Explore The NRA Universe Of Websites

APPEARS IN Legal & Legislation

Vote on North Carolina Anti-Gun Bill Imminent!

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Please Contact Your State Representative Immediately!

 

A vote on House Bill 1287, introduced by State Representative Ronnie Sutton (D-47), could come as early as today.  The bill seeks to create a new statewide database to which sheriffs would report all individuals who have been denied a permit to purchase a pistol.  PLEASE CALL YOUR STATE REPRESENTATIVE AT (919) 733-4111 AND URGE HIM OR HER TO OPPOSE HB 1287.

 

While this legislation may seem benign to law-abiding gun owners, as they say, the devil is in the details.  The problem is not, necessarily, with the proposal, but with the current approval process for purchase permits.  Originally enacted in 1919--long before anyone imagined the possibility of centralized computer databases of criminal records--the law requires anyone who wishes to purchase a pistol to acquire a permit from the sheriff of the county in which that person resides. 

 

At the time, sheriffs likely had the most immediate access to information that would indicate an applicant had a violent criminal record, so it would seem logical that they would be the best source to try to determine if an individual had a history that indicated he or she should be prohibited from acquiring a handgun. 

 

Today, however, there is a national database law enforcement may access, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), to determine if an individual is statutorily prohibited from purchasing or possessing a handgun--or any firearm, for that matter. 

 

Unfortunately, the current permit to purchase process allows sheriffs to deny a permit not just to people statutorily prohibited from purchasing or possessing a pistol, but also allows denials for random, arbitrary reasons. 

 

Under the current permit process, a permit applicant must not only be free of any statutory disqualifications for purchasing or possessing any firearm--including pistols--but he or she must also prove to the sheriff "by affidavits, oral evidence, or otherwise, as to the good moral character of the applicant."  It is this vague standard where problems arise.  A sheriff could deny a permit simply because he or she feels the individual should not possess a pistol, for whatever reason, in spite of the fact the applicant may have no history of criminal activity. 

 

It is important to remember that the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is protected in both the U.S. and North Carolina Constitutions, and reasons for denying this right must be carefully considered, and carefully spelled out.  Federal and state law do this. 

 

Allowing sheriffs to deny a permit to purchase a pistol for anything other than clearly defined standards is contrary to the protections that are constitutionally enshrined. 

 

But what makes matters worse is that HB 1287 would not only establish a new database where arbitrary denials are entered, but the information, as mandated by this legislation, would remain in the new database for eight (8) years.  An individual who has been arbitrarily denied a permit to purchase would have that cloud hanging over him or her every time he or she applies for a permit, even if that person moves to a new county where the sheriff does not have a problem with people possessing handguns for lawful purposes.  The new sheriff would still see the applicant was once denied a permit, and may deny based on that little bit of information.  Sheriffs are already tasked with a great deal of responsibility, as well as granted a great deal of power and authority.  The responsibility of determining who should or should not be permitted to exercise a constitutionally protected right should not weigh on these public servants.  The authority to arbitrarily or randomly deny a law-abiding individual the ability to exercise a right protected by both the U.S. and North Carolina Constitutions should not be enhanced by allowing them to make decisions that could result in a cloud of confusion hovering over a law-abiding citizen for eight years. 

 

PLEASE CALL YOUR STATE REPRESENTATIVE AT (919) 733-4111
AND URGE HIM OR HER TO OPPOSE HB 1287.



To find further contact information or help identifying your legislators
please use the
"Write Your Representative" feature found at www.NRAILA.org.

TRENDING NOW
Let My Cans Go: Trump Administration Adds Sound Suppressors to Export Reform

News  

Monday, July 27, 2026

Let My Cans Go: Trump Administration Adds Sound Suppressors to Export Reform

Eight years ago, NRA filed comments in support of the Trump Administration’s plan to reform exports of firearms and ammunition – as well as their parts, components, and accessories. 

DOJ Withdraws Appeal in Challenge to Post Office Firearms Ban

News  

Monday, July 27, 2026

DOJ Withdraws Appeal in Challenge to Post Office Firearms Ban

Another significant victory has emerged in the ongoing effort to roll back unconstitutional restrictions on the right to bear arms in places that millions of law-abiding Americans visit every day in every state in towns ...

“Hell, No!” to Beto 2.0

News  

Monday, July 27, 2026

“Hell, No!” to Beto 2.0

Remember “Beto” O’Rourke and his runs for political office, hellbent on gun control?  

Court Stays NRA Challenge to Virginia’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans, Keeping Statewide Injunction in Place Until Supreme Court Rules on “Assault Weapon” Bans

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

Court Stays NRA Challenge to Virginia’s “Assault Firearm” and Magazine Bans, Keeping Statewide Injunction in Place Until Supreme Court Rules on “Assault Weapon” Bans

In the NRA’s challenge to Virginia’s “assault firearm” and magazine bans, Santolla v. Katz, the court today entered an order memorializing the parties’ agreement to stay the case until after the U.S. Supreme Court issues ...

En Banc Third Circuit Strikes Down New Jersey’s “Assault Firearm” and “Large Capacity Magazine” Bans in NRA Case

Friday, July 17, 2026

En Banc Third Circuit Strikes Down New Jersey’s “Assault Firearm” and “Large Capacity Magazine” Bans in NRA Case

In a landmark victory for the Second Amendment and the National Rifle Association, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit today held that New Jersey’s bans on commonly owned semiautomatic rifles and magazines ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Case Challenging Maryland’s Refusal to Recognize Out-of-State Carry Permits

Friday, July 24, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief in Case Challenging Maryland’s Refusal to Recognize Out-of-State Carry Permits

The National Rifle Association joined the Second Amendment Foundation, Maryland Shall Issue, California Rifle & Pistol Association, Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, Second Amendment Law Center, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, ...

New Hampshire: Governor Ayotte Signs Pro-Gun Reforms Into Law

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

New Hampshire: Governor Ayotte Signs Pro-Gun Reforms Into Law

On July 15, Governor Kelly Ayotte signed two pro-gun bills into law. 

Grassroots Spotlight: NRA 2A Day at Target Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Take Action  

Monday, July 27, 2026

Grassroots Spotlight: NRA 2A Day at Target Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico

NRA–ILA FrontLines activist Carmen Fontanez, held her most recent “NRA 2A Day” event in Puerto Rico, at Target Center in San Juan. 

“Property Rights” Critique of Wolford Misleads on Facts and Law

News  

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

“Property Rights” Critique of Wolford Misleads on Facts and Law

On June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Wolford v. Lopez. The case involved a Hawaii law that presumptively banned carry permit holders from carrying their arms onto publicly accessible private property, unless the carrier ...

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging Indiana Supreme Court to Protect Associational Standing

Tuesday, July 28, 2026

NRA Files Amicus Brief Urging Indiana Supreme Court to Protect Associational Standing

The National Rifle Association joined a coalition of 23 nonprofit organizations, led by the ACLU of Indiana, in filing an amicus brief urging the Indiana Supreme Court to recognize the doctrine of associational standing. 

MORE TRENDING +
LESS TRENDING -

More Like This From Around The NRA

NRA ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.