Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

NRA Intervention Keeps The Trail Open For Overseas Travelers With Firearms

Monday, June 1, 2015

NRA Intervention Keeps The Trail Open For Overseas Travelers With Firearms

For a tense few weeks this spring, gun owners traveling overseas appeared to face a road to nowhere, thanks to an obscure firearm “export” rule hidden behind misleading notices in a sea of federal regulations. Ever vigilant, your National Rifle Association sprang into action to ensure the way remained open, and we will continue the effort to ensure it stays that way.

In 1788, James Madison warned of “laws … so voluminous that they cannot be read” and “so incoherent that they cannot be understood.” Those words rang true     in March, when the federal bureaucracy suddenly decided to enforce a rule change that had been on the books but ignored since May 2012.

Any firearm or ammunition that crosses the U.S. border becomes subject to a complex web of regulations and regulatory agencies. The primary law for outgoing rifles and handguns is the Arms Export Control Act, implemented by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). This falls under the jurisdiction of the State Department, which enforces ITARs registration and licensing requirements.

Nevertheless, an exemption has long applied for U.S. persons who temporarily export up to three firearms and 1,000 rounds of ammunition. This allows hunters, sportsmen and industry employees to travel overseas with firearms for legal purposes, subject to the laws of the destination countries. Previously, travelers simply visited a U.S. Customs office before departure, where they would provide information about their firearms on a form that was approved by a Customs official. Upon return to the United States, the traveler could use the form to verify prior stateside possession of the firearms.

In March 2011, however, an obscure notice in the Federal Register (which publishes proposed rule changes) mentioned that the State Department intended to “clarify” the existing exemption without changing its meaning by removing “certain extraneous language.” The next May, the change was formalized with another     notice that stated, “[W]hile the text is revised, the meaning [of the exemption] is not changed.” 

Those notices were false. The rule actually added a new layer of red tape for exempt travelers by requiring them to declare their “exports” and claim their exemptions through the Automated Export System (AES), a government database maintained by the Census Bureau. An informed reader of the Federal Register saw through the smokescreen and warned in a comment that AES was designed for commercial use and would not work for private individuals. That concern was dismissed by the State Department, which claimed in the final rule that it had “verified” that individuals could use    the system.

For almost three years, nothing was done to implement the revisions. That abruptly changed in March, when notices on the websites of CBP and Immigration and Customs Enforcement stating that AES registration was being strictly enforced were picked up and circulated online by hunters and travelers.

The result was bureaucratic chaos.

As it turns out, the State Department’s claim that “individuals” have access to AES is true only for people who are “sole proprietors” of businesses with employer identification numbers (EINS)from the IRS. According to the IRS, EINS are issued for business purposes, and applicants have to state a business reason for obtaining one. The Census Bureau, however, insists “an EIN can be obtained for government reporting purposes when a person does not own a business.” How should travelers resolve these contradictions? Very carefully, as providing false information to IRS or AES, as well as failing to comply with ITAR regulations, all carry potentially ruinous penalties.

These are only the beginning of a would-be traveler’s difficulties. The AES was designed with corporate compliance officers in mind, not private individuals. Registrants must negotiate a 34-page user guide and a 30-question qualification test to use the system, and obscure codes and data entry formats are mandatory. No assurances are provided, moreover, that information provided about personally owned firearms will be purged or                  kept confidential.

Fortunately, NRA quickly exposed the catch-22 facing travelers, and further enforcement of the AES requirement has been suspended. While this is just the latest “executive action” to target firearm owners, you can be sure that others will follow on the long road to 2016 … and with your help, we’ll be ready for them.

 

Chris W. Cox

BY Chris W. Cox

NRA-ILA Executive Director

Follow This Contributor

Chris W. Cox has served as the executive director of the Institute for Legislative Action, the political and lobbying arm of NRA, since 2002. As NRA’s principal political strategist, Cox oversees eight NRA-ILA divisions: Federal Affairs; State & Local Affairs; Public Affairs; Grassroots; Finance; Research & Information; Conservation, Wildlife & Natural Resources; and Office of Legislative Counsel. Cox also serves as chairman of NRA’s Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF), the Association’s political action committee; president of the NRA Freedom Action Foundation (NRA-FAF), which focuses on non-partisan voter registration and citizen education; and chairman of NRA Country, an effort to bring country music artists together with NRA members in support of our Second Amendment freedoms and hunting heritage.

TRENDING NOW
Maryland: House Passes Pro-Carry Legislation

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Maryland: House Passes Pro-Carry Legislation

Yesterday, the Maryland House of Delegates passed House Bill 1036 by a 97-41 vote.

Ohio: Critical Self-Defense Law Takes Effect Today!

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Ohio: Critical Self-Defense Law Takes Effect Today!

Today, March 21, the provisions of the critical self-defense legislation, Sub. Senate Bill 199, go into effect.  Thanks to your active involvement last session, this bill was signed by Governor Kasich last December.  This law ...

Illinois: Gun Seizure Bill Could be Heard by House at Any Time

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Illinois: Gun Seizure Bill Could be Heard by House at Any Time

The Illinois House of Representatives could consider House Bill 2354 at any time.

Arkansas Action Needed: Anti-Gun Bill Which Undermines Concealed Carry Headed to House

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Arkansas Action Needed: Anti-Gun Bill Which Undermines Concealed Carry Headed to House

Today, the Arkansas Senate passed Senate Bill 724, an anti-gun bill which undermines some of the key advancements made with the passage and enactment of House Bill 1249.  SB 724 is now headed to the ...

Oklahoma: Multiple Pro-Gun Bills Passed Out of the House

Friday, March 24, 2017

Oklahoma: Multiple Pro-Gun Bills Passed Out of the House

This week, the Oklahoma House of Representatives passed multiple pro-gun bills, including House Bill 1721, House Bill 2323, and House Bill 2322. 

Utah: Governor Signs Self-Defense Legislation into Law

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Utah: Governor Signs Self-Defense Legislation into Law

Tonight, Governor Gary Herbert signed House Bill 198 into law.

Maryland: Pro-Carry Legislation Pending Final Vote on House Floor

Monday, March 20, 2017

Maryland: Pro-Carry Legislation Pending Final Vote on House Floor

Today, the Maryland House of Delegates passed House Bill 1036 on second reading.

Nevada: Senate Passes Anti-Gun SB 115

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Nevada: Senate Passes Anti-Gun SB 115

Yesterday, March 21, the Senate passed anti-gun Senate Bill 115 with a 12-9 vote.  SB 115 was sent to the Assembly for further consideration.  Sponsored by state Senator Moises Denis (D-2), SB 115 would expand the list ...

Texas: Two Important Handgun Carry Bills to be Considered in Senate and House Next Week

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Texas: Two Important Handgun Carry Bills to be Considered in Senate and House Next Week

On Monday, March 27, the Texas Senate will convene after 2:00pm and is expected to take up and consider Senate Bill 16, NRA-backed legislation sponsored by State Sen. Robert Nichols (R-Jacksonville) and Joan Huffman (R-Houston).

Continuing to Fight in California

Friday, March 24, 2017

Continuing to Fight in California

We are excited to inform you of our new California specific webpage – Stand and Fight California.   On this page you will find State Legislation, Legal Updates, and How to Get Involved, among other California ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.