Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Seattle Mayor Recruits Local Businesses to Carry on Failed Gun Ban Effort

Friday, August 23, 2013

As regular readers of this page know, Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels in 2008 ignored state law and the advice of the state’s attorney general and created so-called “gun-free” zones in public recreational facilities within the city.  These restrictions applied to all lawful carry, including by those with a state-issued concealed carry license.  A state court, however, soundly rejected Seattle’s theory that the state’s comprehensive firearms preemption law did not apply because the ban only affected city owned or controlled property.   As the trial judge noted in her opinion, “If I were to accept the City’s argument … [n]othing would prevent the City from preventing people from being on the street with their firearms, being on the waterway with their firearms, being on any part of a park with their firearms, or being in any other place that the City of Seattle has control over.” 

Nickels’s successor, Mike McGinn, nevertheless took up the cause with an appeal, but the trial court’s ruling was affirmed, and the state’s highest court later refused to hear the case [http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2017703405_gunban09m.html].

Despite this series of defeats (or perhaps because of them) Mayor McGinn remains committed to the vision of a defenseless Seattle.  The mayor is now teaming up with a local gun control organization to establish new “gun free zones” in the city’s private businesses.  Businesses are being provided with stickers, designed at the expense of the gun control group, and encouraged to post them to warn visitors that those in possession of firearms will be considered trespassers. 

The business owners at least in theory retain the choice as to whether or not to post their premises.  Nevertheless, the mayor’s partnership with a private organization that claims it is engaged in a “culture war” against firearms and their owners sends a strong message to those whose livelihoods depend on operating a business in the city.  Whether compulsory or not, the officially sanctioned view is clearly anti-gun.

The president of the gun control group involved acknowledged that these so-called gun free zones are not going to stop a “determined killer.”  Yet in statements to the press, he invoked the typical anti-gunner’s paranoid view of his neighbors and fellow citizens as would-be murderers whose irresistible impulses to kill are thwarted only by the absence of readily-available firearms.  The group’s website also claims the measure is intended to “change the conversation around gun violence.”  Apparently, however, the only word Mayor McGinn and his gun control sidekicks are interested in having with Seattle residents who would exercise their constitutional rights to bear arms is “No!”                

Perhaps not coincidentally, this public-private partnership to restrict constitutional rights comes on the heels of a failed campaign to pressure Starbucks into instituting a strict no-firearm policy in its retail outlets.  Like most businesses serving the public in most locations, Starbucks simply defers to local law regarding the carrying of firearms in its restaurants.  This has attracted the wrath of some anti-gun activists who apparently consider coffee houses an especially crucial theatre of conflict in their self-proclaimed “culture war.”

                Of course, just as businesses have the prerogative to determine terms of entry on their premises, customers have the prerogative of determining who gets their business.  If the Starbucks example is any indication, freedom-friendly businesses have nothing to fear, as the coffee chain’s profits have surged following anti-gunners’ insistent calls for boycotts. 

TRENDING NOW
“Death by a Thousand Cuts” – Latest Ninth Circuit decision proclaims “selling firearms is not part or parcel of the right to keep and bear arms”

Second Amendment  

Friday, October 13, 2017

“Death by a Thousand Cuts” – Latest Ninth Circuit decision proclaims “selling firearms is not part or parcel of the right to keep and bear arms”

Since the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark rulings in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago, lower courts across the country have expressed their disagreement with – or downright hostility to ...

Alleged Sexual Predator and Hollywood Mogul Harvey Weinstein Threatens NRA (Again)

News  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Alleged Sexual Predator and Hollywood Mogul Harvey Weinstein Threatens NRA (Again)

On October 5, the New York Times published an article titled, “Harvey Weinstein Paid Off Sexual Harassment Accusers for Decades.” The piece detailed allegations that the mogul used his position of influence to make unwanted ...

Gun Banners Unmasked: The Vengeful Face of the Anti-gun Agenda Emerges Once Again

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Gun Banners Unmasked: The Vengeful Face of the Anti-gun Agenda Emerges Once Again

What happens to the 400 million or so firearms already in private hands? How does society actually benefit from his plan? Stephens doesn’t say. He apparently just trusts that things would eventually work themselves out ...

California: Governor Brown Signs Remaining Anti-Gun Bill

Sunday, October 15, 2017

California: Governor Brown Signs Remaining Anti-Gun Bill

Yesterday, Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill 424, the remaining anti-gun bill on his desk. 

Shall-Issue Concealed Carry Coming Soon to the Nation’s Capital!

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Shall-Issue Concealed Carry Coming Soon to the Nation’s Capital!

It’s important to celebrate that law-abiding Americans are now closer than they have been in nearly half a century to being able to exercise their firearms freedom in our nation’s capital. That is real progress.

California: Governor Vetoes Dealer Storage Bill and Signs Open Carry Ban

Saturday, October 14, 2017

California: Governor Vetoes Dealer Storage Bill and Signs Open Carry Ban

Yesterday, Governor Brown took action on two of the remaining three anti-gun bills by vetoing Senate Bill 464 and signing Assembly Bill 7. 

Media Consumers Beware: Watchdogs Warn of Bias, Politics, and Influence Tainting the “News”

News  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Media Consumers Beware: Watchdogs Warn of Bias, Politics, and Influence Tainting the “News”

Project Veritas’s “American Pravda” series has focused on the media itself, with prior releases including segments on CNN producers and personalities casting doubt on the network’s own narrative about Russian influence in the U.S. presidential ...

Spokane Police To Use Suppressors To Protect Hearing

News  

Monday, October 16, 2017

Spokane Police To Use Suppressors To Protect Hearing

The Spokane PD has 181 service rifles in its inventory; using suppressors on them has the potential to reduce workers compensation claims and lawsuits from bystanders.

California: San Jose City Council to Consider Mandatory Locked Storage Ordinance

Monday, October 16, 2017

California: San Jose City Council to Consider Mandatory Locked Storage Ordinance

On Tuesday, October 17, the San Jose City Council will be discussing a proposed firearms ordinance that will require any person who possesses a firearm in their residence to store the firearm in a locked ...

Massachusetts: Gun Control Bill on the Move

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Massachusetts: Gun Control Bill on the Move

Today, without considering the unintended effects of such poorly thought out legislation, the Massachusetts state House of Representatives passed Amendment 1 attached to House Bill 3951 with overreaching language that would ban modifications commonly made ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.