Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

Obama's "Unified Agenda" of Regulatory Objectives Causes Fear, Confusion

Friday, June 5, 2015

Obama's "Unified Agenda" of Regulatory Objectives Causes Fear, Confusion

The Internet has been buzzing this past week with stories of the Obama Administration's "Unified Agenda" on gun control. An article published in The Hill magazine, for example, sported the ominous headline, "Administration preps new gun regulations." It stated, "The regulations range from new restrictions on high-powered pistols to gun storage requirements. Chief among them is a renewed effort to keep guns out of the hands of people who are mentally unstable or have been convicted of domestic abuse."

"The regulations range from new restrictions on high-powered pistols to gun storage requirements. Chief among them is a renewed effort to keep guns out of the hands of people who are mentally unstable or have been convicted of domestic abuse."

While the president's desire to act unilaterally on gun control is a real and continuing threat to Second Amendment liberties, not everything in the Unified Agenda is new or even originated with the Obama Administration. As important as being aware of Obama's gun control aspirations are, it's also important to understand what the Unified Agenda is and is not.

The details of various proposals in the Unified Agenda are indeed alarming, but the collection itself is actually a welcome (and rare) bit of transparency from an administration that, despite its assertions to the contrary, can barely bring itself to answer Freedom of Information Act requests. As explained on the U.S. General Services Administration website, "Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions is a semiannual compilation of information about regulations under development by federal agencies, published in the spring and fall." Browsing the Unified Agenda can give Americans a better idea of what federal agencies are doing, plan to do, or have been trying to do but have not yet finished. The current edition, for example, covers hundreds of topics, with ongoing or recently completed actions by dozens of agencies.

A look at the "Arms and munitions" heading of the Unified Agenda is indeed enough to freeze the blood of any Second Amendment advocate. As The Hill and other media outlets have indicated, it includes subheadings such as "Secure gun storage" and "Pistol definition." Yet a closer look at the entries reveals several important points.

First, not all the proposed actions are new or even originated with the Obama Administration. To cite just one example, The Hill article mentions a proposed rule that "makes it illegal for some who ha[ve] been convicted of a misdemeanor domestic violence offense to own a gun." The law underlying this rule is the infamous Lautenberg Amendment" (SEC. 658) to the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, signed into law on September 30, 1996. That created a federal statute under which people convicted of a "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" are prohibited from acquiring or possessing firearms. On June 30, 1998, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, as it was then known, published a temporary rule that among other things added a definition of "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" (MCDV) to federal regulations. That definition incorporates various terms from the statutory definition itself.  The comment period for the temporary rule ended on September 28, 1998. According to the relevant notice in the Unified Agenda, "Final Action" on the interim rule is planned for November of this year. In the meantime, the statutory provision underlying the rule has been enforced all along.

What the final MCDV rule will look like, whether it will depart from the 17-year-old "temporary" rule, and whether the Administration will meet its November goal for final action are still to be determined. Nevertheless, this is not a case where the Obama Administration is creating a new restriction out of whole cloth. The law enacted in 1996, not the pending rule, is the ultimate basis of the prohibition. Time will tell, but this may be little more than a long-neglected case of bureaucratic housekeeping.

More recent proposals listed in the Unified Agenda, however, certainly do show the Obama Administration attempting to stretch underlying statutory law beyond its bounds to create broader restrictions.


This is the case with the entries listed as "Background checks for applicants making or transferring firearms" and "Mental disqualifications related to firearms purchase." In both instances,  your NRA was involved from day one in opposing the changes and submitted extensive comments (see here and here) to put BATFE on notice that its justifications for the proposals were flawed and inadequate. We also published alerts (see here, for example) encouraging others to comment, resulting in over 9,000 comments being submitted on the proposal relating to background checks for persons associated with NFA trusts. 

Indeed, NRA-ILA monitors the Federal Register every day for rulemaking activity that could affect the right to keep and bear arms and submits numerous comments every year on matters large and small. For example, see our accompanying article [hyperlink under "accompanying article"] on a State Department rulemaking that would have disastrous consequences, not just for the Second Amendment, but also for the First Amendment. Long before information is published in the Unified Agenda each spring and fall, your NRA has been monitoring, responding to, and reporting on it.

Also, some of the proposals that appear alarming at first blush are actually fairly routine bureaucratic matters that do not rise to the level of an emergency. For example, the "Secure gun storage" proposal, while not yet published for comment, does not relate to storage of personally owned firearms within homes, but concerns a BATFE proposal relating to information an applicant for a dealer's license would be required to provide. This arises from a 1998 law that requires applicants for federal firearm dealers' licenses to certify on the application "that secure gun storage or safety devices will be available at any place in which firearms are sold under the license to persons who are not licensees …."

Your NRA is in the process of submitting comments on the most consequential gun control items in the Unified Agenda.

Similarly, the item that The Hill claimed related to "high-powered pistols" actually concerned a 2005 proposal that primarily sought to address handguns designed to look like other items, including wallets or pens. Your NRA filed comments on the proposal at the time. More than ten years later, BATFE is now claiming they will finalize the rule in January 2016.

Your NRA is in the process of submitting comments on the most consequential gun control items in the Unified Agenda. We will report on these developments as they occur. A number of the Unified Agenda items have not yet been published for comment, but when they are, you can be sure that we will mobilize against, and ensure you're aware of, anything important and consequential.

Without a doubt, President Obama is making good on his promise to use his "phone" and his "pen" to circumvent Congress and the will of the American people. Whenever these actions affect the right of the people to keep and bear arms, however, you can be sure your NRA will be pushing back with the combined might of its millions of members and supporters.

TRENDING NOW
Justice Department Terminates and Repudiates Operation Chokepoint

News  

Friday, August 18, 2017

Justice Department Terminates and Repudiates Operation Chokepoint

Current Justice Department leadership and Boyd should be commended for their forceful statement on this matter. This unequivocal repudiation of Operation Chokepoint should make a return to such political persecution unpalatable for all but the ...

Oregon: Governor Signs Anti-Gun Bill into Law

Thursday, August 17, 2017

Oregon: Governor Signs Anti-Gun Bill into Law

Yesterday, Governor Kate Brown signed Senate Bill 719A.  Based on a California law enacted in 2014, SB 719A will create a so-called “Extreme Risk Protection Order” (ERPO) that could be obtained by a law enforcement ...

Washington: Department of Labor & Industries Targeting Shooting Ranges

Thursday, August 17, 2017

Washington: Department of Labor & Industries Targeting Shooting Ranges

At the request of Public Health, Seattle & King County, the Washington Department of Labor and Industries has released a “first draft” of a new statewide regulatory scheme targeting lead and lead exposure in the workplace. ...

American Bar Association Continues to Attack Gun Owners, Due Process

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, August 18, 2017

American Bar Association Continues to Attack Gun Owners, Due Process

The 2016 compilation of legislative policies of the ABA includes a raft of gun control proposals. In it, the ABA advocates for outmoded gun control measures, such as limits on the sale and possession of ...

Elizabeth Warren Urges Democrats to Champion Gun Control, Shut Down Debate

News  

Friday, August 18, 2017

Elizabeth Warren Urges Democrats to Champion Gun Control, Shut Down Debate

Just as many in the Democratic Party are seeking to moderate their message in order to once again compete as a national political party, some high-profile Democrats are urging the party to lurch further left ...

California: Ruling in NRA/CRPA Lawsuit Reigns in DOJ’s Misuse of DROS Fees

Friday, August 18, 2017

California: Ruling in NRA/CRPA Lawsuit Reigns in DOJ’s Misuse of DROS Fees

A California state court issued an important ruling in the NRA and CRPA supported case of Gentry v. Becerra, holding DOJ accountable for its historical mismanagement and misuse of DROS (dealer record of sale) account funds.

First, Carry No Gun: Police Chief Gets Inhospitable Reception at Texas Medical Clinic

News  

Friday, August 18, 2017

First, Carry No Gun: Police Chief Gets Inhospitable Reception at Texas Medical Clinic

We recently reported on claims that “gun safety advocates” in the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services have given a U.S. Marine Corps. veteran an untenable choice: custody of his grandson or his constitutional ...

Arizona Supreme Court Rebuffs Tucson’s Illegal Destruction of Firearms

News  

Thursday, August 17, 2017

Arizona Supreme Court Rebuffs Tucson’s Illegal Destruction of Firearms

On Thursday, the Arizona Supreme Court unanimously held that the state was within its authority to prohibit cities and counties from routinely destroying firearms obtained through forfeiture or as unclaimed property. State law holds that ...

Stossel Report Reinforces Urgent Need for Congressional Action

Second Amendment  

Gun Laws  

News  

Friday, August 11, 2017

Stossel Report Reinforces Urgent Need for Congressional Action

Award-winning journalist John Stossel published a report this week that provides a timely reminder that – nearly a decade after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller – law abiding gun ...

California: 2017 Legislative Session Reconvenes on Monday

Thursday, August 17, 2017

California: 2017 Legislative Session Reconvenes on Monday

On Monday, August 21, the California Legislature will reconvene from Summer recess.  Below is the status on the firearm-related bills still moving through the legislative process.  Please send an email to your state legislators respectfully urging ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.