Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

Setting the Record Straight on Oklahoma's Proposed "Right to Keep and Bear Arms" Constitutional Amendment

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Setting the Record Straight on Oklahoma's Proposed "Right to Keep and Bear Arms" Constitutional Amendment

What is House Joint Resolution 1009?

HJR 1009 proposes an amendment to the "keep and bear arms" language in the Oklahoma Bill of Rights, part of the State Constitution. HJR 1009 is necessary because the Oklahoma courts have interpreted the current "keep and bear arms" language as

  • not protecting the right to personal defense;
  • not protecting arms useful for self-defense;
  • and not protecting a person’s right to lawfully keep and bear arms for self-defense on his or her own property.
     

HJR 1009 would RESTORE these protections for the right to keep and bear arms. Other states have adopted similar amendments to their constitutions.

Opponents of this legislation are spreading scare tactics about it, leading Oklahomans to believe it will lead to a “wild west” scenario.

Below are their claims, countered by the facts.

NRA Fact Checker

CLAIM: HJR 1009 would jeopardize the rights of businesses to keep guns from being carried onto the businesses’ private property.

FACT: HJR 1009 would NOT jeopardize the ability of private businesses to adopt policies about guns because the specific and clear language of the amendment applies to state government action and any government restrictions.

HJR 1009 would not change the ability of a private entity to prohibit persons from carrying on the business premises.

CLAIM: HJR 1009 would jeopardize the rights of event hosts at public parks, recreational areas and fairgrounds to prohibit weapons at their events.

FACT: No such “right” respecting these public places currently exists in state law. Oklahoma law specifically excludes public property designated as a park, recreational area, or fairgrounds from the places in which carrying a handgun is prohibited.

Current Oklahoma law prohibits “any person in control of” any such place from establishing “any policy or rule that has the effect of prohibiting any person in lawful possession of a handgun license from possession of a handgun” in these places.

Changes are pending to this law but these still won’t authorize event hosts to ban guns at all public parks, fairgrounds, and recreational areas.

CLAIM: HJR 1009 would jeopardize the current ability of colleges to prohibit guns on campus.

FACT: Oklahoma law does not impose a universal ban on guns on campuses. Additionally, Oklahoma law actually RESTRICTS the ability of a college or university to regulate and prohibit guns on campus.

A person with a valid handgun license may carry upon the premises of any college or university with the written consent of the college or university or center, or where a policy of the college or university or center allows carrying.

Nothing in the amendment limits the authority of any college or university to take disciplinary action against a student for a violation of a student code of conduct.

CLAIM: HJR 1009 would lessen the ability of law enforcement to protect public safety.

FACT: HJR 1009 does NOT restrict legitimate law enforcement activities. HJR 1009 expressly refers only to the right to keep and bears arms “for any legitimate purpose.” It specifically allows restrictions to prohibit the possession of guns by convicted felons and persons who have been found to be mentally incompetent or seriously mentally ill.

Background Information:

  • Violent crime remains a problem in America, and police are not always able to respond in a timely way. According to the recent U.S. Department of Justice study, National Crime Victimization Survey (2014), during 2014, three million people experienced at least one violent victimization, 1.2 million people experienced at least one serious violent victimization, and 8% of all households experienced one or more property victimizations. As noted in a recent Oklahoma news story, it can “take up to half an hour to get a police officer to respond to a call.” (News9.com, Crescent Residents Upset About Police Response Times, March 25, 2016, at http://www.news9.com/story/31569999/crescent-residents-upset-about-police-response-times).
  • Restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms deprive the law-abiding of their ability to protect themselves and others with a firearm.  
  • Since 1991, when the nation’s total violent crime rate hit an all-time high, 26 states have adopted Right-to-Carry laws, and the violent crime rate has declined by more than half, to a 43-year low, and the murder rate has declined to an all-time low.
  • Criminals are less likely to target someone who may be armed.
      
TRENDING NOW
Kentucky: Committee to Consider Firearm Seizures Without Due Process

Friday, November 15, 2019

Kentucky: Committee to Consider Firearm Seizures Without Due Process

On Friday, November 22nd, the Kentucky state Interim Joint Committee on Judiciary will consider so called “red-flag laws.” Though no legislation has been introduced, such laws usually allow for Second Amendment rights to be suspended ...

A New Candidate for Confiscator-in-Chief

News  

Monday, November 11, 2019

A New Candidate for Confiscator-in-Chief

Former Texas Congressman Robert Francis O’Rourke abandoned his run for President last week, once again leaving a void for the most strident anti-gun candidate seeking the Democrat nomination. Even before declaring his candidacy for President, ...

Strong Firearms Preemption Laws are More Important Than Ever

News  

Gun Laws  

Monday, November 11, 2019

Strong Firearms Preemption Laws are More Important Than Ever

Photo Courtesy of Jeremy Tremp In recent weeks, gun owners have been given two prime examples of just how important strong firearms preemption laws are to the vibrant exercise of Second Amendment rights. On October ...

National Hearing Conservation Association Supports Suppressors

News  

Monday, November 4, 2019

National Hearing Conservation Association Supports Suppressors

Photo Courtesy of Silencer Shop On October 28th, the National Hearing Conservation Association sent its new position paper on firearms suppressors to the American Suppressor Association. The paper, in short, recognizes the important role that ...

Wisconsin: Gov. Evers Calls for Firearm Confiscation & Criminalizing Private Transfers

Friday, September 20, 2019

Wisconsin: Gov. Evers Calls for Firearm Confiscation & Criminalizing Private Transfers

On September 19th, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers, Attorney General Josh Kaul, Representative Melissa Sargent (D-48), and Senator Lena Taylor (D-4) held a press conference calling on the Legislature to violate the Second Amendment by: 1) ...

New Hampshire: Firearm Seizure Bill Headed to House Floor

Thursday, October 31, 2019

New Hampshire: Firearm Seizure Bill Headed to House Floor

On October 30th, the New Hampshire state Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee sent House Bill 687 to the House floor for further consideration after a motion to kill the bill failed by a vote ...

News  

Friday, June 27, 2008

Heller: The Supreme Decision

Leaders of the National Rifle Association (NRA) praised the Supreme Court’s historic ruling overturning Washington, D.C.’s ban on handguns and on self-defense in the home, in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller.

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Bloomberg’s Gun Control Apparatus Lies to Virginia’s Firearm Owners in Election Mailing

News  

Monday, November 4, 2019

Bloomberg’s Gun Control Apparatus Lies to Virginia’s Firearm Owners in Election Mailing

Here’s a hint for Virginia gun owners and sportsmen: When you get a firearm-related election mailing with a New York City return address and proudly proclaiming that it’s printed on soy ink, you can safely ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.