Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Biden’s FBI Boasts About its Young Adult Waiting Period

Monday, April 1, 2024

Biden’s FBI Boasts About its Young Adult Waiting Period

When it comes to law-abiding adults ages 18-20, the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) should be renamed the Never Instant Criminal Background Check System. An article posted to the FBI’s website on March 25 shows how the agency uses the ill-named Bipartisan Safer Communities Act of 2022 (BSCA) to impose a waiting period on young adult gun buyers.

Under the BSCA, when a Federal Firearms Licensee (gun dealer or FFL) contacts NICS to run a background check on a purchaser under the age of 21, NICS is required to contact additional state and local government agencies in the prospective purchaser’s jurisdiction before approving the firearm transfer. This includes the state agency responsible for juvenile criminal justice records, the state custodian of mental health records, and the “local law enforcement agency of the jurisdiction in which the person resides.”

These queries take time. Further, unlike NICS, these state and local agencies are not necessarily designed or equipped to handle these types of requests in an instant or even timely fashion. In fact, as made clear in the U.S. Supreme Court case Printz v. U.S. (1997), the federal government cannot compel the states to participate in its gun control regime at all. Therefore, no law-abiding 18-20-year-old adult experiences an instant background check.

Prior to the enactment of the BSCA, in cases where the NICS system flagged an individual as possibly having a prohibiting record, the FBI had 3-business days to determine whether the person was in fact prohibited before the firearm transfer was allowed to proceed. In the case of young adults ages 18-20, the BSCA demands that NICS extend the 3-business day check period to 10 business days (two full weeks) if “cause exists to further investigate a possibly disqualifying juvenile record.” The requisite “cause” to prompt the 10-business day waiting period is not defined by the legislation.

NRA-ILA warned gun owners and policymakers back in 2022 that the BSCA eliminated instant background checks for young adults and would be used by the Biden administration to create a waiting period regime. Despite the obvious implications of the bill, proponents of the BSCA claimed the gun control measure “does not create any mandatory waiting periods.”

According to the FBI, since the BSCA took effect over 200,000 young adults have been encumbered by the never-instant checks. The agency stated that the average waiting period for a law-abiding young adult to be cleared by the never-instant check is “about 4 days.”

Recall, the new under-21 background check procedure sends NICS on an open-ended fishing expedition for potentially prohibiting records – even when they don’t exist. Therefore, perversely, the system is quicker to deny gun purchasers - “about 2 days” – than to allow a lawful firearm transaction to proceed.

Aside from the waiting period, the BSCA background check scheme poses another threat to gun owners.

Federal law (18 USC 922) prohibits firearm possession by a person who “has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.” Note the term “convicted.” Under a proper interpretation of federal law, many juvenile adjudications may not meet the criteria for a federal firearms prohibition.

As explained on a government website that describes the features of the juvenile justice system, the “process operates according to the premise that youth are fundamentally different from adults, both in terms of level of responsibility and potential for rehabilitation.” The juvenile system is typically more informal and less focused on procedural due process than the adult criminal justice system. Most states do not consider adjudications of delinquency in the same category as criminal convictions.

Of course, juvenile misbehavior varies in degrees. In most states, very serious behavior – homicides or assaults resulting in serious physical injury, for example – can lead to a juvenile being prosecuted in the adult criminal justice system, with all the usual consequences that implies.

Demanding federal bureaucrats delve into juvenile records that aren’t necessarily prohibiting under a proper interpretation of 18 USC 922 is an invitation to improperly delay or deny an individual’s Second Amendment rights.

As members of the political community, young adults ages 18-20 should have their right to keep and bear arms respected in the same manner as older adults. NRA-ILA will continue to work towards this goal.

TRENDING NOW
U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Narrows Scope of Unlawful Drug User Prohibition

News  

Monday, June 22, 2026

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Narrows Scope of Unlawful Drug User Prohibition

On June 18, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion which unanimously narrowed the scope of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which bans firearm acquisition or possession by anyone who is an “unlawful user” of a ...

Anti-Gun Municipalities Double-Down When Policies Are Challenged

News  

Monday, June 22, 2026

Anti-Gun Municipalities Double-Down When Policies Are Challenged

Why is it that, after being told their gun laws are unconstitutional, so many areas under control of anti-gun extremists seem to respond with something along the lines of, “Oh yeah?  Watch what we do next!” 

Canadian Criminologist: “Almost All of the U.S. is Safer than Toronto”

News  

Monday, June 15, 2026

Canadian Criminologist: “Almost All of the U.S. is Safer than Toronto”

Canada’s Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney recently defended his government’s gun confiscation and “buyback” program, stating the government “has acted swiftly and decisively to combat gun crime” by removing “prohibited assault-style firearms from communities across ...

New York’s Penn Station: “Sensitive Place” or a “Disgusting” “Hellhole”?

News  

Monday, June 15, 2026

New York’s Penn Station: “Sensitive Place” or a “Disgusting” “Hellhole”?

Another week, another grotesque act of violence in one of New York’s least sensitive places.

California: Anti-Gun Bills Advance, More Scheduled Next Week

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

California: Anti-Gun Bills Advance, More Scheduled Next Week

Anti-gun legislation continues advancing in Sacramento. This week, the Senate Public Safety Committee advanced Assembly Bills 1743 and 1753, while postponing consideration of AB 1810, the FFL Killer Bill, until June 23. On that same ...

New York:  Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul Signs Gun Ban in State Budget Process

On Wednesday, May 27, Gov. Kathy Hochul signed S.9005C, which “enacts into law major components” of the state’s public protection and general government budget.

Up Next for DOJ’s Second Amendment Section: Philadelphia

News  

Monday, June 15, 2026

Up Next for DOJ’s Second Amendment Section: Philadelphia

Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), has been doing yeoman’s work in the defense of the Second Amendment.

Credibility Crisis Facing Violence Interruption Programs Continues

News  

Monday, June 15, 2026

Credibility Crisis Facing Violence Interruption Programs Continues

Few things expose the hypocrisy of anti-gun activists and their allies more clearly than the recurring spectacle of so-called “violence interrupters” and their own violent tendencies. The story has become repetitive but worth reiterating because ...

Massachusetts: Sunday Hunting Back on the Table, TAKE ACTION NOW!

Thursday, June 18, 2026

Massachusetts: Sunday Hunting Back on the Table, TAKE ACTION NOW!

Yesterday, after immense pressure from sportsmen and women across the state, the provisions regarding Sunday hunting, crossbow hunting, and archery setbacks that were stripped from the House budget were added back to a bond bill. 

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Michigan’s License-to-Purchase Regime

Monday, June 15, 2026

NRA Files Lawsuit Challenging Michigan’s License-to-Purchase Regime

The National Rifle Association, Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners, Michigan Gun Owners, Michigan Open Carry, and four NRA members filed a lawsuit challenging Michigan’s firearm license-to-purchase and registration regime.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.