In an apparent effort to regain California's place as the most restrictive gun control state in the Union, California Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom announced on Thursday that he would pursue several anti-gun initiatives for the 2016 ballot. These initiatives would ban and force surrender of common, standard-capacity magazines; require background checks for every ammunition sale; require prohibited persons to surrender their firearms; encourage greater sharing of information with federal law enforcement; and punish gun owners who fail to report lost or stolen firearms.
While the exact text of these proposals is not yet available, for those who closely follow California firearm legislation, many of these measures will look very familiar. Newsom’s proposed initiatives read like a laundry list of recent, failed California legislation.
Unsurprisingly, these proposals would only burden law-abiding Californians' right to defend themselves while doing little, if anything, to punish the criminal misuse of firearms or promote public safety. Similar proposals in other states have proven ineffective and even impossible to implement.
Newsom also seems unaware that point-of-sale ammunition restrictions were once required under federal law, but Congress eliminated the provisions under the advice of the then head of ATF, Stephen E. Higgins, who noted that the government had “recognized that the current recordkeeping requirements for ammunition have no substantial law enforcement value.” But, perhaps Newsom believes he is more informed on firearm policy than the former director of the federal agency charged with regulating firearms.
If Newsom were actually interested in addressing the criminal misuse of firearms rather than engaging in political grandstanding for the 2018 governor's race, he might be interested in looking at the negative effects of Prop. 47, which, among other things, reduced the penalties for firearm theft and possession of a stolen firearm. For someone claiming to seek solutions for "gun violence," addressing a main source for black market firearms would seemingly be a good place to start.
Newsom and his supporters will need nearly 366,000 signatures to get these measures on the 2016 ballot. If and when these proposals move forward, NRA will oppose them just as it opposed the misguided, failed legislation on which the proposals are based.
In California, No Amount of Gun-Control Will Ever be Enough
![Back to Top](/images/desktop_skin/global/back-to-top.gif)
Friday, October 16, 2015
![In California, No Amount of Gun-Control Will Ever be Enough](https://www.nraila.org/remote.axd?https://shared.nrapvf.org/sharedmedia/1508194/california-piles-on-the-gun-control.jpg?preset=article)
Friday, July 19, 2024
Progressive politicians in Massachusetts just passed one of the most extreme gun control bills in the country.
Monday, July 22, 2024
Last week, Sen. JD Vance (R-OH), accepted the Republican party’s nomination for vice president at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, WI.
Friday, February 2, 2024
On Thursday, February 1st, the Senate passed S.2572 late in the night without the bill ever receiving a public hearing, ignoring the concerns of Minority Leader Bruce Tarr and second amendment advocates across the state.
Monday, April 1, 2024
NRA Members Among the Largest Class Protected from Draconian Rule
Monday, July 22, 2024
The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) has filed a lawsuit challenging the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (ATF) “Engaged in the Business” Final Rule. The ATF’s Final Rule unlawfully redefines when a person ...
More Like This From Around The NRA
![](https://d2a8vbouk2yq1g.cloudfront.net/nra-realted-content/spinning-wheel.gif)