Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Wisconsin Court Finds State Carry Ban Unconstitutional -- Time for Voters to Act!

Friday, October 15, 2010

In a ruling that is likely to renew the debate over Wisconsin's laws on carrying firearms, a county trial court has found that a state statute's total ban on carrying concealed weapons violates the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
 
The ruling, issued Oct. 12 by Judge Jon M. Counsell of the Clark County Circuit Court, dismissed an indictment against Joshua Schultz, who had been arrested for carrying a knife in his waistband, covered by his shirt. 
 
Judge Counsell's opinion found that since the U.S. Supreme Court had held that the Second Amendment protects a fundamental right, any restrictions on that right must pass the Supreme Court's "strict scrutiny" test.  That means the law must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest, and must be the least restrictive means of serving that interest. 
 
While Judge Counsell agreed that there is a compelling interest in protecting public safety, he also found that the law is (as the Wisconsin Supreme Court has said) "exceptionally restrictive."  He also noted that 48 states now have less restrictive laws than Wisconsin's, yet "there have been no shootouts in town squares, no mass vigilante shootings or other violent outbreaks attributable to allowed concealed carry."
 
Judge Counsell also rejected the argument that concealed carry can be prohibited since open carry is allowed; in support of that argument, he pointed to recent incidents in Wisconsin where people openly carrying firearms have been arrested for "disorderly conduct"--even though the state attorney general has advised agencies against bringing such charges. 
 
This week's opinion is only the latest in a series that have created great uncertainty about the law among Wisconsin gun owners.  In the 2003 case of State v. Hamdan, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that individuals charged with violating the carry ban can use the state constitution's protection for the right to keep and bear arms as a defense.  The court held that convenience store owner Munir Hamdan, who had been repeatedly robbed and attacked in his store in a high-crime neighborhood, was entitled to raise that defense. 
 
But just three years later, the court ruled in the case of State v. Fisher that a tavern owner in a safer area was not entitled to raise the defense when arrested for carrying firearms in his vehicle.  On the other hand, NRA-ILA supported the successful defense of pizza delivery driver Andres Vegas, who used a gun for self-defense after being the victim of multiple robberies.  (For more information on that case, see http://www.nraila.org/Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?id=261&issue=003)
 
Anticipating the confusion that its rulings might cause, even the Wisconsin Supreme Court (in the Hamdan case) urged the legislature to take action to create a permit system.  And in fact, the legislature has passed Right-to-Carry twice, but each time, the bills were vetoed by anti-gun Gov. Jim Doyle.
 
While the state may still appeal the court's decision in the Schultz case, the case should nonetheless remind all Wisconsin gun owners of the importance of this year's governor's race.  Only by electing a pro-Second Amendment governor will the people of Wisconsin finally have the chance to clear up the confusion left by all of these rulings, and protect the Right to Carry once and for all.
TRENDING NOW
Illinois Committee Passes Bill to Increase Cost of FOID 1000

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Illinois Committee Passes Bill to Increase Cost of FOID 1000

On May 21st, the Illinois state House Judiciary Committee voted 12-7 to pass House Amendment 1 to Senate Bill 1966.  While it has not yet been scheduled for further action, the House may take it ...

Washington: Lawsuit Against I-1639 Proceeds After Motion To Dismiss Denied

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Washington: Lawsuit Against I-1639 Proceeds After Motion To Dismiss Denied

On May 20th, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington rejected a motion by the government defendants to dismiss the lawsuit filed by NRA and the SAF against Washington’s gun control ...

Out of Style: Levi’s Fawns Over Shannon Watts in Pantmaker’s Latest Gun Control Effort

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Out of Style: Levi’s Fawns Over Shannon Watts in Pantmaker’s Latest Gun Control Effort

At the National Retail Federation’s 2018 convention in New York City, Levi Strauss & Co. Brand President James Curleigh told those assembled that the multinational pants manufacturer intends to be the “most relevant lifestyle brand.” Evidently, part ...

California: Firearm Excise Tax Bill Fails to Meet Fiscal Deadline While Other Gun Control Bills Move Forward

Monday, May 20, 2019

California: Firearm Excise Tax Bill Fails to Meet Fiscal Deadline While Other Gun Control Bills Move Forward

Last week, the Assembly and Senate Appropriations Committees took up their respective suspense files ahead of the Friday, May 17, fiscal deadline. Some of the more egregious gun bills failed to meet the deadline including ...

California: DOJ Submits Proposed Regulations Regarding Upcoming Ammunition Transfer Background Check Requirements to Office of Administrative Law

Wednesday, May 22, 2019

California: DOJ Submits Proposed Regulations Regarding Upcoming Ammunition Transfer Background Check Requirements to Office of Administrative Law

Beginning July 1, 2019, all ammunition transactions in the state of California will be subject to a background check requirement.  But in order to implement this requirement, the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”) must first ...

Gov. Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Gov. Abbott Signs NRA-Backed Tenants' Rights Bill

The National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) applauded Gov. Greg Abbott on Thursday for signing NRA-backed legislation that protects tenants’ rights by prohibiting “no firearms” clauses in residential leases.   

Working Together to Save the Second Amendment Part II: State Success Stories

News  

Hunting  

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Working Together to Save the Second Amendment Part II: State Success Stories

When I started with NRA in 1995, most of the attention our organization received was over legislative efforts in Congress. Firearm-related legislation at the federal level obviously has an impact on far more law-abiding gun ...

Trump Administration, Other Pro-Gun Heavyweights Lend Support on Pending Supreme Court Case

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Trump Administration, Other Pro-Gun Heavyweights Lend Support on Pending Supreme Court Case

As NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox reported in March, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a challenge by an NRA state affiliate to a New York City gun control scheme that effectively prohibits lawfully ...

Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Only What We Want Ye to Hear

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Only What We Want Ye to Hear

Can we finally put the claim that “gun violence” research is underfunded to rest? The Bloomberg Professor of American Health at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University, Daniel Webster, and his colleagues at the Hopkins ...

Retired Justice Stevens Continues Crusade Against Guns

News  

Friday, May 17, 2019

Retired Justice Stevens Continues Crusade Against Guns

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens does not believe a law-abiding citizen has a right to possess firearms under the Second Amendment, and he wants to make sure everyone knows it. He made his ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.