Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Justice Kavanaugh

Monday, November 19, 2018

Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh. Sounds pretty good, doesn’t it?

But the journey from nomination to confirmation was anything but good. In fact, it was an embarrassing spectacle.

America watched in shock as the left did everything it could to tear down an honorable man with a stellar judicial track record spanning more than a decade on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

In the end, though, Brett Kavanaugh was successfully confirmed on October 6.

Had the Kavanaugh confirmation been completely derailed, the Supreme Court would have remained with only eight justices until a new nominee could be confirmed. And those eight justices are evenly split when it comes to the Second Amendment. In other words, four respect the original intent of our Founding Fathers and support our individual right to keep and bear arms, while the other four support virtually unfettered restrictions on law-abiding gun owners.

Without Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation, Second Amendment-related cases heard by the Supreme Court would have likely received a 4-4 split decision, leaving intact previous rulings. Thus, an anti-Second Amendment ruling handed down by a lower court would remain in effect in the jurisdiction covered by that court.

Because many firearm-related cases could soon be taken up by the Supreme Court, Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation came not a moment too soon.

One such case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v. City of New York, challenges the constitutionality of Title 38 of the Rules of the City of New York.  The suit states that the rules infringe upon the Second Amendment by denying the right to possess and carry a firearm for personal defense, as well as by prohibiting residents from practicing at a firearms range or participating in shooting events located outside the borders of the City of New York. The rules were upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit earlier this year, and an appeal to the Supreme Court has been filed.

Another important case, Rogers v. Grewal, challenges New Jersey’s “may issue”carry permit system, which requires permit applicants to show a “justifiable need”before they will be issued a permit to carry a concealed firearm. Rogers argued the “justifiable need”standard for carry permits was declared unconstitutional in Wrenn v. District of Columbia in 2017, so New Jersey’s standard should also be held as unconstitutional.

Wrenn, however, was decided in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and New Jersey falls under the purview of the Third Circuit. The Rogers case was dismissed due to the precedent in another case ruled on by the Third Circuit in 2013, Drake v. Filko, where the court held that the “justifiable need”standard was found to be constitutional. Rogers is on appeal to the Supreme Court, which will hopefully take up the case due to the conflicting rulings at the circuit court level.

Finally, there is Worman v. Baker, which challenges the constitutionality of the Massachusetts law that bans countless semiautomatic rifles and standard-capacity magazines. A federal judge has already ruled against the challenge, using a tortured misreading of the landmark Heller case, and the case could very well make it to the Supreme Court next year.

During his confirmation hearing, Justice Kavanaugh had an exchange with anti-gun Senator Dianne Feinstein that made clear just how important it was to the pro-gun community that he ascend to the Supreme Court. Feinstein questioned Kavanaugh’s dissent in a case that upheld a D.C. “assault weapon”ban, where he argued that such firearms are“in common use”and therefore protected under the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment precedent in Heller.

Feinstein made the ridiculous claim that “assault weapons” may be commonly owned but are not in common use. Judge Kavanaugh calmly pointed out that so-called “assault weapons”are, in fact, in common use,explaining that they are in the homes of millions of law-abiding Americans and there is no legal distinction between ownership and use.

It is because of such views that NRA, and all law-abiding gun owners, needed Justice Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. We should all be thankful he was willing to endure the unprecedented personal smear campaign launched against him by those who will clearly do anything in order to oppose our constitutional freedoms.

IN THIS ARTICLE
Brett Kavanaugh
TRENDING NOW
NASCAR Takes a Hard Left

News  

Friday, August 30, 2019

NASCAR Takes a Hard Left

After decades of NASCAR drivers literally turning left for hours every race day (road course races excluded, of course), the governing body appears to be taking a figurative left turn, politically. K-Var, a retailer in outdoor and ...

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Declares NRA a “Domestic Terrorist Organization”

News  

Sunday, September 8, 2019

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Declares NRA a “Domestic Terrorist Organization”

On September 3, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution, “declaring that the National Rifle Association is a domestic terrorist organization and urging other cities, states, and the federal government to do the same.”The resolution was ...

California: Anti-Gun Bills Sent to Governor

Wednesday, September 11, 2019

California: Anti-Gun Bills Sent to Governor

Earlier this week, the California Legislature cast final votes on AB 12, AB 61, AB 879, AB 1254, AB 1297, and AB 1669, which will now move to Governor Newsom's desk for his consideration.  

“Pro-gun” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Turns on Second Amendment Supporters, Sides With Anti-Gun Lobby

News  

Sunday, September 8, 2019

“Pro-gun” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Turns on Second Amendment Supporters, Sides With Anti-Gun Lobby

Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick uses his political website to claim he is “leading the fight for life and liberty in Texas, including … standing up for the Second Amendment.” He also proudly notes his prior NRA endorsement. But ...

News  

Friday, September 13, 2019

NRA Statement on Texas Governor's Safety Action Report

The National Rifle Association released the following statement on Friday regarding Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's Texas Safety Action Report:   

California Mayor to Tax Law-abiding Gun Owners for the Actions of Criminals

News  

Friday, August 30, 2019

California Mayor to Tax Law-abiding Gun Owners for the Actions of Criminals

This week, San Jose, Calif. Mayor Sam Liccardo took to the pages of the Washington Post to tout a plan to require law-abiding gun owners in his city to purchase firearms insurance. Under the Liccardo proposal, firearms owners ...

Thursday, September 5, 2019

Florida Alert! Are You Ready For Gun Registration?

A Constitutional Amendment calling for an "assault weapons" ban is being proposed for the ballot in 2020.  The definition of "assault weapon," in the amendment, includes ALL semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.  If the amendment goes on the ballot ...

Groovy: Former NY Times Editor Wants to Return to 1960 Gun Laws

News  

Sunday, September 8, 2019

Groovy: Former NY Times Editor Wants to Return to 1960 Gun Laws

Proving once again that ignorance is no bar to publication in the U.S. legacy press, former executive editor of the New York Times Howell Raines has offered his inane take on the current gun control ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Marching Toward Gun Confiscation: Prohibition Advocates Released Unhinged Gun Control Plan

News  

Monday, August 26, 2019

Marching Toward Gun Confiscation: Prohibition Advocates Released Unhinged Gun Control Plan

This week, March for Our Lives – the gun control group that arose in the wake of the criminal mass attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla. – released a lengthy plan ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.