Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

"National Conversation" Is One-Sided

Friday, March 1, 2013

By Wayne LaPierre, NRA Executive Vice President

The new watchword for the firearm-confiscation movement in America is “national conversation”—a term that takes on ominous meaning for millions of peaceable, innocent gun owners, especially in light of President Barack Obama’s threat to institute new, draconian gun bans and universal gun-owner registration schemes.

With the mass murder of school children in Newtown, Conn., by a clearly deranged killer, the nature of this “conversation” has been defined by the key figures in the gun-ban movement—from the president, to New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, to the Brady Campaign, to literally hundreds of editorial writers.

Much of the “conversation” in the media has been a new level of hatred against gun owners, the Second Amendment and those who defend the right to keep and bear arms, especially the NRA.

A commentary by retired opinion writer Donald Kaul in the Des Moines Register provides a hint of the real meaning of this “conversation.” Here are Kaul’s demands:

“Repeal the Second Amendment, the part about guns anyway. …

“Declare the NRA a terrorist organization and make membership illegal. Hey! We did it to the Communist Party, and the NRA has led to the deaths of more of us than American Commies ever did. (I would also raze the organization’s headquarters, clear the rubble and salt the earth, but that’s optional.) Make ownership of unlicensed assault rifles a felony. If some people refused to give up their guns, that ‘prying the guns from their cold, dead hands’ thing works for me.”

If that last part of the “conversation” sounds unhinged, try this from the governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, who was the gun control majordomo in the Bill Clinton White House:

“Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option.”

Confiscation. There it is. Finally, the end game has been spelled out by someone in power. No one in the gun-ban crowd has denied it. Forcible government taking of constitutionally protected private property is now just part of the “conversation.”

“Conversation” means they dictate and gun owners obey.

Dan Gross of the Brady Campaign has bragged that “… the national conversation about common sense solutions to gun violence continues to gain unprecedented momentum.” (Emphasis added.)

Creating hatred for NRA members is a major part of Gross’s “national conversation.” He praised radical journalist Jason Whitlock, who wrote:

“I believe the NRA is the new KKK. And that the arming of so many black youths, and loading up our community with drugs, and then just having an open shooting gallery, is the work of people who obviously don’t have our best interests [at heart].”

Here’s another example from the “gun-banner” blog, which quotes the Obama 2012 platform stating: “We believe in an honest, open national conversation about firearms.” Those words are followed with this:

“As a violence policy advocate I support having reasoned discourse about common sense gun laws that will register and eventually disarm the public. …”

How about this from Scott Blakeman, a left-wing Fox News contributor, as a “conversation” opener:

“The National Rifle Association essentially harbors terrorists, by resisting any attempt to apply sensible regulations on gun use.

“… The President must start the national conversation about gun violence right now.”

But this “conversation” isn’t just about semi-auto rifles. Consider the words of White House confidant, frequent Obama water-carrier and national commentator Bob Beckel:

“The culture of violence with handguns in this country is out of control. … If it was up to me, you’d ban all handguns, every one of them. Burn them. Get rid of them.”

Then there is CNN’s Piers Morgan who said flat-out on his Dec. 3 program, “I’d remove every gun in America. Boom.” That’s the essence of the “national conversation.”

Ask yourself, what is there to talk about? Power for them, and the total, ultimate loss of our liberty for us.

For gun owners—especially for NRA members—when it comes to the Second Amendment, the truth is there is nothing to talk about beyond what the founding fathers intended.

The word “conversation” in normal context means there’s a give and take. But in the context of “gun control,” it will always mean one thing: THEY TAKE, AND WE ARE SUPPOSED TO GIVE.

For at least 50 years—beginning with the birth of the gun control movement in the United States—the gun-banners’ part of the “conversation” about the Second Amendment was universally the same: “The individual right never existed. There is nothing to discuss. It is a fact.”

In their “conversation,” only government had the “right.” That “conversation” from the gun-banners didn’t end when the U.S. Supreme Court twice upheld an individual right to keep and bear arms for all Americans; it just changed. They are now saying the right exists, but government can infringe the Second Amendment into oblivion.

The one-sided conversation will never end, but the facts are on our side. Our part of the conversation is to ask, “What don’t you anti-gun opportunists understand about ‘No’?”

After all, the facts, the law, and the Constitution are clearly on our side. When it comes to the principle of losing freedom, there is nothing to talk about. We must stand and fight.

TRENDING NOW
Alleged Sexual Predator and Hollywood Mogul Harvey Weinstein Threatens NRA (Again)

News  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Alleged Sexual Predator and Hollywood Mogul Harvey Weinstein Threatens NRA (Again)

On October 5, the New York Times published an article titled, “Harvey Weinstein Paid Off Sexual Harassment Accusers for Decades.” The piece detailed allegations that the mogul used his position of influence to make unwanted ...

Gun Banners Unmasked: The Vengeful Face of the Anti-gun Agenda Emerges Once Again

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Gun Banners Unmasked: The Vengeful Face of the Anti-gun Agenda Emerges Once Again

What happens to the 400 million or so firearms already in private hands? How does society actually benefit from his plan? Stephens doesn’t say. He apparently just trusts that things would eventually work themselves out ...

“Death by a Thousand Cuts” – Latest Ninth Circuit decision proclaims “selling firearms is not part or parcel of the right to keep and bear arms”

Second Amendment  

Friday, October 13, 2017

“Death by a Thousand Cuts” – Latest Ninth Circuit decision proclaims “selling firearms is not part or parcel of the right to keep and bear arms”

Since the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark rulings in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago, lower courts across the country have expressed their disagreement with – or downright hostility to ...

California: Governor Brown Signs Remaining Anti-Gun Bill

Sunday, October 15, 2017

California: Governor Brown Signs Remaining Anti-Gun Bill

Yesterday, Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill 424, the remaining anti-gun bill on his desk. 

Shall-Issue Concealed Carry Coming Soon to the Nation’s Capital!

News  

Second Amendment  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Shall-Issue Concealed Carry Coming Soon to the Nation’s Capital!

It’s important to celebrate that law-abiding Americans are now closer than they have been in nearly half a century to being able to exercise their firearms freedom in our nation’s capital. That is real progress.

California: Governor Vetoes Dealer Storage Bill and Signs Open Carry Ban

Saturday, October 14, 2017

California: Governor Vetoes Dealer Storage Bill and Signs Open Carry Ban

Yesterday, Governor Brown took action on two of the remaining three anti-gun bills by vetoing Senate Bill 464 and signing Assembly Bill 7. 

Media Consumers Beware: Watchdogs Warn of Bias, Politics, and Influence Tainting the “News”

News  

Friday, October 13, 2017

Media Consumers Beware: Watchdogs Warn of Bias, Politics, and Influence Tainting the “News”

Project Veritas’s “American Pravda” series has focused on the media itself, with prior releases including segments on CNN producers and personalities casting doubt on the network’s own narrative about Russian influence in the U.S. presidential ...

Massachusetts: Gun Control Bill on the Move

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Massachusetts: Gun Control Bill on the Move

Today, without considering the unintended effects of such poorly thought out legislation, the Massachusetts state House of Representatives passed Amendment 1 attached to House Bill 3951 with overreaching language that would ban modifications commonly made ...

California: San Jose City Council to Consider Mandatory Locked Storage Ordinance

Monday, October 16, 2017

California: San Jose City Council to Consider Mandatory Locked Storage Ordinance

On Tuesday, October 17, the San Jose City Council will be discussing a proposed firearms ordinance that will require any person who possesses a firearm in their residence to store the firearm in a locked ...

Illinois:  Anti-Gun Legislators Introduce Gun Control Legislation

Friday, October 6, 2017

Illinois: Anti-Gun Legislators Introduce Gun Control Legislation

Yesterday, omnibus gun control legislation, House Bill 4107, was introduced in the Illinois House of Representatives.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.