Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Holder’s Talking, but What is He Saying?

Friday, December 9, 2011

So far,NRA, 52 U.S. Representatives, two U.S. Senators, and multiple GOP Presidential candidates have called on Attorney General Eric Holder to resign because of his role in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosive’s failed “Operation Fast and Furious.” 

Holder has steadfastly maintained that he and top Department of Justice officials did not know the scope or details of the operation until they became public earlier this year, but this week, in advance of  hearings before the House Judiciary Committee, Holder called the “gun-walking” tactic used in the operation  “inexcusable” and “wholly unacceptable.”  He went on to say that many of the “walked” guns will likely continue to show up at crime scenes in the U.S. and Mexico. 

"Although the department has taken steps to ensure that such tactics are never used again, it is an unfortunate reality that we will continue to feel the effects of this flawed operation for years to come.  Guns lost during this operation will continue to show up at crime scenes on both sides of the border."

Amidst allegations of intentional lies and deception, and facing increased scrutiny, on Friday, December 2, DOJ turned over to Congress documents detailing how DOJ officials gave inaccurate information to U.S. Senator Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) regarding the “Fast and Furious” operation. 

In a letter last February to Sen. Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, DOJ said that the BATFE had not sanctioned the sale of “assault weapons” to a straw purchaser and that the agency makes every effort to intercept weapons that have been purchased illegally.  As we now know, both statements are incorrect.

In an unusual move, DOJ turned over 1,364 pages of related material last week.  Deputy Attorney General James Cole wrote Grassley and U.S. Representative Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that is looking into the Obama administration's handling of “Fast and Furious,” saying, “we will make a rare exception to the department's recognized protocols and provide you with information related to how the inaccurate information came to be included in the letter." 

Yesterday, testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, Holder was back in the hot-seat and back on the defensive, still asserting that top DOJ officials were not told about the "inappropriate tactics" until they were made public, and still trying to defend the obvious discrepancy between what was said earlier this year and what is now coming to light.

In one exchange, Rep. Issa said to Holder, "Yesterday, Mr. Attorney General, we became aware that e-mail between [chief of the DOJ's criminal division] Lanny Breuer and the deputy -- his deputy, Jason Weinstein, about Fast and Furious in March time frame, that they exist. Some of these -- actually all of these have been withheld from the committee. Will you agree to turn over those communications in the March time frame between Lenny Breuer and his deputy, Jason Weinstein?”

Holder:  “March of what year?”

Issa: “2011.”

Holder:  “As I have indicated, we are not going to be turning over materials after February.”

Issa:  “Are you aware that you are in fact, by doing so, in the fact that we already issued from the Oversight Committee a subpoena, you are standing in contempt of Congress unless you have a valid reason, that you express it, that you provide logs, which you've refused to provide for the -- the other information? Otherwise you will leave the committee no choice but to seek contempt for your failure to deliver or to cite a constitutional exemption.”

Holder:  “We will respond in a way that is consistent with the way in which the Justice Department has always responded to those kinds of requests.”

In an exchange with U.S. Representative James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.), Rep. Sensenbrenner asked Holder, "Tell me what's the difference between lying and misleading Congress, in this context?" 

Holder responded, "Well, if you want to have this legal conversation, it all has to do with your state of mind and whether or not you had the requisite intent to come up with something that would be considered perjury or a lie."

Sensenbrenner said it is "obvious" there was some knowledge up and down the chain at the Justice Department, and that there has merely been "an attempt to find scapegoats" for the operation.  "Mr. Attorney General, the blame must go to your desk.  And you must today take real responsibility. Why haven't you terminated the many people involved?"

Sensenbrenner went on to say that the American people deserve to know the truth and are relying on Congress to get the truth, which has so far been elusive.

"You're here today as a way to get truth -- but the answers that you have given so far, are basically saying, 'Well, gee, somebody else did it,'" Sensenbrenner said.  “There is really no responsibility within the Justice Department.  If we don't get to the bottom of this -- and that requires your assistance on that -- there is only one alternative that Congress has, and it’s called impeachment... It is an expensive and messy affair, and I don't want to go this far."

NRA-ILA has prepared a video that all freedom-loving Americans need to watch showing that Holder's actions prove he can't be trusted with the sanctity of our freedoms, the powers of his office, or the lives of our law enforcement officers.  To watch the video, please click here.

Please help spread the word and forward this video to family, friends and fellow gun owners.

To view a NRA News video of reporter Ginny Simone talking with Rep. Sensenbrenner about Holder's appearance before the House Judiciary Committee, please click here.

To view videos of Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) questioning Holder before the House Judiciary Committee, please click here, and here.

TRENDING NOW
SCOTUS Reverses and Remands Two NRA-ILA Backed Magazine Cases

News  

Thursday, June 30, 2022

SCOTUS Reverses and Remands Two NRA-ILA Backed Magazine Cases

One week after our landmark victory in NYSRPA v. Bruen, the Supreme Court issued orders in two other NRA-ILA backed cases. Those cases, ANJRPC v. Bruck and Duncan v. Bonta, challenge New Jersey and California laws that ban magazines capable ...

“I Did That!” Biden’s Gas Crisis Creates Public Safety Crisis

News  

Tuesday, July 5, 2022

“I Did That!” Biden’s Gas Crisis Creates Public Safety Crisis

The Biden Administration is serious about making it more difficult for responsible citizens to exercise their gun rights, which is hardly surprising from the most anti-Second Amendment president in history. What is less obvious is ...

California: Legislature Passes and Newsom Signs Anti-Gun Bills

Friday, July 1, 2022

California: Legislature Passes and Newsom Signs Anti-Gun Bills

The California Legislature starts their Summer recess today, but not before a busy week full of defiant action against the recent Supreme Court victory in the NRA case of NYSRPA v. Bruen. The legislature passed several anti-gun ...

New Jersey:  Despite Historic Supreme Court Ruling Gun Bills Advance in Trenton

Friday, July 1, 2022

New Jersey: Despite Historic Supreme Court Ruling Gun Bills Advance in Trenton

On the heels of last week’s landmark Supreme Court decision in NYSRPA v. Bruen, Majority Democrats in Trenton doubled down on even more Second Amendment infringements by passing yet another package of gun bills.  This is ...

California Leaks Personal Data of Carry Permit Holders

News  

Wednesday, June 29, 2022

California Leaks Personal Data of Carry Permit Holders

On Monday June 27, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the launch of the California Department of Justice (DOJ)’s Firearms Dashboard Portal. The data tool was designed to give granular firearm transaction and Concealed Carry Weapons (CCW) permit ...

A Century of Opposition to New York’s Sullivan Law

News  

Tuesday, July 5, 2022

A Century of Opposition to New York’s Sullivan Law

On June 23, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down New York’s discretionary carry licensing regime as a violation of the Second Amendment right to bear arms in the NRA-backed case NYSRPA v. Bruen. The law at ...

The Dominoes Begin to Fall: NJ Amends Permit Rules After Bruen

News  

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

The Dominoes Begin to Fall: NJ Amends Permit Rules After Bruen

New Jersey’s acting Attorney General, Matthew J. Platkin, issued a directive “clarifying requirements for carrying firearms in public” a day after the historic ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. ...

New York:  Majority Democrats Vote in Lockstep to Defy the United States Supreme Court

Friday, July 1, 2022

New York: Majority Democrats Vote in Lockstep to Defy the United States Supreme Court

Anti-Second Amendment politicians returned to Albany late this week and did the bidding of Gov. Kathy Hochul.  She called the Legislature back into an “extraordinary” session this week.  The session was anything but extraordinary. Lawmakers ...

NRA-ILA Asks Court to Stop the California DOJ From Releasing Gun Owners’ Personal Information After Massive Data Leak.

Thursday, June 30, 2022

NRA-ILA Asks Court to Stop the California DOJ From Releasing Gun Owners’ Personal Information After Massive Data Leak.

Earlier this week, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced that he would be releasing firearms data via the California DOJ’s Firearms Dashboard Portal. That data contained gun owners’ names, dates of birth, gender, race, driver’s license numbers, addresses, and criminal ...

North Carolina: Carry Permit Training Bill Going to Senate Floor

Thursday, June 30, 2022

North Carolina: Carry Permit Training Bill Going to Senate Floor

Today, the Senate pulled House Bill 49 from the Committee on Rules and Operations and will send it to the floor for final passage. It requires sheriffs to waive the training requirement for former concealed carry permit ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.