Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Appeals Under Way in Challenge to San Francisco Laws

Monday, June 24, 2013

On Nov. 26, a federal judge denied the plaintiffs’ motion (in the case of Jackson v. City & County of San Francisco) for a preliminary injunction to prevent San Francisco from enforcing its locked-firearm-storage requirement and its ban on the sale of popular ammunition that “serves no sporting purpose.”

The storage provision requires the locked storage of all handguns inside the home unless “carried on the person.” In opposition to the requirement, the motion cited Heller’s recognition that defense inside the home is the core of the Second Amendment right and argues that the storage requirement clearly conflicts with this finding. Quoting Heller,  the motion said, “‘whatever else [the Second Amendment] leaves to future evaluation, it surely elevates above all other interests the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home,’” which should make restrictions like the storage law “subject to the highest level of scrutiny.”

On the ammunition ban, the motion pointed out that ammunition is clearly protected under the Second Amendment, and no historical justification exists for curtailing the sale of certain types of ammunition. Therefore, under the view of the Second Amendment adopted in Heller, San Francisco’s ban must be invalid.

In his decision denying the motion, Judge Richard Seeborg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California wrote, “Heller left too much unsettled for it to dictate a particular result here.” 

Undeterred, on Feb. 7, NRA-backed lawyers appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The opening brief for the plaintiffs noted, “The City’s restrictions exist at the extreme end of the gun-regulation continuum, they impinge upon the core right to self-defense in the home, and present a total ban on the sale of ammunition protected by the Constitution.”

In their responding brief on March 3, the city and county further defended their position on the city’s storage law and what they call “enhanced lethality ammunition.” The city mischaracterizes comparisons between San Francisco’s storage ordinance and others around the country that, while burdensome, are far less prohibitive than its own. Additionally, the defendants suggest that anything short of a “prohibition on the sale of any ammunition, or any ammunition other than ineffectual rubber bullets,” would not burden Second Amendment rights. Also weighing in with “friend of the court” briefs on the city’s behalf were the Brady Campaign and the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

Further complicating matters for law-abiding gun owners, in March the San Francisco Board of Supervisors enacted an ordinance “to prohibit the possession or sale of certain ammunition, including Black Talon ammunition and ammunition intended exclusively for law enforcement and military purposes,” that went into effect April 12. During the debate on the law, politicians and media sources touted the legislation as a complete ban on the possession of hollow point ammunition.

Concerned that the new law would outlaw most self-defense ammunition, NRA threatened legal action against the city. However, on March 29 the Police Department of the City and County of San Francisco sent the NRA’s lawyers a letter clarifying the effects of the law. In direct contrast to what was stated by certain legislators and the media, Captain Dennis F. O’Leary of the San Francisco Police Department Operations Bureau made clear that the law does not ban all hollow point ammunition, only ammunition that is “physically identical to Black Talon ammunition or that performs identically to it in all respects,” along with other yet-to-be-determined ammunition that will be listed in a database to be created by the police department.

Even with that clarification, the fight in San Francisco could affect the ability of other like-minded localities to enact similar bans, and the NRA will continue to advocate for the availability of effective self-defense ammunition.

TRENDING NOW
California: DOJ Issues “Notice of Modification” to Proposed Ammunition Background Check Regulations

Thursday, April 18, 2019

California: DOJ Issues “Notice of Modification” to Proposed Ammunition Background Check Regulations

Today, the California Department of Justice issued a “Notice of Modification” to their proposed regulations regarding the soon to be implemented ammunition background check procedures. As a result of these changes, a second 15-day public ...

Heeee’s Baaack: Bill Clinton Peddles Gun Control on a Wish and a Lie

News  

Friday, April 19, 2019

Heeee’s Baaack: Bill Clinton Peddles Gun Control on a Wish and a Lie

Proving there is no statute of limitations on political opportunism, this week former President Bill Clinton used the occasion of the twentieth anniversary of the tragic school shooting in Littleton, Colo. to pen an op-ed pushing ...

Maine: Firearm Seizure Bill Heads To Judiciary Committee

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Maine: Firearm Seizure Bill Heads To Judiciary Committee

On April 22nd, the Maine Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on Legislative Document 1312, which would allow for firearms to be seized and Second Amendment rights to be suspended without due process. 

Texas: House Passes Evacuation Carry Bill

Thursday, April 18, 2019

Texas: House Passes Evacuation Carry Bill

On Thursday, the Texas House gave final approval to House Bill 1177 by a vote of 102-29.

Pittsburgh Residents Seek Preliminary Injunction Against Ban on Standard Capacity Magazines

News  

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Pittsburgh Residents Seek Preliminary Injunction Against Ban on Standard Capacity Magazines

With support from the NRA, gun owners challenging Pittsburgh’s ban on publicly carrying loaded magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds filed a motion today seeking a preliminary injunction. If the motion is granted, ...

NRA Statement on New York City's Desperate Attempt to Avoid Supreme Court Review

News  

Friday, April 12, 2019

NRA Statement on New York City's Desperate Attempt to Avoid Supreme Court Review

NRA reacts to New York City's attempt to avoid having the NRA-supported Supreme Court case N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Association, et al. v. City of N.Y., et al heard in DC. 

Idaho: Governor Signs Important Self-Defense Legislation into Law

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Idaho: Governor Signs Important Self-Defense Legislation into Law

Yesterday, Governor Brad Little signed important self-defense legislation, House Bill 206, into law.

Breaking! Federal Court Finds California Magazine Ban Violates the Second Amendment

News  

Friday, March 29, 2019

Breaking! Federal Court Finds California Magazine Ban Violates the Second Amendment

In one of the strongest judicial statements in favor of the Second Amendment to date, Judge Roger T. Benitez of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California determined on Friday that California’s ...

New York Times Admits Privately-Funded “Gun Violence” Research is a Thing

News  

Friday, April 19, 2019

New York Times Admits Privately-Funded “Gun Violence” Research is a Thing

The New York Times – the “paper of record” – reports that “Gun Research is Suddenly Hot.” While we’re happy to see the Times has finally acknowledged that “gun research” can survive federal restrictions on taxpayer funded gun control ...

Oregon: Gun Control Package Sent To Another Committee

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Oregon: Gun Control Package Sent To Another Committee

Thanks to NRA members and Second Amendment supporters who contacted their state Senators in opposition, Senate Bill 978 has been sent to the Oregon Senate Committee on Rules instead of directly to the Senate floor ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.