Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

The Latest Lurch in Canada’s Gun Grab: Test Run Nets “Less than 30” Guns

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

The Latest Lurch in Canada’s Gun Grab: Test Run Nets “Less than 30” Guns

In a tacit acknowledgement of just how unworkable its gun ban and confiscation program is, Canada’s Liberal government quietly extended the gun amnesty for an additional year, just before it was due to expire on October 30 – the third time (so far) that the date has been pushed forward. 

In another potential indicator of defeat, a veil of secrecy has apparently been drawn over the outcome of the pilot project in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, where the first rollout of the gun confiscation scheme against individual firearm owners occurred. Public Safety Canada, the department with overall responsibility for implementing the gun ban and confiscation, announced the pilot project would run for a two-week period ending on October 15. Further, “[o]nly the first 200 eligible firearms will be accepted for compensation” during the test run, arguably a perverse limitation given the firearms have been banned, as the Liberal government has incessantly maintained, because they are far too dangerous for civilian possession and use.

The objective of the pilot was to “test the online portal, the collection and destruction process, as well as the system for issuing compensation payments to participants,” but there’s been no official word on how this worked or statistics on how many guns were turned in. The Canadian Shooting Sports Association (CSSA) states, based on uncorroborated information, that the 200-gun limit was wildly off-target as “less than 30” guns were surrendered.

If this is accurate, what makes the under-30-guns total particularly unimpressive is that the pilot took place under the most favorable set-up possible: the Cape Breton Regional Police Chief is the brother-in-law of the Liberal Member of Parliament (MP) representing the district (prompting a Conservative MP to snark, “Will the Liberals now admit that the only way they can get police forces to participate [in the gun grab] is to hire their family?”). Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree (who has his own spectacularly embarrassing disclosures on the gun confiscation scheme) was compelled to deny that neither the political nor family relationship had anything to do with Cape Breton’s selection as Ground Zero of the individual confiscation phase. 

The expectation of an amnesty extension, being another year without criminal liability for possession, may have kept Cape Breton’s gun owners from parting with their lawfully acquired property. The government’s outline of how to submit a claim, though, could have been at least as strong a disincentive, operating on what appeared to be a “disposal first, payment maybe later” basis. As part of the initial screening, gun owners were required to “select a disposal option” (turn the gun in at a scheduled appointment with the local police, or have the gun permanently deactivated by “a business authorized to perform deactivations”), submit their claim, and wait to see whether they had been “approved to proceed.” Only after this approval had been received could the owner provide their banking information for the compensation to be paid. “Submitting a claim does not guarantee compensation,” but by that point, the gun owner who has followed all of the necessary steps may be left without compensation or a firearm.  

Responsible gun owners are not the only ones getting defrauded. All of Canada’s taxpayers are funding the gun ban and grab and paying the price for police resources being diverted away from real crimes. 

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government released its budget last week and the news isn’t good. Revenues are down from last year, government spending is up by almost $40 billion, and the deficit for 2025/2026 is more than double the figure that the government projected. One obvious cost-cutting measure that the government could have opted for but didn’t was to drop the gun ban and confiscation program, citing a face-saving argument of cutting government waste and unnecessary spending. Instead, Carney’s government has doubled down, allocating a reported $38.7 million more over three years to fund gun grab program.

Taxpayers still have no clear notion of the ultimate price tag. The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF), a group that has vocally and consistently called out the ban and confiscation program as a pointless squandering of public money, reportedly filed an access to information request in July 2023 with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) for a breakdown of all projected costs associated with confiscating the banned firearms. Gage Haubrich, the CTF’s Prairie director, states the agency provided a partial answer. It would cost the Pacific Region RCMP $12.6 million to confiscate and destroy banned firearms in that region, but that was the extent of the response. The CTF followed up with a complaint to the federal commissioner responsible for compliance in April 2024 and “the complaint has essentially gone nowhere.” Accordingly, the CTF is “going to court to compel the information commission to do its job and issue a decision on the CTF’s complaint and release the information.”

What has been obvious from the start is that banning the guns of legal consumers would do nothing to enhance public safety. Despite adopting the most extreme gun control laws Canada has ever seen, the Carney-Trudeau Liberals have unleashed a “crime wave” instead, as a statement by Canada’s Conservative Party explains. In less than a decade, the “rate of firearm-related violent crime has surged 29 percent while the number of victims has grown by nearly 19 percent;” violent crime “has skyrocketed by 50 percent, and total incidents of violent gun crime use ha[ve] surged 116 percent.”   

The Cape Breton pilot is representative of the chaotic Liberal gun control saga as a whole, yet Canadians are expected to believe that crime is down, the mandatory confiscation law is a really a “voluntary buyback,” and that the bedevilled attempts to implement the gun ban and confiscation are, in the words of Minister Anandasangaree, “not targeting law-abiding gun owners as criminals for being in possession of prohibited firearms” but “about ensuring the safety and security of Canadians.” It’s time for an honest reckoning and an end to this epic government failure.

TRENDING NOW
Arizona: Anti-Gun Lawmakers Waste No Time Taking Aim at Second Amendment Rights

Friday, November 6, 2026

Arizona: Anti-Gun Lawmakers Waste No Time Taking Aim at Second Amendment Rights

Just hours after Election Day, anti-gun lawmakers in Arizona are already signaling plans to pursue gun control in 2027, leaving law-abiding Arizonans to face the harsh reality that a consequential legislative session lies ahead.  

The Election is Over: Now the Real Work Begins

News  

Wednesday, November 4, 2026

The Election is Over: Now the Real Work Begins

While the complete picture from the 2026 midterm elections is still emerging, the results, to say the least, were not what gun owners wanted. Anti-gun forces took control of the U.S. Senate and House of ...

U.S. House Passes Repeal of Social Security Administration Gun Grab, Begins Rolling Back Obama Era Executive Gun Control

News  

Friday, February 3, 2017

U.S. House Passes Repeal of Social Security Administration Gun Grab, Begins Rolling Back Obama Era Executive Gun Control

On Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives issued a strong statement in support of the Second Amendment by passing H.J. Res. 40, which would repeal Barack Obama’s scandalous attempt to grab guns from thousands of vulnerable, ...

Article by NRA-ILA Litigation Director Joseph Greenlee and Professor George Mocsary Published in Yale Law Journal Forum

News  

Monday, November 2, 2026

Article by NRA-ILA Litigation Director Joseph Greenlee and Professor George Mocsary Published in Yale Law Journal Forum

A new Essay authored by NRA-ILA Litigation Director Joseph Greenlee and University of Wyoming College of Law Professor George Mocsary has been published in the Yale Law Journal Forum.

New York:  Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

On Wednesday, May 27, Gov. Kathy Hochul signed S.9005C, which “enacts into law major components” of the state’s public protection and general government budget.

Trump’s Gun Rights Policies Making America Safe Again

News  

Monday, November 2, 2026

Trump’s Gun Rights Policies Making America Safe Again

“Crime’s way down thanks to Trump — Dems will fight to send it back up,” warns an editorial in the N.Y. Post. “Law-and-order works. Immigration enforcement works. And — like it or not — Trump’s ...

The Hunting Vote: What’s at Stake in 2026 and Beyond

News  

Monday, November 2, 2026

The Hunting Vote: What’s at Stake in 2026 and Beyond

As votes are now being cast nationwide, one influential voting bloc is drawing renewed attention: America's hunters, sportsmen, and sportswomen.

The NFA’s New Era: What Has Changed, What Remains the Same, Items of Note

News  

Monday, October 12, 2026

The NFA’s New Era: What Has Changed, What Remains the Same, Items of Note

As we announced separately this week, ATF has determined that it will use its executive discretion to uniformly suspend enforcement of large portions of the National Firearms Act (NFA).

District Court Declines to Enter Agreement to Invalidate Florida’s Waiting Period Law in NRA Case and Invites Amici Participation

Thursday, October 29, 2026

District Court Declines to Enter Agreement to Invalidate Florida’s Waiting Period Law in NRA Case and Invites Amici Participation

Yesterday, U.S. District Judge Steven D. Merryday denied the parties’ joint motion for entry of judgment in the National Rifle Association’s challenge to Florida’s firearm waiting period law. The case, Dunn v. Glass, remains pending ...

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Pennsylvania’s Carry Restrictions for Adults Under 21

Friday, October 30, 2026

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Pennsylvania’s Carry Restrictions for Adults Under 21

Today, the National Rifle Association, Firearms Policy Coalition, and an individual, Daniel Maines, filed a lawsuit challenging Pennsylvania’s carry restrictions for adults under 21.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.