Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

DOJ Budget Request Reveals Some Questionable Priorities but Isn't the Increase Some Feared

Friday, March 7, 2014

On Tuesday, March 4, the Obama administration released its budget proposal for fiscal year 2015, and one portion of the proposal immediately raised the ire of many gun owners. The Department of Justice released a fact sheet detailing the department's request for "gun safety" spending to the tune of an eye-popping $1.1 billion, some of which is touted as supporting Obama's "Now is the Time" gun control initiative.

Some have misinterpreted the fact sheet to mean a proposed $1.1 billion dollar increase in this type of spending, or an enormous increase from $382.1 million in funds requested in a FY 2014 DOJ "gun safety" fact sheet. These two numbers from the different fact sheets should not be conflated, however, as the $1.1 billion requested for FY 2015 is for the total funding for programs that the DOJ considers part of its "gun safety" efforts, while the $382.1 million in funding listed in the FY 2014 fact sheet is for proposed increases for that year. And while the $1.1 billion in proposed funding for FY 2015 certainly contains some regrettable spending, the vast majority of that total is to maintain current federal programs that enforce current federal gun laws, some of which need not alarm law-abiding gun owners.

Many gun owners reading the DOJ FY 2015 fact sheet will take particular offense to the document's trumpeting of a proposed $182.4 million in spending to further the president's "Now is the Time" initiative. And gun owners are right to be concerned, as the "Now is the Time" plan includes several anti-gun efforts, including a ban on popular semi-automatic firearms and their magazines and the elimination of private firearm transfers. However, the $182.4 million in proposed "Now is the Time" spending largely focuses on areas that are less of a threat to gun rights.

For instance, here is a description of some of the "Now is the Time" spending: "[Office of Justice Programs], with the support of the FBI, will be providing a specialized training course for active shooter situations for law enforcement officers, first responders, and school officials. The Department is requesting a total of $15.0 million to support this training and other officer safety initiatives." Another $75 million of the proposed "Now is the Time" spending is for "grant funding to the Comprehensive School Safety Program, which was funded for the first time in FY 2014." Such spending correctly focuses on preventing future tragedies, without targeting law-abiding gun owners.

Funding requested under the "Now is the Time" umbrella also consists of $55 million in grants to states and $13.4 million to the FBI in order to provide more records to the NICS system and maintain "improvements made to NICS in FY 2014."

There are, however, at least two significant areas of concern for gun owners within the funding that falls under the "Now is the Time" initiative, particularly in light of the nation's already ballooning federal deficit. First, is a proposed $22 million increase in BATFE funding to "sustain critical investments made in FY 2014 in firearms enforcement, investigations and inspection activities as well as tools such as the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network (NIBIN) in support of the 'Now is the Time' initiative."

In recent years BATFE has shown a penchant to misuse the funding it has already been given. The Fast & Furious scandal brought to light the flawed BATFE investigative techniques that played a part in the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. More recently, the BATFE has garnered criticism for botched sting operations conducted in Milwaukee, Wis., and Portland, Ore., that in some cases exploited the mentally disabled. Additionally, any increase in funds for "investigation and inspection activities" could, depending on how they were used, be used to further burden law-abiding gun owners and gun dealers.

Second, the "Now is the Time" portion of the budget request includes $2 million "to support the Administration's challenge to the private sector to develop innovative and cost-effective gun safety technology." In other words, the administration intends to use $2 million in taxpayer dollars to promote "smart gun" technology that the public has already rejected. A 2013 NSSF poll found that of those surveyed, 74 percent thought that a "smart gun" would be "not very reliable" or "not reliable at all" for protection. Another question found that 81 percent of those surveyed were "not very likely [to]" or "would not buy" a "smart gun." Federal promotion of this technology is reason for concern, as it has long been an objective of gun control advocates to mandate that only firearms containing such technology be sold.

All told, the proposed $1.1 billion in "gun safety" spending has some hits, like increased funding for school safety measures, and some definite misses, such as the $2 million "smart gun" boondoggle. But much of it falls somewhere in between, providing funding to enforce the nation's current gun control laws.  It is important to remember that the recently released documents only represent a proposed budget from the executive branch, with Congress holding the ultimate authority over the purse strings of government. Further, as always, NRA-ILA will be working with members of Congress to protect the interests of gun owners.

TRENDING NOW
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Ignores Heller: No Protection for Guns It Deems “Dangerous”

News  

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Ignores Heller: No Protection for Guns It Deems “Dangerous”

Ever since the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinions in Heller and McDonald, many of the lower U.S. courts have been making up their own rules when it comes to the Second Amendment. Tuesday’s outrageous opinion by ...

Hawaii: Anti-Gun Legislation Passes Committee

Thursday, February 23, 2017

Hawaii: Anti-Gun Legislation Passes Committee

SB 898, sponsored by state Senator Ronald Kouchi (D-8), would permanently strip an individual of their Second Amendment rights, not based on a criminal conviction or mental adjudication, but based on a quasi-criminal proceeding.  The ...

Washington: Anti-Gun Legislation Could be Heard on the Floor Next Week

Friday, February 24, 2017

Washington: Anti-Gun Legislation Could be Heard on the Floor Next Week

As early as next week, the Washington House of Representatives could hear and vote on House Bill 1122 and House Bill 1483.

Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of Petition for Supreme Court Review in Peruta Right-to-Carry Case

Friday, February 24, 2017

Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of Petition for Supreme Court Review in Peruta Right-to-Carry Case

In January, California Rifle & Pistol Association attorneys filed a petitionwith the United States Supreme Court asking the Court to review the NRA-supported case of Peruta v. California, which seeks to confirm that the Second ...

Taxachusetts: Bay State Politician Wants to Soak Gun Owners

News  

Friday, February 24, 2017

Taxachusetts: Bay State Politician Wants to Soak Gun Owners

In an attempt to further punish Massachusetts’s beleaguered gun owners, on January 20, Massachusetts State Senator Cynthia S. Creem filed SD.1884. The legislation includes a raft of gun control measures, not the least of which ...

DNC Chair Frontrunner Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) Hides from his Radical Anti-gun Record

News  

Friday, February 24, 2017

DNC Chair Frontrunner Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) Hides from his Radical Anti-gun Record

With the Democratic National Committee’s officers election set for Saturday, earlier this week CNN hosted a debate featuring the candidates vying to be the next DNC chair. During the debate, CNN’s Dana Bash confronted Rep. ...

A Fourth Circuit Trifecta: New Rulings Confirm Need for Judges who Respect Second Amendment

News  

Friday, February 24, 2017

A Fourth Circuit Trifecta: New Rulings Confirm Need for Judges who Respect Second Amendment

Anyone still unconvinced about the importance of the courts and the need for justices who support Second Amendment rights had plenty of food for thought this month, with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Praises Legacy Media in Interview with British Press

News  

Friday, February 24, 2017

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Praises Legacy Media in Interview with British Press

Citing Justice John Paul Stevens’s retirement at age 90, the U.S. Supreme Court’s reigning liberal icon, 83-year-old Justice Ruther Bader Ginsburg, told a BBC interviewer that she still “has a way to go” in her ...

Kentucky: Senate Constitutional/Permitless Carry Legislation Amended

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Kentucky: Senate Constitutional/Permitless Carry Legislation Amended

Today, Senator Robin Webb (D-18) offered a strike and insert amendment to constitutional/permitless carry legislation, Senate Bill 7.

New Hampshire Governor Signs Constitutional Carry Into Law

News  

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

New Hampshire Governor Signs Constitutional Carry Into Law

Measure Effective Immediately. Today was a great victory for gun owners in New Hampshire when Gov. Chris Sununu signed Senate Bill 12 into law, allowing law-abiding New Hampshirites to carry their firearms in the manner that ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.