Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Arming Ships and Repelling Pirates

Friday, November 20, 2009

It was widely reported this week that the Maersk Alabama -- the American-flagged ship that was captured by pirates last April -- came under attack for the second time in seven months as Somali pirates once again tried to hijack the ship early Wednesday morning off the Somalia coast. 

In the April attack, pirates were successful in boarding the ship and taking captain Richard Phillips hostage, holding him at gunpoint in a lifeboat for five harrowing days.  A Navy SEAL team was eventually able to free Phillips, killing three pirates and capturing a fourth in the process. 

This time around, when the sea-thugs approached the ship and fired on it, they were met with return gunfire from the ship's security detail, and were repelled in their attack. 

While the shipping industry has yet to endorse the use of armed security, as the number of violent attacks continues to increase, a few ship owners and operators have chosen common sense and a right to self-defense over appeasement and political correctness by hiring their own armed security personnel. 

Piracy off the Somali coast continues to rise, with the pirates seeming to become more sophisticated and bold with every passing day.  And, unfortunately, the pirates' success and boldness are bolstered by well-meaning but futile attempts to "negotiate" with them.  On Tuesday, pirates released 36 crewmembers from a Spanish tuna trawler after holding them hostage for more than six weeks. The pirates reportedly received a $3.3 million ransom. 

"Somali pirates understand one thing and only one thing, and that's force," said Captain Joseph Murphy, a maritime security professor at the Massachusetts Maritime Academy and the father of a sailor who was on the Maersk Alabama during the first pirate attack in April.  "They analyze risk very carefully, and when the risk is too high they are going to step back.  They are not going to jeopardize themselves." 

Vice Admiral Bill Gortney of the U.S. Naval Forces Central Command said in a statement that the Maersk Alabama had followed the maritime industry's "best practices" by having a security team on board the ship.  "This is a great example of how merchant mariners can take proactive action to prevent being attacked and why we recommend that ships follow industry best practices if they're in high-risk areas," said Gortney. 

However, when it comes to armed self-defense on the high seas, not all agree.  Roger Middleton, a piracy expert at the London-based think tank Chatham House, said the international maritime community was still "solidly against" armed guards aboard vessels at sea, but that American ships have taken a different line than the rest of the international community. 

"Shipping companies are still pretty much overwhelmingly opposed to the idea of armed guards," Middleton said.  "Lots of private security companies employ people who don't have maritime experience. Also, there's the idea that it's the responsibility of states and navies to provide security.  I would think it's a step backward if we start privatizing security of the shipping trade." 

Clearly, merchant ships in known hostile waters need guns to fight pirates and repel their attacks.  No general would think to send troops into a combat zone unarmed.  In a hostile environment, unarmed ships, like unarmed people, are vulnerable.  You know that, and so do the pirates.  Criminals and predators of all types prefer an easy target. 

The parallel between criminal and victim on the sea, or in your community is obvious.  It is not practical to depend on the U.S. Navy to protect all merchant ships, in every circumstance, any more than it is practical to rely on the police to protect you, your home, and your family 24 hours a day.  Navy ships and local police cannot be everywhere all of the time, and they generally arrive at "the scene of the crime" after the crime has already taken place. 

It is far better to afford merchant ships and law-abiding citizens the opportunity to defend themselves.  The best way to eliminate crime is to eliminate criminals, and to respect the innate right of self-defense.
TRENDING NOW
Washington: Trigger Modification Ban Passes Committee

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Washington: Trigger Modification Ban Passes Committee

Earlier today, the Washington state Senate Law & Justice Committee passed Senate Bill 5992 out of committee with a 4-3 vote. As drafted, this legislation has overreaching language that would ban modifications commonly made to ...

Washington: Substitute Version of Gun Control Bill Passes House Committee

Friday, January 19, 2018

Washington: Substitute Version of Gun Control Bill Passes House Committee

Yesterday, the House Judiciary Committee passed Substitute House Bill 1122 out of committee on a 7-6 vote.  This bill, which would require gun owners to lock up their firearms or potentially face criminal charges, will ...

Eighteen States, Law Enforcement, Doctors, and Firearm Rights Groups File Amicus Briefs in Lawsuit Challenging California 10+ Magazine Ban

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Eighteen States, Law Enforcement, Doctors, and Firearm Rights Groups File Amicus Briefs in Lawsuit Challenging California 10+ Magazine Ban

On Friday, January 12, several amicus briefs were filed in the NRA and CRPA supported lawsuit challenging California’s restrictions against magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. The lawsuit, titled Duncan v. Becerra, challenges California’s ...

Washington: House Judiciary to Hear Gun Control Bills

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Washington: House Judiciary to Hear Gun Control Bills

On Thursday, January 25th at 1:30PM, the House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hear several sweeping gun control bills.  NRA Members and Second Amendment supporters are strongly encouraged to attend the committee hearing to voice your opposition ...

Crossing the Line – Firearm Preemption Protection Under Attack

News  

Friday, January 19, 2018

Crossing the Line – Firearm Preemption Protection Under Attack

Gun control groups are fond of describing preemption as a doctrine whereby a state has stripped local governments of their power to regulate guns.

Hawaii: Trigger Modification Ban Introduced in the Senate

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Hawaii: Trigger Modification Ban Introduced in the Senate

Today, Senator Karl Rhoads (D-13) introduced legislation that would ban modifications commonly made to firearms by law-abiding citizens.  SB 2046 is currently pending a committee referral.  Please contact your Senator today and urge them to OPPOSE this ...

Democrats' Exciting New Hope Adheres to Tired Old Anti-Gun Dogma

News  

Friday, January 12, 2018

Democrats' Exciting New Hope Adheres to Tired Old Anti-Gun Dogma

Democrats searching for a standard-bearer in the 2020 presidential election lit on long-time entertainment, media, and publishing figure Oprah Winfrey this week, following a speech Winfrey gave at a televised Hollywood extravaganza.

Washington: CPL Permit Confidentiality Bill Introduced

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Washington: CPL Permit Confidentiality Bill Introduced

Last week, Washington legislators introduced an NRA-backed bill to protect the private, personal information of Washington's concealed pistol license holders from public records requests.  Senate Bill 6173, sponsored by Senator Dean Takko (D-19), and House Bill ...

Australia: Queensland’s Labor Party Government Targets MP for Gun Control Heresy

News  

Friday, January 19, 2018

Australia: Queensland’s Labor Party Government Targets MP for Gun Control Heresy

The sorry state of gun politics in Australia was put into stark relief recently, after Liberal National Party (LNP) Queensland Legislative Assembly MP Anthony Perrett took a principled stand in favor of his constituents’ gun rights.

Indiana: Gun Bills Filed

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Indiana: Gun Bills Filed

With the 2018 Indiana legislative session underway, a number of bills affecting your Second Amendment and hunting rights have been filed.

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -
NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.