Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN News

Gun Trafficking to Mexico: Already Against the Law

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

An extensive web of laws applies to firearms transactions related to gun trafficking between the United States and Mexico.

First, any Mexican or other foreign citizen is generally prohibited or restricted from acquiring firearms in the United States.  Federal law prohibits illegal aliens (along with other prohibited persons, such as convicted felons) from possessing or receiving firearms.[1]  Lawful resident aliens may acquire firearms in the U.S., but under ATF regulations must prove 90 days’ continuous residence in a state to do so.[2]  Nonimmigrant aliens must meet the same 90-day residency requirement, and must also fall under one of the other exceptions to the federal statute that generally prohibits nonimmigrant aliens from possessing or receiving firearms.[3]  Transfers to aliens who don’t meet any of these requirements are prohibited.[4]  Sales by licensees are subject to instant background checks, which check the buyer’s alien status along with criminal and other records.[5]

            Prohibited aliens may try to evade these restrictions by using “straw purchasers” who are not prohibited from receiving firearms.  A straw purchaser who buys from a licensed dealer violates the federal law that prohibits making false statements in dealers’ records in connection with the acquisition of a firearm, because the “Firearms Transaction Record” completed by the buyer asks if the person completing the form is the “actual buyer of the firearm(s) listed on the form.”[6]  Even a person who simply travels into a state from any other “State or foreign country” with intent to engage in such a transaction violates federal law.[7]

On the dealer’s side of the table, any person who sells or delivers a firearm to a person the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is not a resident of the same state would generally violate the law.[8]  A licensee who makes sales off the books also violates the law by failing to keep required records of transactions.[9]

            Transporting firearms from the U.S. to Mexico poses more legal obstacles to the would-be trafficker.  Shipping, transporting or receiving a firearm with intent to commit a felony with it, or knowing that someone else will use it to commit a felony, is punishable by ten years in prison.[10]  The trafficker would also break the law if he tried to ship firearms by common carrier without declaring the contents of the package,[11] or by mailing a handgun.[12]  There are also specific prohibitions on shipping or transporting stolen firearms,[13] or firearms with obliterated serial numbers.[14]

            If a trafficker manages to export firearms from the U.S. without a license from the State Department, he violates the Arms Export Control Act, which prohibits unlicensed exports of “defense articles.”[15]  Illegally exported “arms or munitions of war” are subject to seizure and forfeiture.[16]

            Even if the trafficker does not remove the firearm from the U.S., he can still be punished for transferring it to someone else in the U.S., if the transferor knows the firearm will be used to commit a violent or drug trafficking crime.[17]  And even if a group of traffickers are ultimately unsuccessful, they can still be punished under the general federal conspiracy statute, as long as one of the conspirators commits some act to carry out the plan.[18]

            Nearly all of the violations described above are federal felonies that carry potential prison terms of five years or more, and fines of $250,000 and up.[19]

            Mexico, of course, also has strict and complex gun laws of its own, which allow for up to three years’ imprisonment for importation of arms “that can only be used to attack” or that are not “for public servants.”[20] Mexico prohibits civilian possession of firearms or ammunition in calibers commonly used by the military (such as 9mm or larger handguns, and .223 and .30 caliber rifles).[21]  Unauthorized possession of these and other “arm[s] exclusively reserved for the use of the Army, Navy or Air Force” is punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment.[22]  Gun sales within Mexico are a government monopoly, conducted at a single store operated by the army in Mexico City.[23]

            Another factor in all cross-border issues, of course, is corruption among Mexican officials.  Some in the Mexican government, including the legislature’s National Defense Commission, have acknowledged this.  According to one Mexican congressman, “[t]he corruption in customs, and the incapacity of the Mexican state to control it, allows them right through.”[24]

            This summary should make clear that the United States has very strong criminal laws that apply to every link in the trafficking chain, between the first acquisition of a firearm in the U.S. and its transportation to Mexico or any other country.  Strong enforcement of existing U.S. firearm laws, and cooperative enforcement programs with Mexican authorities, are likely to be more productive than added restrictions on firearm transactions by U.S. citizens.

 


[1] 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(A).

[2] 27 C.F.R. § 478.124(c)(3)(ii) (requiring aliens to provide utility bills, lease agreements, or other documentation to prove residency for purchases from licensees).

[3] 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(B), (y)(2) (providing exceptions for persons admitted for lawful hunting or sporting purposes and persons in possession of a U.S. hunting license, as well as foreign diplomats, law enforcement and other officials).

[4] 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(5)(A).

[5] 18 U.S.C. § 922(t); Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Operations 2005 iv (Jan. 2006).  The main exception to the background check requirement—an exemption for buyers who present a state license to possess or acquire a firearm—wouldn’t be available to prohibited aliens or other prohibited buyers, because the exemption only applies to permits issued after a background check.

[6] 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(6), 924(a)(1)(A); ATF Form 4473.

[7] 18 U.S.C. § 924(n).

[8] See 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(5) (restricting sales by nonlicensees) and (b)(3) (licensees).  While the statute does allow some interstate sales of rifles and shotguns by licensees (only), those sales must comply with the laws of both the seller’s and the buyer’s “States,” so sales to a resident of Mexico would also be prohibited.  There is no interstate sale exception for handguns.

[9] 18 U.S.C. § 922(m).

[10] 18 U.S.C. § 924(b).

[11] 18 U.S.C. § 922(e).

[12] 18 U.S.C. § 1715.

[13] 18 U.S.C. § 922(i), (j).

[14] 18 U.S.C. § 922(k).

[15] 22 U.S.C. § 2778(b)(2).  Firearms are “defense articles” on the U.S. Munitions List.  See 22 C.F.R. §121.1, Category I.

[16] 22 U.S.C. § 401.  This provision “has been consistently applied to any items destined for unlawful export.”  United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 835 (2d Cir. 1980) (emphasis added).

[17] 18 U.S.C. § 924(h).

[18] 18 U.S.C. § 371.

[19] See generally 18 U.S.C. §§ 924, 3571(b); 22 U.S.C. § 2778(c).

[20] C.P.D.F., arts. 160, 162.

[21] Ley Federal de Armas de Fuego y Explosivos of Jan. 11, 1972 (D.O., Jan. 11, 1972), arts. 10 & 11  (English translation as amended through June 2002, available at http://www.natlaw.com/trans/tnstcs1.htm; for another translation based on Mexico’s 2004 text, see http://davekopel.org/Espanol/mexican-firearms-statutes.htm).

[22] Id. art. 83.

[23] Chris Hawley, “Mexico says gun controls undermined by U.S. laws,” USA Today, April 1, 2009 at A5.

[24] Sara Miller Llana, “US guns arm Mexico`s drug wars,” The Christian Science Monitor, July 18, 2007 at 1.

TRENDING NOW
Kentucky: Committee to Consider Firearm Seizures Without Due Process

Friday, November 15, 2019

Kentucky: Committee to Consider Firearm Seizures Without Due Process

On Friday, November 22nd, the Kentucky state Interim Joint Committee on Judiciary will consider so called “red-flag laws.” Though no legislation has been introduced, such laws usually allow for Second Amendment rights to be suspended ...

Virginia Police Chief Advocates Ban on All Guns at U.S. House “Assault Weapons” Hearing

News  

Friday, September 27, 2019

Virginia Police Chief Advocates Ban on All Guns at U.S. House “Assault Weapons” Hearing

On Sept. 25, the Democrat-led U.S. House Judiciary Committee held a 3 ½ hour “hearing” entitled “Protecting America From Assault Weapons.” That framing of the issue underscored the erroneous notion that Americans need protection from ...

NRA's Statement on Second Amendment Sanctuaries

News  

Friday, December 6, 2019

NRA's Statement on Second Amendment Sanctuaries

Read the NRA's statement on Second Amendment sanctuaries. “It is the tyrannical nature of politicians that triggers sanctuary, not the other way around...”

Bloomberg Bought Virginia Legislators Introduce Confiscatory Gun Ban

News  

Monday, November 25, 2019

Bloomberg Bought Virginia Legislators Introduce Confiscatory Gun Ban

Michael Bloomberg’s bought and paid for Virginia legislators have wasted no time introducing legislation that would make the Old Dominion’s gun laws worse than those of the billionaire’s home state of New York.

Background Checks for Family Members?! Bloomberg-Bought Virginia Legislature Seeks to Ban Private Firearms Transfers

Friday, December 6, 2019

Background Checks for Family Members?! Bloomberg-Bought Virginia Legislature Seeks to Ban Private Firearms Transfers

Michael Bloomberg’s bought-and-paid-for new Virginia majorities have wasted no time introducing an extremist bill that would make the Commonwealth one of the most hostile states for law-abiding gun owners.

Monday, August 19, 2019

Florida Alert! "Assault Weapons" Ban Amendment Bans ALL SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS

The so-called "assault weapons" ban that is proposed for a constitutional amendment to be on the 2020 Election Ballot bans the possession of: “any semiautomatic rifle or shotgun CAPABLE of holding more than ten (10) rounds ...

NRA Files Joint Legal Challenge Against Firearm Storage Initiative Petition

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

NRA Files Joint Legal Challenge Against Firearm Storage Initiative Petition

On Friday, the National Rifle Association announced the filing of a joint legal challenge with the Oregon Hunters Association to contest Oregon Initiative Petition 40, which seeks to impose sweeping restrictions on the storage of ...

NRA-Supported Case Heard by Supreme Court

News  

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

NRA-Supported Case Heard by Supreme Court

The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) says this week’s Supreme Court hearing on a New York City gun control law could ultimately strengthen the ability of law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second ...

Joe Biden Wants to Ban 9mm Pistols

News  

Monday, November 25, 2019

Joe Biden Wants to Ban 9mm Pistols

A week after he told voters that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect “a magazine with a hundred clips in it,” 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidate Joe Biden offered supporters more of his singular brand of anti-gun ...

Massachusetts: Hearing on Bill to Mandate Doctors Push State’s Anti-Gun Agenda

Saturday, December 7, 2019

Massachusetts: Hearing on Bill to Mandate Doctors Push State’s Anti-Gun Agenda

On December 10th, the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Public Health will hear House Bill 2005 to impose a mandatory requirement for doctors to ask patients about firearms in their homes and for the type of ...

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.