NRA Explore
APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Supreme Court Grants Cert in Abramski v. United States

Friday, January 17, 2014

On October 15, 2013, certiorari was granted by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Bruce J. Abramski v. United States, with oral arguments set for January 22, 2014. The case concerns whether BATFE’s policy barring the purchase of a firearm by a non-prohibited person for the purpose of selling it to another lawful purchaser exceeds the authority given to the agency under the Gun Control Act.

The case originated when Abramski, a former law enforcement officer, used a law enforcement discount to purchase a gun for his uncle. Abramski purchased the gun at a dealer then transported the gun to his uncle’s hometown. The pair then went to a local federally licensed firearms dealer, where Abramski transferred the gun to his uncle, after the uncle filled out a 4473 form and a submitted to a background check. Subsequently, the BATFE prosecuted Abramski for making a false statement on the 4473 during his initial purchase of the firearm, as he had responded affirmatively to a question asking whether he was the “actual buyer” of the gun.

In their petition for cert, lawyers for Abramski asked the Court to answer two questions. Whether or not a gun purchaser’s intent to sell a gun to another eligible buyer in the future is lawful, and whether that intent is information that is required to be kept by a federally licensed firearms dealer. The petition points out the importance of the Supreme Court’s intervention in the case, noting that the courts of appeals for the Fifth and Ninth Circuits have found that these types of purchases lawful, while the Fourth, Sixth and Eleventh Circuits have taken the opposite position.

In a friend of the court brief filed August 26, 2013, lawyers for the NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund (CRDF) outline an argument making clear that BATFE is well outside its congressional mandate in criminalizing these types of transactions. The brief states that in authoring the GCA it was Congress’ intent “to keep firearms away from the persons Congress classified as potentially irresponsible and dangerous,” citing the earlier case of Barrett v. U.S. Also cited is the preamble to the GCA, which states, “it is not the purpose of this title to place any undue or unnecessary Federal restrictions or burdens on law-abiding citizens with respect to the acquisition, possession, or use of firearms,” and, “this title is not intended to… provide for the imposition by Federal regulation of any procedures or requirements other than those reasonable necessary to implement and effectuate the provisions of this title.” This suggests that BATFE has overstepped congressional intent with prosecutions of gun purchasers like Abramski, as Congress intended that the GCA prohibit sales only to a very specific set of persons. Therefore BATFE’s inclusion of the question on the Form 4473 asking whether a purchaser is the actual buyer of the firearm criminalizes conduct that Congress did not seek to prohibit and is therefore unlawful.

In making the case against the prohibition, the brief goes on to point out that BATFE’s definition of what constitutes an illegal sale of this type has been inconsistent. A BATFE Industry Circular stated in 1980, “It makes no difference that the dealer knows that the purchaser will later transfer the firearm to another person, so long as the ultimate recipient is not prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm.” Further, BATFE does allow for an exemption to the “actual buyer” rule if a firearm is being purchased as a gift.

The NRA brief also argues that BATFE’s inclusion of the “actual buyer” question on form 4473 violates the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires the creation of legislative rules to involve notice and a comment period. CRDF explains that BATFE’s “actual buyer” rule does not fall into the narrow exceptions under which an agency is allowed to promulgate a rule without following prescribed procedure.

Congress’ intent in enacting the GCA was to make it unlawful for persons falling into certain categories to acquire or possess firearm. An improperly enacted BATFE rule barring lawful gun purchasers from selling guns to other lawful gun purchasers does nothing to further Congress’ goal or promote public safety, and it is easy to see how lawful gun owners are encumbered by this rule. For instance, a non-prohibited person might have a friend or relative that lives a distance away and has access to a better-stocked or lower-priced gun dealer and is willing to purchase a firearm on their behalf to transfer to them later. As long as the initial and ultimate purchasers are not prohibited, Congress’ goal of barring people in prohibited categories from purchasing guns is intact. In the coming months NRA will keep a close eye on this case and its important ramifications for gun owners, and will provide updates following January’s oral arguments.

TRENDING NOW
Katie Couric is an Anti-Gun Fraud and Hypocrite

News  

Friday, May 27, 2016

Katie Couric is an Anti-Gun Fraud and Hypocrite

Google-search “Katie Couric, gun control, edited” and you’ll see what we’re talking about. Actually, you’ll see what most news organizations are talking about.

Ohio: NICS Compliant Standard Now Recognized for All Valid Ohio Concealed Handgun License Holders

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Ohio: NICS Compliant Standard Now Recognized for All Valid Ohio Concealed Handgun License Holders

Yesterday, Attorney General Mike DeWine announced that Ohioans who possess a valid concealed handgun license no longer have to submit themselves to additional background checks when purchasing firearms.  The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and ...

North Carolina: Right to Hunt and Fish Legislation Introduced

Thursday, May 26, 2016

North Carolina: Right to Hunt and Fish Legislation Introduced

Yesterday, Senate Bill 889 was introduced in the North Carolina state senate.  S889 seeks to amend the North Carolina Constitution to affirm that it is a right of the public to hunt, fish and harvest ...

California: Anti-Gun Bills Sent to Assembly Suspense File Scheduled to be Heard Tomorrow, May 27

Thursday, May 26, 2016

California: Anti-Gun Bills Sent to Assembly Suspense File Scheduled to be Heard Tomorrow, May 27

On Friday May 27, the state Assembly Committee on Appropriations is scheduled to hear all the bills sent to the suspense file.  There are five anti-gun bills that greatly impact gun owners, sportsmen, and Second ...

White House Gun Control Meeting - Let’s “Set the Table” for the New President

News  

Friday, May 27, 2016

White House Gun Control Meeting - Let’s “Set the Table” for the New President

Speaking at a May 24 “Gun Violence Prevention Convening” held at the White House with state and local government officials, Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. appeared to concede that the window for further gun control measures ...

California: Assembly Appropriations Committee Sends Several Anti-Guns Bills to the Assembly Floor

Friday, May 27, 2016

California: Assembly Appropriations Committee Sends Several Anti-Guns Bills to the Assembly Floor

On Friday, May 27, the state Assembly Committee on Appropriations passed four of the five anti-gun bills on a party-line vote. AB 1664, AB 1673, AB 1674 and AB 1695 will now join AB 2607  for ...

“Rap Back”: A New Federal Firearm Registry

News  

Friday, May 27, 2016

“Rap Back”: A New Federal Firearm Registry

As part of the FBI’s Next Generation Identification Program, the agency is implementing what it calls the “Rap Back” service.  “Rap Back” provides law enforcement agencies – at their request – ongoing alerts on specific ...

Sen. Schumer Introduces Gun Control Bill After Brady Campaign Tantrum

Friday, May 20, 2016

Sen. Schumer Introduces Gun Control Bill After Brady Campaign Tantrum

For the past several months, Brady Campaign President Dan Gross has been repeatedly telling anyone who will listen that support for gun control is at a “tipping point.” Gross’ theory suffered a blow this week as the Brady Campaign ...

South Carolina: Time Running Out for South Carolina Right-to-Carry Recognition

Thursday, May 26, 2016

South Carolina: Time Running Out for South Carolina Right-to-Carry Recognition

The South Carolina Senate is set to adjourn next week, so there is little time left to act on  H. 3799.  While the bill is on the Special Order calendar, anti-gun state Senator Marlon Kimpson (D-42) is leading the charge ...

New Jersey: Anti-Gun Legislation to be Heard in Assembly Committee, Your Help Needed

Friday, May 27, 2016

New Jersey: Anti-Gun Legislation to be Heard in Assembly Committee, Your Help Needed

On Thursday, June 2, the Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee will hear Assembly Concurrent Resolution 175/Senate Concurrent Resolution 101.  Your NRA-ILA, along with Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs (ANJJRPC), vigorously supported New Jersey’s right ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.