NRA Explore
APPEARS IN News

Mark Kelly Lies About Gun Sales Before I-594 Vote

Friday, October 3, 2014

On Tuesday, five weeks before voters in Washington State will decide whether to require “universal” background checks on firearm transfers, gun control advocate Mark Kelly lied on national television about how many such transactions occur without a background check.  Asked by CNN, Kelly said (at 3:30 in the video), “right now 60 percent of all gun sales go--occur--with a background check.  Why do we allow the 40 percent, the other 40 percent, to happen?”

Kelly and his wife, former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, are the co-founders of the gun control group, Americans for Responsible Solutions.  On their group’s website, they make the “40 percent” claim in its most common form, saying “up to 40 percent of all gun transfers . . . take place without a background check.”

However they choose to word it, the claim is false, and even the media have been saying so for more than two years.  In July 2012, the Tampa Bay Times faulted Michael Bloomberg for claiming “There’s a loophole where you can sell guns without a background check at a gun show.  Forty percent of guns are sold that way, same thing on the internet.” 

Bloomberg said that the “40 percent” figure came from a study co-authored by gun control supporter Philip Cook in 1997 (a year before the national instant check system became operational).  However, Times’ PolitiFact reporters Jon Greenberg and Molly Moorhead asked Cook if he considered the “40 percent” figure to be a reliable estimate of secondary market gun sales currently.  Cook’s response, as Greenberg and Moorhead reported, was “I have no idea. This survey was done almost 20 years ago.”

Unfortunately, anti-gun activists are not only willing to say just about anything to get “universal” checks imposed, they are willing to say it often, because they believe it’s the stepping stone to the gun control restrictions they ultimately seek.

Eight months after Bloomberg’s “40 percent” claim was refuted, President Obama repeated it during a White House event promoting his multi-faceted gun control agenda.  But this time it was one of the most the anti-gun newspapers in the country that declared it false.  Noting that Professor Cook and his 1997 study’s co-author, Jens Ludwig, had written “we don’t know the current percentage -- nor does anyone else,” the Washington Post’s FactChecker, Glenn Kessler, rated Obama’s claim “Three Pinocchios.”

Shamelessly, Obama still uses the “40 percent” claim on the White House website’s gun violence page and within his Now Is The Time gun control plan.  Similarly, the increasingly tiresome Bloomberg, who is underwriting the I-594 campaign, repeats the claim in propaganda published by his anti-gun “Mayors” and “Everytown” groups here, here, here and here.  The figurehead of his anti-gun “moms” group, Shannon Watts, repeated it on NBC’s “Meet the Press 24/7” in April.

Kelly is a former astronaut, so we could poke fun at him for being “Lost in Space” and for “astronomically” exaggerating the figure for private gun transfers, and we could urge him to “return to Earth” with his rhetoric.  For Lost in Space fans, we could even say that his figure “does not compute.”

However, what Kelly, Giffords, Bloomberg, Watts and Obama are trying to do is not a joking matter.  They are trying to deceive the public into supporting something that they know couldn’t possibly prevent criminals from getting guns, but that could pave the way for worse gun control restrictions in the future.

No amount of gun control propaganda changes the fact that most criminals get guns by stealing them, buying stolen guns on the black market, and by getting straw purchasers to go through background checks to buy guns for them.  Requiring more checks can’t change that, anti-gun activists know it, but they push for “universal” checks anyway because they believe that background check systems can eventually be morphed into registries of gun sales and, over time, registries of gun owners.

That, along with the inability of any background check system to prevent criminals from getting guns, is why defeating “universal” check restrictions and the candidates who support them should be an ongoing priority for gun owners throughout the United States.

TRENDING NOW
Couric’s Under the Gun, Under Fire Again

News  

Friday, August 26, 2016

Couric’s Under the Gun, Under Fire Again

The film Under the Gun, produced and narrated by news anchor Katie Couric and directed by Stephanie Soechtig, took a major credibility hit soon after its May release, when it was revealed that the film ...

Massachusetts AG Renews Attack on Gun Owners

News  

Friday, August 26, 2016

Massachusetts AG Renews Attack on Gun Owners

Last week, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey added to the confusion caused by her decision to unilaterally ban common semi-automatic firearms by releasing a list of “Guns That Are Not Assault Weapons.” In other words, ...

Libertarian VP Candidate William F. Weld Continues to be Anti-Gun

News  

Friday, August 26, 2016

Libertarian VP Candidate William F. Weld Continues to be Anti-Gun

As governor of Massachusetts, William Weld supported various gun control schemes, including a ban on semi-automatic firearms.  Unfortunately, and despite being the Libertarian candidate for vice president, Weld continues his anti-gun ways.

As Venezuelan Regime Loses Grip, Maduro Targets Guns

News  

Friday, August 26, 2016

As Venezuelan Regime Loses Grip, Maduro Targets Guns

Amid social and economic strife that threatens to topple the regime of Nicolas Maduro, the Venezuelan government is employing a favorite tactic of tyrants the world over, further gun control. Last week, Reuters reported that Venezuela Interior ...

News  

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

NRA Statement on Governor Christie's Conditional Vetoes of Anti-Gun Bills

NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris Cox applauds New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's heroic conditional vetoes of two anti-gun bills that would further restrict the rights of firearm owners throughout the Garden State.

Injunction Sought Against Texas Campus Carry Denied by Judge

News  

Friday, August 26, 2016

Injunction Sought Against Texas Campus Carry Denied by Judge

In July, University of Texas at Austin professors Jennifer Lynn Glass, Lisa Moore, and Mia Carter filed suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and UT officials to ...

Massachusetts Attorney General Unilaterally Bans Thousands of Previously Legal Guns

News  

Friday, July 22, 2016

Massachusetts Attorney General Unilaterally Bans Thousands of Previously Legal Guns

On July 19, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey issued an “enforcement notice” that greatly expands the Commonwealth’s definition of “assault weapon.”  AG Healey alleges that the ban’s definition of “copy” or “duplicate” “assault weapons” has been misinterpreted ...

California: Counting Down to the end of the 2016 Legislative Session

Friday, August 26, 2016

California: Counting Down to the end of the 2016 Legislative Session

As the California legislature enters the final days of the 2016 legislative session your action is needed on several bills. This week both a pro-gun bill, AB 2510, and an anti-gun bill, SB 1332, were ...

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

Gun Laws  

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Guide To The Interstate Transportation Of Firearms

CAUTION: Federal and state firearms laws are subject to frequent change. This summary is not to be considered as legal advice or a restatement of law.

Tennessee: Pro-Gun Law to Go into Effect Friday

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Tennessee: Pro-Gun Law to Go into Effect Friday

During the 2016 Legislative Session, the Tennessee Legislature passed multiple pro-gun bills that promote and protect your Second Amendment rights

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.