Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Delaware: Bill that Violates Due Process to Be Heard in Committee; Your Help is Needed!

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Delaware: Bill that Violates Due Process to Be Heard in Committee; Your Help is Needed!

Senate Bill 83 was recently introduced to the Delaware Legislature and has been assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee.  It is critical that you contact and urge members of the Senate Judiciary Committee to OPPOSE this piece of legislation that not only violates due process but also disrespects your Second Amendment rights.

If enacted, SB 83 would exceed current Delaware and federal law, and would allow abuse orders, which can be issued ex parte, to be issued without evidence that a person committed any actual act of harm against a person, or that the person has even been charged with any criminal act.  After the order has been processed a person would be disqualified from owning any firearms or ammunition.

Ex parte orders are issued without notice or a chance to be heard by the affected person. They are also based entirely on a one-sided version of events, as portrayed by the person who wants the order issued.  All that is needed is a preponderance of evidence that the person engaged, for example, in a “course of alarming or distressing conduct in a manner likely to cause fear or emotional distress.”  This is a very flimsy basis upon which to deny someone their fundamental, constitutional rights.  There is no requirement that a firearm (or any weapon) be used as part of the alleged abuse before the firearm disqualification may be imposed.

These orders may be brought against someone from a past relationship, even if there is no current physical or social connection.  For example, an individual may file an abuse order against someone they had a relationship with four years ago, and it would be a valid.

Once issued, under this bill the new prohibition on obtaining a firearm is effective immediately upon entry of the protective order, and not upon notice to the affected person.  A person subject to an order has to surrender all firearms and ammunition within his or her custody and control immediately on request or within 24 hours of being served with the order.  Within 48 hours of service, the person must file a certification or proof of transfer with the court.  SB 83 has no mechanism to allow for extensions.

If the order is ex parte, the order may be entered without the person having any knowledge that he or she is under a prohibition or disqualification from possession of firearms.  Any attempt by the person to acquire a firearm in the period between the entry of the order and actual notice may subject the person to the “prohibited person” penalties in Delaware. Under existing Delaware law, a prohibited person who knowingly possesses, purchases, owns or controls a deadly weapon or ammunition for a firearm while so prohibited is guilty of a class D felony.

SB 83 provides no option for a person to turn the firearms and ammunition over to a friend, family member, or other third party qualified to possess firearms.  A person who is subject to an order must relinquish firearms and ammunition to law enforcement.  The police are authorized to impose charges for the storage, although the bill does not set any rates for police storage of surrendered firearms or ammunition.  After a year, the storage fees may be more than a firearm or ammunition is worth.  If the firearms or ammunition are found to be items owned or claimed by another person, there is no requirement that a law enforcement agency be required to return them to the person who has a claim or interest.  Also SB 83 would allow police, after they give the owner the requisite notice, to sell or transfer of the firearms to a FFL or licensed collector, dealer, importer, or manufacturer with no right to the sale proceeds by the former owner.

It is of the utmost important that you contact your state Senator and urge them to OPPOSE Senate Bill 83.

Also, please contact the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and urge them to vote NO on SB 83 when it is heard. Contact information for committee members is provided below.

Senate Judiciary Committee:

Senator Margaret Rose Henry (D-2), Chair
(302) 744-4191
[email protected]

Senator Patricia M. Blevins (D-7)
(302) 744-4133
[email protected]

Senator Gregory F. Lavelle (R-4)
(302) 744-4048
[email protected]

Senator Harris B. McDowell (D-1)
(302) 744-4147
[email protected]

Senator F. Gary Simpson (R-18)
(302) 744-4134
[email protected]

Senator Bryan Townsend (D-11)
(302) 577-5316
[email protected]

TRENDING NOW
Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Redditors Embarrass Virginia Assembly’s Chief Gun Banner

In late August, Virginia State Delegate Dan Helmer (D-10), who represents a portion of the Northern Virginia D.C. suburb of Fairfax County, took to Reddit for an “ask me anything” (AMA) question and answer session.

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Virginia Case Shows Gun Control is Aimed at Decent Citizens, Not Criminals

Economics has a concept called “revealed preference.” The gist is that a person’s observed actions reveal more about their preferences than what a person might profess to favor. 

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Promise to Practice: Federal Firearm Rights Restoration is Now a Reality

The federal government’s promise to provide a pathway to restore firearm rights is no longer merely a commitment on paper. 

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

News  

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Unhealthy Exposure: Gun Ban Advocates Allergic to Defensive Gun Use

One of the narratives invented by gun control activists and their political allies to try to make their agenda more palatable to the general public has been to recast gun crime as a “public health ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

Saturday, September 5, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court “Assault Weapons” Cases

The National Rifle Association, alongside the Independence Institute and the American Suppressor Association, filed an amicus brief on Friday in the consolidated cases Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins, which challenge the "assault weapons” bans ...

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Federal Court Strikes Down NFA Registration Requirements for Suppressors, Short-Barreled Rifles, and Short-Barreled Shotguns in NRA Case

In another major victory for the National Rifle Association and law-abiding gun owners, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas today held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for ...

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

News  

Monday, August 17, 2026

Questions and Answers About the Texas NFA Case

On August 12, we reported on an important development in the ongoing litigation over the National Firearms Act (NFA) filed by multiple plaintiffs in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. These included, ...

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

News  

Friday, March 21, 2025

Trump Administration Revives Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Provision

On March 20, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) published an interim final rule entitled, Withdrawing the Attorney General’s Delegation of Authority. That bland title belies the historic nature of the measure, which is aimed at reviving ...

Biden-Era “Engaged in the Business” Rule (Again) Ruled Illegal

News  

Monday, August 31, 2026

Biden-Era “Engaged in the Business” Rule (Again) Ruled Illegal

The anti-gun programs and policies of the Biden-Harris administration have been falling like dominoes, lately.

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

News  

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

What Does the Texas NFA Decision Mean for You?

On August 5, 2026, Judge Wesley Hendrix of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the National Firearms Act’s registration and approval requirements for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.