Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

Seattle’s Tax on Gun Retailers – A Gun Control “Bait and Switch”

Friday, June 30, 2017

Seattle’s Tax on Gun Retailers – A Gun Control “Bait and Switch”

In the world of retail sales, “bait and switch” refers to a marketing tactic in which one item or product (the bait) is attractively advertised in order to get interested customers to commit to a different product (the switch).     

In 2015, Seattle, Washington, in a unanimous vote by its City Council, passed Ordinance 124833, creating a new Firearms and Ammunition Tax Fund. Starting January 1, 2016, the ordinance imposed a “gun violence tax” of $25 on each firearm sold at retail, and between two and five cents per round on all retail sales of ammunition. 

Council members, explaining their support of the ordinance, stated that the City “can and must pursue innovative gun safety measures that save lives and save money;” “making it more difficult to assess guns and ammunition will save more lives;” and that “guns are getting into the wrong hands… [this] has all to do with making sure our neighborhoods are safe.” They estimated that the ordinance would generate revenue of between $300,000 and $500,000 annually, placed in a dedicated fund for “gun violence prevention programs and research.” Gun owners themselves wouldn’t be taxed because the ordinance applied only to retailers, although at the same time the City noted that affected retailers had the choice of passing the tax on to their customers. 

In the 18 months since the ordinance went into effect, it’s possible to assess its impact and draw some preliminary conclusions. 

Seattle’s gun retailers predicted the new tax would drive them out of business or out of the city. One dealer, Precise Shooter, calculated that the tax would cost more than the profits it earned on the taxed gun and ammunition sales, so it pulled up stakes and relocated outside of Seattle. Another business – the only remaining large-scale gun retailer in Seattle – had lost approximately $2M in revenue in the first 11 months and laid off employees in the face of declining sales. These events, unfortunately, don’t comport with the City’s claim that “in light of the success of the firearms industry today, a $25 per firearm tax is not going to affect the sales of firearms.” 

The reality regarding the projected revenue stream appears at odds with expectations as well. There is some indication that the tax generated less than $200,000 in 2016, well below the $300,000 minimum annual amount cited in City documents. How much the actual figure deviates from the official minimum, though, can’t be confirmed because Seattle officials have consistently declined to make this information available, so much so that interested parties have been obliged to file a lawsuit under the Public Records Act seeking to compel the disclosure of the aggregate revenue data. In addition to this shortfall in the theoretical or anticipated tax receipts, the ordinance is responsible for actual revenue losses (sales tax, licensing) caused when local gun businesses, and consumer spending on guns and ammunition, shifted to outside the city.

Contrary to the public safety rationale used to justify this tax, there’s been no reduction in shooting crimes since its enactment. Seattle Police Department (SPD) statistics (“Seastat”) include a “Shots Fired Dashboard” comparing year-to-date statistics for two categories, “shootings” (firearm-related incidents that resulted in injury or death but excluding self-inflicted or officer-involved shootings) and “shots fired” (injury and non-injury firearm-related incidents). The most recently available Seastat data (June 7, 2017) shows a significant increase in both categories. The 2017 year-to-date “shootings” number (37) is almost 50 percent higher than that in 2016 (25); the “shots fired” listed for 2017 not only exceeds the 2016 amount but is the highest ever over the last six years. The number of aggravated assaults and homicides involving firearms increased in 2017 over the same period last year, and police sources confirm that rising conflict between criminal gangs is responsible for the majority of the people shot this year in Seattle. 

Seattle’s taxpayers surely have cause to believe that their elected representatives had overhyped or oversold this ordinance. The “gun violence tax” hasn’t made city streets any safer or produced even the minimum in projected annual revenue – and the research that was supposed to be paid for by the tax is instead apparently being funded, to the tune of over half a million dollars, out of the City’s general revenue fund. One category of legitimate retail business has disappeared from the City almost entirely, making it more difficult for residents to exercise their basic constitutional right to purchase guns and ammunition.

On a broader level, this episode illustrates, yet again, the gun control “bait and switch” – the gap between what gun control proponents pledge their touted measures will accomplish and the different and often perverse results that actually occur. The enactment of Seattle’s “gun violence tax” has been followed by more violent crime, and instead of the special tax fund, all taxpayers are reportedly footing the bill for the gun violence program.

So the next time you’re being asked to buy in on something labeled as a “common sense” or “responsible” gun law, there’s another useful retail term that applies – caveat emptor.

TRENDING NOW
Court to Texas College Professors: Your Irrational Fear of Gun Owners Is Not Legally Addressable

News  

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Court to Texas College Professors: Your Irrational Fear of Gun Owners Is Not Legally Addressable

Last Thursday, a federal judge in Austin, Texas, dismissed a lawsuit by several professors who sought to block the University of Texas from implementing a state law that provides for the lawful carrying of concealed ...

California: Anti-Gun Bills to be Heard in Assembly Appropriations Committee on Wednesday, July 19

Monday, July 17, 2017

California: Anti-Gun Bills to be Heard in Assembly Appropriations Committee on Wednesday, July 19

On Wednesday, July 19, anti-gun bills SB 464 and SB 497 are scheduled to be heard in the Assembly Appropriations Committee at 9AM in State Capitol room 4202.  Assembly Bill 424 remains eligible for third ...

CMP Sales of 1911s One Step Closer With House Passage of 2018 NDAA

Friday, July 14, 2017

CMP Sales of 1911s One Step Closer With House Passage of 2018 NDAA

On Friday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 2810, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2018. Included in the bill is a provision that would make U.S. Army surplus 1911 .45 ACP ...

The Danger Of A “Not In My Backyard” Mentality On Shooting Ranges

News  

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

The Danger Of A “Not In My Backyard” Mentality On Shooting Ranges

Muscatine County, Iowa, is home to about 40,000 people, and like too many places around the country, gun owners there have no public range where they can practice or compete safely. That may be changing, ...

Gun Control Groups: Good at Gloating, Bad at Counting on Advancing National Reciprocity Effort

Friday, July 14, 2017

Gun Control Groups: Good at Gloating, Bad at Counting on Advancing National Reciprocity Effort

Apparently, Michael Bloomberg is good at counting money but not so good at counting votes. This week, Breitbart reported that Everytown for Gun Safety, Michael Bloomberg’s gun ban conglomerate, was claiming a “win” for congressional ...

Run, Hide, Perish – Survival Do’s and Don’ts from Across the Pond

News  

Friday, July 14, 2017

Run, Hide, Perish – Survival Do’s and Don’ts from Across the Pond

The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) advises persons at risk of harm from an active shooter to “Run, Hide, Fight” (in that order), recommending “fight” – incapacitating or “attempt[ing] to take the active ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

California: DOJ Releases Proposed Regulations Regarding Ammunition Vendor Licensing

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

California: DOJ Releases Proposed Regulations Regarding Ammunition Vendor Licensing

On Friday, July 14th, the California Department of Justice, Bureau of Firearms (“DOJ”) claims to have released its anticipated proposed regulations for the issuance of ammunition vendor licenses.  Under the Administrative Procedure Act, a government ...

Commerce Subcommittee Chairman John Culberson Steers Pro-Gun Spending Bill to House Floor

Friday, July 14, 2017

Commerce Subcommittee Chairman John Culberson Steers Pro-Gun Spending Bill to House Floor

On Thursday, the House Committee on Appropriations approved the Fiscal Year 2018 Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) Appropriations Bill, which funds various federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice, for the next year. The bill ...

California: Help Save Cordova Shooting Center

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

California: Help Save Cordova Shooting Center

Tomorrow, July 19, the Cordova Recreation and Park District (CRPD) Board of Directors are scheduled to vote on the future of the Cordova Shooting Center. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.