New Jersey’s in an NRA case, but the Ninth Circuit upheld Hawaii’s law. When the challengers to Hawaii’s law petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case, the NRA filed an amicus brief urging the Court to grant the petition, and the Court did.

Our brief filed today provides extensive historical evidence showing that early Americans routinely carried arms onto privately owned property open to the public, and that no historical tradition supports Hawaii’s restriction. It also presents data showing that concealed-carry permitholders are extraordinarily law-abiding and undeserving of the invidious prejudice reflected in Hawaii’s law.

Please stay tuned to www.nraila.org for future updates on NRA-ILA’s ongoing efforts to defend your constitutional rights, and please visit www.nraila.org/litigation to keep up to date on NRA-ILA’s ongoing litigation efforts.